Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:17:12.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transition in Social Foundations for Collective Action

Communities in the Southeast Lancashire Textile Region in the 1820s and 1830s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Craig Calhoun
Craig Calhoun*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the 1820s and early 1830s, two largely different populations of working people lived alongside each other in the region surrounding Manchester. Today, they represent, in an important and clear contrast, the social foundations which have supported distinctive directions of popular protest and collective action. The theory of working-class radicalism, as developed by Marx and others, has tended to confound the two. The necessary radicalism and fundamental opposition to the growth of capitalist industry of more traditional communities of craft workers was wedded to the concentrated numbers of new industrial workers and the clarity of their exploitation by capitalists. This marriage took place in theory, but not in concrete social movements. The working class emerged as a foundation for basically reformist collective actions, while the radical and reactionary populist craftsmen lost the war of the industrial revolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , Fall 1980 , pp. 419 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. (1971) Family Structure in 19th Century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1976) “Sociological history and the working-class family: Smelser revisited,” Social History 6: 317–334.Google Scholar
Bamford, S. (1967) Passages in the Life of a Radical. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Berk, R. A. (1974) Collective Behavior. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. and Schoenherr, R. A. (1971) The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bythell, D. (1969) The Handloom Weavers. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. J. (1980) “Community: toward a variable conceptualization for comparative research.” Social History 5: 105–129.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. J. (forthcoming) Before the Working Class: Tradition and Community in English Popular Radicalism during the Industrial Revolution. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cole, G.D.H. (1932) Short History of the British Working Class Movement, 1789–1837. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cole, G.D.H. and Postgate, R. (1942) The Common People. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Collier, F. (1964) The Family Economy of the Working Classes in the Cotton Industry, 1784–1833. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Deane, P. and Cole, W. A. (1969) British Economic Growth, 1688–1959. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. M. and Lloyd-Jones, R. (1973) “N.J. Smelser and the cotton factory family: a reassessment,” pp. 309–319 in Harte, N. B. and Ponting, K. G. (eds.) Textile History and Economic History. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Foster, J. (1974) Class Struggle and the Industrial Revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Great Britain Parliamentary Papers (1834) 10, Report of the Select Committee on Handloom Weavers.Google Scholar
Great Britain Parliamentary Papers (1835) 35, First Report of the Commissioners under the Poor Law Amendment Act.Google Scholar
Great Britain Parliamentary Papers(1842) 22, Reports of the Inspectors of Factories (pp. 33–78, Appendix I: report of L. Horner).Google Scholar
Halevy, E. (1961) England in 1815. London: Benn.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. and Hammond, B. (1967) The Skilled Labourer. New York: Kelley.Google Scholar
Hart, J. K. (1969) “Entrepreneurs and migrants: a study of modernization among the Frafras of Ghana.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Hartwell, R. M. (1970) “Business management in England during the period of early industrialization: inducements and obstacles,” pp. 28–41 in Hartwell, R. M. (ed.) The Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1968) Labouring Men. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hunt, B. C. (1936) The Development of the Business Corporation in Britain, 1800–1867. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, C., , and Siegal, A. (1954) “The inter-industry propensity to strike,” pp. 189–212 in Kornhauser, A. (ed.) Industrial Conflict. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. (1969) The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Manchester Guardian (1824) 27 November.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. D. (1961) “The Lancashire rural labourer in the early nineteenth century.” Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 71.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. (1847) A Descriptive and Statistical Account of the British Empire. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. and Deane, P. (1962) Abstract of British Historical Statistics, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Oberschall, A. (1973) Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Payne, P. L. (1967) “The emergence of the large-scale company in Great Britain.” Econ. History Rev. 20: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinchbeck, I. (1930) Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1850. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Piven, F. F. and Cloward, R. A. (1977) Poor People’s Movements. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1965) The Genesis of Modern Management. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Read, D., (1958) Peterloo: The ‘Massacre’ and its Background. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Redford, A. (1976) Labour Migration in England, 1800–1850. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rudé, G. (1959) The Crowd in the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rushton, P. (1977) “Housing conditions and the family economy in the Victorian slum: a study of a Manchester district, 1790–1871.” Ph.D. dissertation, Manchester University.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. and Tilly, C. (1974) Strikes in France, 1830–1968. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, N. J. (1959) Social Change in the Industrial Revolution. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smelser, N. J. (1962) Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smelser, N. J. (1968) “Sociological history: the industrial revolution and the working class family,” pp. 76–91 in Essays in Sociological Explanation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Snyder, D. and Kelley, W. R. (1976) “Industrial violence in Italy, 1878–1903.” Amer. J. of Sociology 82: 131–162.Google Scholar
Soboul, A. (1958) Les Sans-Culottes Parisiens en l’An II. La Roche-sur-Yon: Potier.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1968) The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1964) The Vendée. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ure, A. (1861) The Cotton Manufacture of Great Britain. (Vols. I and II) London: H. G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Webb, S. and B., Webb (1920) History of Trade Unionism. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R. (1969) Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar