Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:41:14.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elite Interviews and State Politics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Glenn Beamer*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Abstract

Elite interviews have long been a staple of state politics research. Improved information technology facilitates the use of elite interviews, but also underscores the need for attending to their design, operationalization, and analysis. This essay provides a framework for developing, conducting, and interpreting elite interviews, and suggests means to enhance the validity and reliability of findings by considering instrumentation, sampling, data collection, and transcript analysis.

Type
The Practical Researcher
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beamer, Glenn. 1999. Creative Politics: Taxes and Public Goods in a Federal System. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernacki, Patrick, and Waldorf, Dan. 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling.” Sociological Methods and Research 2(10):141163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Zeller, Richard A.. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Dean, John P., and Whyte, William Foote. 1970. “How Do You Know if the Informant is Telling the Truth?” In Elite and Specialized Interviewing, ed. Dexter, Lewis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Dexter, Lewis Anthony, ed. 1970. Elite and Specialized Interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 1998. “Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study.” Comparative Politics 30:127146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1986. “Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 80:316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Gary. 1990. Practical Sampling. Newberry Park, CA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E. 1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Whicker, Marcia Lynn. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Judd, Charles M., Smith, Eliot R., and Kidder, Louise H.. 1991. Research Methods in Social Relations. 6th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loepp, Daniel. 1999. Sharing the Balance of Power: An Examination of Shared Power in the Michigan House of Representatives, 1993-94. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morehouse, Sarah McCally. 1998. The Governor As Party Leader: Campaigning and Governing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newberry Park, CA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reeher, Grant. 1996. Narratives of Justice: Legislators' Beliefs about Distributive Fairness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Policy.” American Political Science Review 87:334347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidman, Irving. 1998. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John C., Eulau, Heinz, Buchanan, William, and Ferguson, LeRoy C.. 1962. The Legislative System. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar