Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:06:39.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Justifying the War of 1812

Toward a Model of Congressional Behavior in Early War Crises

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Ronald L. Hatzenbuehler
Affiliation:
Idaho State University
Robert L. Ivie
Affiliation:
Washington State University

Extract

A decade ago, Richard Hofstadter wrote that historians were approaching consensus on the political origins of the War of 1812. Blending elements of the work during the early 1960s of Norman K. Risjord, Bradford Perkins, and Roger H. Brown, Hofstadter (1969: 181) concluded that Republicans were convinced “the Republic itself and the fate of republican government had come to rest on the ability of the Republican party to take a forceful stand against foreign incursions on American rights.” Republicans, in other words, melded national with partisan goals and pursued war to save national honor and the Republican party.

Today, however, one would have to conclude that Hofstadter’s prediction was premature, based upon the spate of articles published since 1972 addressing the partisan nature of the vote for war in the House of Representatives, the role of the War Hawks in the debates and legislation of the war session, and the leadership (or lack thereof) supplied by James Madison (Hatzenbuehler, 1972b, 1976; Egan, 1974; Stagg, 1976; Hickey, 1976; Fritz, 1977; Bell, 1979).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. R. (1969) “They chose the sword: appeals to war in nineteenth century American public address.” Today’s Speech 42: 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annals of Congress (1853) Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States, 1789–1824. Washington, DC: Gales & Seaton. (Fifth, Tenth, and Twelfth Congresses.)Google Scholar
Bell, R. M. (1979) “Mr. Madison’s war and long-term congressional voting behavior.” William and Mary Q. 36 (July): 373395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1959) “National images and international systems.” J. of Conflict Resolution 3 (June): 120131.Google Scholar
Brown, R. H. (1964) The Republic in Peril: 1812. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1965) “Jeffersonian attitudes toward executive leadership and committee development in the House of Representatives, 1789–1829.” Western Pol. Q. 18 (March): 4563.Google Scholar
De Conde, A. (1966) The Quasi-War: The Politics and Diplomacy of the Undeclared War with France, 1797–1801. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Egan, C. L. (1974) “The origins of the War of 1812: three decades of historical writing.” Military Affairs 38 (April): 7275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, H. W. (1977) “The War Hawks of 1812: party leadership in the Twelfth Congress.” Capitol Studies 5 (Spring): 2542.Google Scholar
Hatzenbuehler, R. L. (1972a) “Foreign policy voting in the United States Congress, 1808–1812.” Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University.Google Scholar
Hatzenbuehler, R. L. (1972b) “Party unity and the decision for war in the House of Representatives, 1812.” William and Mary Q. 29 (July): 367390.Google Scholar
Hatzenbuehler, R. L. (1976) “The War Hawks and the question of congressional leadership in 1812.“ Pacific Historical Rev. 45 (February): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, D. R. (1976) “Letter to the editor.” Pacific Historical Rev. 45 (November): 642644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (1969) The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780–1840. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, O. R. (1962) “The belief system and national images: a case study.” J. of Conflict Resolution 6 (September): 244252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivie, R. L. (1974) “Presidential motives for war.” Q. J. of Speech 60 (October): 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, L. S. (1964) “France and Madison’s decision for war, 1812.” Mississippi Valley Historical Rev. 50 (March): 652671.Google Scholar
Ladd, C. E. Jr. (1970) American Political Parties: Social Change and Political Response. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lipscomb, A. A. and Bergh, A. E. [eds.] (1904) The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 11. Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association of the United States.Google Scholar
Mannix, R. (1979) “Gallatin, Jefferson, and the embargo of 1808.” Diplomatic History 3 (Spring): 151172.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. (1940) “Situated actions and vocabularies of motive.” American Sociological Review 5: 904913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risjord, N. K. (1961) “1812, conservatives, war hawks, and the nation’s honor.” William and Mary Q. 18 (April): 196210.Google Scholar
Sindler, A. P. (1966) Political Parties in the United States. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Spivak, B. (1979) Jefferson’s English Crisis: Commerce, Embargo, and the Republican Revolution. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Stagg, J.C.A. (1976) “James Madison and the‘malcontents’: the political origins of the War of 1812.” William and Mary Q. 33 (October): 557585.Google Scholar
Stagg, J.C.A. (1979) “James Madison and the coercion of Great Britain: Canada, the West Indies, and the War of 1812.” Presented at the Library of Congress, April 4.Google Scholar
Stout, H. S. (1977) “Religion, communications, and the ideological origins of the American Revolution.” William and Mary Q. 34 (October): 519541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swierenga, R. P. (1974) “Computers and American history: the impact of the ‘new’ generation.” J. of Amer. History 60 (March): 10451070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winn, L. J. (1972) “The War Hawks’ call to arms: appeals for a second war with Great Britain.” Southern Speech Communication J. 37 (Summer): 402412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar