Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T07:58:40.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring “Term Limitedness” in U.S. Multi-State Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson
Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By measuring U.S. term limits dichotomously, investigators ignore the vast differences among laws limiting state legislative service. Furthermore, this measurement problem increases the risk of false negatives and confounds the effects of term limits with those of the citizen initiative. To address this, I propose two sets of continuous measures of term-limitedness. The first set compares mandated turnover after term limits to turnover in the 1980s, the decade before term limits began sweeping elected officials from office. A second set adjusts the first set to reflect the potential for legislators to cycle repeatedly between legislative chambers when only their consecutive years of service are limited. These continuous measures outperformed a dichotomous designation of term limits in two tests, suggesting that the proposed measures can reduce the risk of false negatives about term limits in U.S. multi-state research and that they are more robust in the face of confounding effects from the citizen initiative.

Type
The Practical Researcher
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Summer 2010 , pp. 199 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cain, Bruce, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2007. “Committees.” In Institutional Change in American Politics: The Case of Term Limits, eds., Kurtz, , Karl, Bruce Cain, and Niemi, Richard G.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., Berry, William D., Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Snyder, James M.. 2008. “State Legislative Election Returns, 1967–2003” [Computer file]. ICPSR21480-v1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina [producer], 2007. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008–04–22. doi:10.3886/ICPSR21480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Christopher A. and Richardson, Lilliard E. Jr. 2006. “Institutions and Representational Roles in American State Legislatures.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 6:174–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of State Governments. 1992. Book of the States 91–92. Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Council of State Governments. 1993. Book of the States 92–93. Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Council of State Governments. 2007. Book of the States 2007. Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
Council of State Governments. 2008. Book of the States 2008. Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Erler, H. Abbie. 2005. “So Much to Do, So Little Time: Term Limits and State Fiscal Policy.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Erler, H. Abbie. 2007. “Legislative Term Limits and State Spending.” Public Choice, 133:479–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, Keith E., Hedlund, Ronald D., and Martorano, Nancy. 2006. “Measuring State Legislative Committee Power: Change and Chamber Differences in the 20th Century.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 6:88–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberlig, Eric S. and Leland, Suzanne. 2004. “Term Limits, Opportunity Structures, and Career Development in State Legislatures.” Presented at the Fourth Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy, University of Akron, Akron, OH.Google Scholar
Kousser, Thad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2008. “Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship: A Review.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 9:204–28.Google Scholar
Sarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorie, Thompson, Lyke, Elder, Charles D., Strate, John, and Elling, Richard C.. 2004. Political and Institutional Effects of Term Limits. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straayer, John. 2003. “Colorado: Lots of Commotion, Limited Consequences.” In The Test of Time: Coping with Legislative Term Limits, eds., Farmer, Rick, Rausch, John David Jr., and Green, John C.. Lanham, MD: Lexington, Books.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Grummel, John A., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2001. “The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the American States.” American Politics Research 29:625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Ronald E. 1995. “Redistricting and the Courts: Judicial Activism in the 1990s.” American Politics Quarterly 23:204–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witko, Christopher. 2007. “Explaining Increases in the Stringency of State Campaign Finance Regulation, 1993–2002.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:369–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 2007. “Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:256–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar