Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T14:18:20.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Household Organization and Migration in Nineteenth-Century Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

David I. Kertzer  and
Dennis P. Hogan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kinship ranks second only to economic factors in social-scientific attempts to explain who migrates, when they move, and where they go. A person’s household circumstances are commonly thought to influence his or her propensity to move, as is the presence of other kin in the same community. Furthermore, the existence and location of kin in other communities are commonly thought to affect both the propensity to move and the choice of destination. Much of the international migration literature, accordingly, focuses on kin chains of migration, while much of the contemporary internal migration literature focuses on rural-urban kinship ties and on the continuing importance of extended kinship ties in societies experiencing high rates of urban-bound migration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , Winter 1990 , pp. 483 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. (1971) Family Structure in Nineteenth-Century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barbagli, M. (1984) Sotto lo stesso tetto: Mutamenti della famiglia in Italia dal 15 al 20 secolo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Berkner, L. K. (1972) “The stem family and the developmental cycle of the peasant household.” American Historical Review 77: 398–418.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Schwarzweller, H., and Mangalam, J. (1963) “Kentucky mountain migration and the stem family: An American variation on a theme by Le Play.” Rural Sociology 28: 48–69.Google Scholar
Choldin, H. M. (1973) “Kinship networks in the migration process.” International Migration Review 7: 163-75.Google Scholar
Eames, E. (1967) “Urban migration and the joint family in a North Indian village.” Journal of Developing Areas 2: 163-77.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. W. (1981) The European Demographic System, 1500-1820. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Guillemette, A., and Legare, J. (1989) “The influence of kinship on seventeenth-century immigration to Canada.” Continuity and Change 4: 79–102.Google Scholar
Gutkind, P. C. W. (1965) “African urbanism, mobility, and the social network.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 6: 48–60.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1983) “Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation system,” in Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.) Family Forms in Historic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 65–104.Google Scholar
Hammel, E. A., and Laslett, P. (1974) “Comparing household structure over time and between cultures.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16: 73–109.Google Scholar
Hareven, T. K. (1982) Family Time and Industrial Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstadt, S. (1983) “Migration in preindustrial Germany.” Central European History 16: 195–224.Google Scholar
Hogan, D. P., and Kertzer, D. I. (1985a) “Migration patterns during Italian urbanization, 1865-1921.” Demography 22: 309-25.Google Scholar
Hogan, D. P., and Kertzer, D. I. (1985b) “Longitudinal approaches to migration in social history.” Historical Methods 18: 20–30.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. Jr., and Moch, L. P. (1989) “Migration and the social history of modern Europe.” Historical Methods 22: 27–36.Google Scholar
Karweit, N., and Kertzer, D. I. (1986) “Data base management for life course family research,” in Kertzer, D. I. (ed.) Family Relations in Life Course Perspective. Greenwich, MA: JAI: 167-88.Google Scholar
Katz, M. B. (1975) The People of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and Class in a Mid-Nineteenth-Century City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, M. B., Doucet, M. J., and Stern, M. J. (1982) The Social Organization of Early Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. (1984) Family Life in Central Italy, 1880-1910. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. (1987) “Childhood and industrialization in Italy.” Anthropological Quarterly 61: 152-59.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I., and Hogan, D. P. (1985) “On the move: Migration in an Italian community, 1865-1921.” Social Science History 9: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. (1988) “Family structure, individual lives, and societal change,” in Riley, M. W. (ed.) Social Structures and Human Lives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 83–100.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. (1989) Family, Political Economy, and Demographic Change: The Transformation of Life in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861-1921. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. (1988) Demographic Behavior in the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kussmaul, A. (1981) Servants in Husbandry in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1977) Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehning, J. R. (1980) The Peasants of Marlhes. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Long, L. H. (1972) “The influence of number and ages of children on residential mobility.” Demography 9: 371-82.Google Scholar
MacEwen, A. M. (1973) “Kinship and mobility on the Argentine pampa.” Ethnology 12: 135-51.Google Scholar
Miller, S. J. (1976) “Family life cycle, extended family orientations, and aspirations as factors in the propensity to migrate.” Sociological Quarterly 17: 323-35.Google Scholar
Moch, L. (1986) “The family and migration: News from the French.” Journal of Family History 11: 193–203.Google Scholar
Moch, L., and Tilly, L. A. (1985) “Joining the urban world: Occupation, family, and migration in three French cities.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 27: 33–56.Google Scholar
Ostergren, R. C. (1982) “Kinship networks and migration: A nineteenth-century Swedish example.” Social Science History 6: 293–320.Google Scholar
Plakans, A. (1975) “Peasant farmsteads and households in the Baltic littoral, 1797.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 17: 2–35.Google Scholar
Pouyez, C., Roy, R., and Bouchard, G. (1981) “La mobilité géographique en milieu rural: Le Saguenay, 1852-1861.” Histoire Sociale 14: 123-56.Google Scholar
Ritchey, P. N. (1976) “Explanations of migration.” Annual Review of Sociology 2: 363–404.Google Scholar
Tilly, C., and Brown, C. H. (1967) “On uprooting, kinship, and the auspices of migration.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 8: 139-64.Google Scholar
Todd, E. (1975) “Mobilité géographique et cycle de vie en Artois et en Toscane au 18e siècle.” Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 30: 726-44.Google Scholar
Toney, M. B. (1976) “Length of residence, social ties, and economic opportunities.” Demography 13: 297–310.Google Scholar
Wilkening, E. A., Pinto, J. B., and Pastore, J. (1968) “Role of the extended family in migration and adaptation in Brazil.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 30: 689-95.Google Scholar