No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Other
- Information
- Series in Geology, Notes for Short Course , Volume 7: Sponges and Spongiomorphs , 1983 , pp. 201 - 220
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1983 University of Tennessee, Knoxville
References
Abbott, B. M.
1973. Terminology of stromatoporoid shapes. Journal of Paleontology, 47: 805–806.Google Scholar
Ayling, A.
1982. A redescription of Astrosclera willeyana Lister, 1900 (Ceratoporellida, Demospongiae), a new record from the Great Barrier Reef. Memoirs of the National Museum Victoria, 43: 99–103.Google Scholar
Bachmayer, F. and Flugel, E.
1961. Die “chaetetiden” aus dem Ober-Jura von Ernstbrunn (Niederösterreich) und Stramberg (ČSR). Palaeontographica, 116: 144–174.Google Scholar
Balsam, W. L. and Vogel, S.
1973. Water movements in archaeocyathids: evidence and implications of passive flow in models. Journal of Paleontology, 47: 979–984.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., Scotese, C. R. and Ziegler, A. M.
1980. Before Pangea: the geographies of the Paleozoic world. American Scientist, 68: 26–38.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S.
1927. A new Early Ordovician sponge fauna. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 17: 390–394.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S.
1932. The stratigraphy of the Central Basin of Tennessee. Bulletin of the Tennessee Division of Geology, 38: 268 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S.
1935. Descriptions of Paleozoic fossils from the Central Basin of Tennessee. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.
25: 403–409.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S.
1941. The Nevada Early Ordovician (Pogonip) sponge fauna. Proceedings of the U.S.
National Museum, 91(3126): 91–102.Google Scholar
Bebout, D. G., Schatzinger, R. A. and Loucks, R. G.
1979. Porosity distribution in the Stuart City trend, Lower Cretaceous, south Texas, p. B3–B25. In, Moore, C. H. (organizer), Geology of carbonate porosity. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Continuing Education Course Note Series 11, 246 p.Google Scholar
Bergquist, P. R. and Hartman, W. D.
1969. Free amino acid patterns and the classification of the Demospongiae. Marine Biology, 3: 247–268.Google Scholar
Bergquist, P. R. and Hogg, J. J.
1969. Free amino acid patterns in Demospongiae: a biochemical approach to sponge classification. Cahiers Biologique marin, 10: 205–220.Google Scholar
Billings, E.
1859. Fossils of the Calciferous sandrock, including some of the deposit of White Limestone at Mingan, supposed to belong to the formation. Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, and Proceedings of the Natural History Society, Montreal, 4(27): 345–346.Google Scholar
Billings, E.
1874. On some new or little known fossils from the Silurian and Devonian rocks of Ontario. Canadian Naturalist, (2)7: 230–240.Google Scholar
Birkhead, P. K. and Fraunfelter, G. H.
1973. Some Middle Devonian stromatoporoids from southern Illinois and southeastern Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 47: 1069–1076.Google Scholar
Bogoyavlenskaya, O. V.
1969. K postroeniyu klassifikatsii stromatoporoidei. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1969 (4): 12–27.Google Scholar
Bogoyavlenskaya, O. V.
1982. Stromatoporaty pozdnego devona-rannego karbona. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1982(1): 33–38.Google Scholar
Bogoyavlenskaya, O. V. and Boiko, E. V.
1972. Sistematicheskoye polozheniya stromatoporat. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1979(1): 22–35.Google Scholar
Boiko, E. V.
1970a. Pervyye svedeniya o pozdnetriasovykh stromatoporoideyakh Yugo-Vostochnogo Pamira. Paleontologischeskiy Zhurnal, 1970(2): 43–46.Google Scholar
Boiko, E. V.
1970b. Tri novykh roda pozdnetriasovykh stromatoporoidey Yugo-Vostochnogo Pamira. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1970(4): 46–51.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E.
1981. Ordovician and Silurian biostratigraphy, Anticosti Island, Quebec, p. 41–59. In, Lesperance, P. J. (ed.), I.U.G.S. Subcommision on Silurian Stratigraphy, Ordovician-Silurian Boundary Working Group, Field Meeting, Anticosti-Gaspe, Quebec 1981, Vol. II: Stratigraphy and Paleontology, 321 p.Google Scholar
Borojević, R.
1969. Etude du développement et de la différenciation cellulaire d'éponges calcaires calcinéennes (genres Clathrina et Ascandra). Annales d'Embryologie et de Morphogenèse, 3: 15–36.Google Scholar
Borojević, R.
1970. Différenciation cellulaire dans l'embryogenèse et la morphogenèse chez les spongiaires. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 25: 467–490.Google Scholar
Borojević, R.
