Andersen, N. A., Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2017) ‘A new approach to helping the hard-to-place unemployed: the promise of developing new knowledge in an interactive and collaborative process’, European Journal of Social Security, 19, 4, 335–52.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2011) ‘Policy work: street-level organisations under new managerialism’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i253–77.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013) ‘Work and the welfare state’, in Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G. (eds.), Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organisations and Workfare Policies, Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing, 3–16.
Carter, E. and Whitworth, A. (2015) ‘Creaming and parking in quasi-marketised welfare-to-work schemes: designed out of or designed into the UK Work Programme?’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 2, 277–96.
Caswell, D. and Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2015) ‘Responses from the frontline: how organisations and street-level bureaucrats deal with economic sanctions’, European Journal of Social Security, 1, 1, 31–51.
Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2017) ‘Frontline work in Danish activation policies’, in van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P. and Larsen, F. (eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe, New York: Routledge, 163–80.
Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., O’Sullivan, S. and Sol, E. (2015) Getting Welfare to Work: Street-Level Governance in Australia, the UK, and the Netherlands, New York: Oxford University Press.
Considine, M., O’Sullivan, S. and Nguyen, P. (2018) ‘The policymaker’s dilemma: the risks and benefits of a ‘black box’ approach to commissioning active labour market programmes’, Social Policy and Administration, 52, 1, 229–51.
Dean, H. (2003) ‘Re-conceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs’, Journal of Social Policy, 32, 3, 441–59.
Fuertes, V. and Lindsay, C. (2015) ‘Personalisation and street-level practice in activation: the case of the UK’s Work Programme’, Public Administration, 94, 2, 526–41.
McDonald, C. and Marston, G. (2005) ‘Workfare as welfare: governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state’, Critical Social Policy, 25, 3, 374–401.
Mead, L. (1997) The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty, Washington: Brookings Institute.
Patrick, R. (2017) ‘Whither social citizenship? Lived experiences of citizenship in/exclusion for recipients of out-of-work benefits’, Social Policy and Society, 16, 2, 293–304.
Rice, D. (2012) ‘Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation’, Administration and Society, 45, 9, 1038–62.
Rice, D. (2017) ‘How governance conditions affect the individualisation of active labour market services: an exploratory vignette study’, Public Administration, 95, 468–81.
Soss, J., Fording, R. C. and Schram, S. F. (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
van Berkel, R. (2013) ‘Triple activation: introducing welfare-to-work into Dutch social assistance’, in Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G. (eds.), Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organisations and Workfare Policies, Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing, 87–102.
van Berkel, R. (2014) ‘Quasi-markets and the delivery of activation: a frontline perspective’, Social Policy and Administration, 48, 2, 188–203.
Whitworth, A. and Carter, E. (2014) ‘Welfare-to-work reform, power and inequality: from governance to governmentalities’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22, 2, 104–17.