1979. Evolution des Spongiaires Calcaires, p. 527–530. In, Lévi, C. and Boury-Esnault, N. (eds.), Colloques Internat. CNRS, No. 291.Google Scholar
Borojević, R. and Graat-Kleeton, G.
1965. Sur une nouvelle espèce de Sycon et quelques Démosponges récoltées par le “cirrus” dans l'Atlantique Nord. Beaufortia, 13 (154): 81–85.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S.
1864. A monograph of British Spongiadae, p. 1–290, Part I, p. 1–398, Part II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S.
1874. A monograph of the British Spongiadae. Vol. III. Ray Society, London. 367 p.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D.
1976. Early Cambrian intergrowths of archaeocyathids, Renalcis and pseudostromatolites from South Australia. Palaeontology, 19: 223–245.Google Scholar
Brien, P.
1973. Les Demosponges. Morphologie et reproduction, p. 131–461. In, Grassé, P. P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie. III. Spongiaires. Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Brien, P., Lévi, C., Sara, M., Tuzet, O. and Vacelet, J.
1973. Spongiaires. Grassé, P. P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie Masson et Cie, 3(1), 716 p.Google Scholar
Burchette, T. P. and Riding, R.
1977. Attached vermiform gastropods in Carboniferous marginal marine stromatolites and biostromes. Lethaia, 10: 17–28.Google Scholar
Burton, M.
1929. Descriptions of South African sponges collected in the South African Marine Survey, Part II–“The Lithistidae”–with a critical survey of the desma-forming sponges. Union of South Africa Fisheries and Marine Biology Survey, Report 7, Special Report II: 1–12.Google Scholar
Carter, H. J.
1875. Notes introductory to the study and classification of the Spongida. Part 1, Anatomy and physiology; Part 2, Proposed classification of the Spongida. Annals and Magazine of Natural of Natural History, 16(4): 1–40, 126–145, 177–200.Google Scholar
Carter, H. J.
1877. On the close relationship of Hydractinia, Parkeria, and Stromatopora with descriptions of new species of the former both recent and fossil. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (4)19: 44–76.Google Scholar
Carter, H. J.
1880. On Stromatopora dartingtoniensis, n.sp., with tabulation in the larger branches of the astrorhiza. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (5)6: 339–347.Google Scholar
Church, S. B.
1974. Lower Ordovician patch reefs in western Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 21(3): 41–62.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. M. and Stanton, R. J. Jr.
1983. Depositional environment of shelf carbonates - Lower Magdalena Group (Morrowan) in the Hueco Mountains, West Texas. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 15(1): 5.Google Scholar
Copper, P.
1974. Structure and development of Early Paleozoic reefs. Proceedings of the Second International Coral Reef Symposium 1, p. 365–386.Google Scholar
Croneis, C. and Toomey, D. F.
1965. Gunsight (Virgilian) wewokellid sponges and their depositional environment. Journal of Paleontology, 39: 1–16.Google Scholar
Cuif, J.-P.
1973. Mise en évidence des premiers sclérosponges fossiles dans le Trias des Dolomites. Comptes Rendus, Academie des Sciences, Paris, 277(D): 2333–2336.Google Scholar
Cuif, J.-P.
1974. Role des Sclérosponges dans la faune récifale du Trias des Dolomites (Italie du Nord). Geobios, 7: 139–153.Google Scholar
Cuif, J.-P., Debrenne, F., Lafuste, J. G. and Vacelet, J.
1979. Comparison de la microstructure du squelette carbonate non spiculaire d'éponges actuelles et fossiles, p. 459–465. In, Lévi, C. and Boury-Esnault, N. (eds.), Biologie des spongiaires, Colloques Internat. CNRS, No. 291.Google Scholar
Cuif, J.-P., Feuillée, P., Fischer, J.-C. and Pascal, A.
1973. Présence d'astrorhizes chez les Chaetetida mésozoiques. Compte Rendu Academiedes Sciences Paris
227 (D): 2473–2476.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W.
1879. On the microscopic structure of Stromatoporidae and on Paleozoic fossils mineralized with silicates in illustration of Eozoon. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearborn, J. H.
1967. Stanford University invertebrate studies on the Ross Sea 1958–61: General account and station list. In, Fauna of the Ross Sea, Part 5. General Account, Station Lists and Benthic Ecology, New Zealand Department Scientific and Industrial Research, 176: 1–76.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F.
1964. Archaeocyatha. Contribution à l'étude des faunes cambriennes du Maroc, de Sardaigne et de France. Serv. Mines Carte géol. Maroc, Notes & Mém., n° 179, 1: 1–265, 2: pl. 1–52.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F.
1969. Lower Cambrian Archaeocyatha from the Ajax mine, Beltana, South Australia. Bulletin British Museum (Natural History) (Geology), 17: 297–376.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F.
1974. Les Archéocyathes Irréguliers d'Ajax Mine (Cambrian inférieur, Australie du Sud). Bulletin Museum National d'Histoire naturelle, (3)195: 185–258.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F.
1975. Archaeocyatha from glacial erratics from the Dwyka Tillites (South Africa). Annals of the South African Museum, 67: 332–361.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F.
in press. Le genre chez les Archéocyathes du cambrien inférieur. Bulletin de la Societe Géologique de France, Séance du 2 mai
1983.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Rozanov, A. Yu. and Webers, G. F.
in press. Upper Cambrian Archaeocyatha from Antarctica. Geological Magazine.Google Scholar
Dehorne, Y.
1920. Les Stromatoporoides des terraines secondaires. Mémoires pour servir à l'explication de la carte géologique de la France. 1–161.Google Scholar
DeKoninck, L. G.
1877–1878. Recherches sur les fossiles paléozoiques de la Nouvelle Galles du Sud (Australie). Mémoires de la Societé royale des Sciences de Liège, (2)6: 1–135.Google Scholar
DeLaubenfels, M. W.
1936. The sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication
467: 1–225.Google Scholar
DeLaubenfels, M. W.
1953. Fossil sponges of Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 37: 105–117.Google Scholar
DeLaubenfels, M. W.
1955. Part E, Archaeocyatha and Porifera. In, Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 122 p.Google Scholar
Dendy, A.
1905. Supplementary Report 18, On the sponges, p. 57–246. In, Report on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar. Royal, Society of London, part 3.Google Scholar
Dendy, A.
1921. The tetraxonid sponge spicule. a study in evolution. Acta Zoologica Stockholm, 2: 95–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, A.
1922. Report of the Sigmatotetraxonida collected by H.M.S. “Sealark” in the Indian Ocean. Linnaean Society of London, series 2, vol. 18, Zoology, 164 p.Google Scholar
Dendy, A.
1924
(1925). On an orthogenetic series of growth forms in certain tetraxonid sponge spicules, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, (B)97: 234–250.Google Scholar
DeVries, D. A.
1955. Paleoecology and paleontology of a Chaetetes biostrome in Madison County, Iowa. University of Wisconsin. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Dieci, G., Antonacci, A.
Zardini, R. (1968) 1970. Le spugne cassiane (Trias medio-superiore) della regione dolomitica attorno a Cortina d'Ampezzo. Bolletino della Societa Paleontologica Italiano, 7: 94–155.Google Scholar
Dieci, G., Russo, A. and Russo, F.
1974a. Nota preliminare sulla microstruttura di spugne aragonitiche del trias medio-superiore. Bolletino della Societa Paleontologica Italiano, 13: 99–107.Google Scholar
Dieci, G., Russo, A. and Russo, F.
1974b. Revisione del genere Leiospongia d'Orbigny (Sclerospongia triassica). Bolletino della Societa Paleontologica Italiano, 13: 135–146.Google Scholar
Dieci, G., Russo, A., Russo, F. and Marchi, M. S.
1977. Occurrence of spicules in Triassic chaetetids and ceratoporellids. Bolletino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, 16: 229–238.Google Scholar
Doederlein, L.
1892. Über die Lithonina, eine nene Gruppe von Kalk-Schwämmen, Zoologische Jahrbuch, 10: 15–32.Google Scholar
De-yuan, Dong. 1982. Lower Ordovician stromatoporoids of northern Anhui. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 21: 579–582.Google Scholar
Doré, F. and Reid, F. E. H.
1965. Allonnia tripodophora nov. gen., nov. sp., nouvelle Éponge du Cambrien inférieur de Carteret (Manche). Compte Rendu sommaire des Séances, Societé Géologique de France, 1:20.Google Scholar
Duboscq, O. and Tuzet, O.
1936. Les amoebocytes et les cellules germinales des éponges calcaires. Mémoires, Museum Royale d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, (2)3: 209–226.Google Scholar
Duboscq, O. and Tuzet, O.
1937. L'ovogenèse, la fécondation et les premiers stades du développement des éponges calcaires. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Génerale, 19: 157–316.Google Scholar
Duboscq, O, and Tuzet, O.
1939. Les diverses formes des choanocytes des éponges calcaires hétérocoeles et leur signification. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Génerale, 80: 353–388.Google Scholar
Duboscq, O. and Tuzet, O.
1941. Sur les cellules en croix des Sycon (Sycon ciliatum Fabr., Sycon coronatum Ellis et Sol., Sycon elegans Bower) et leur signification. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Génerale, 81: 151–163.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M.
1879. On some spheroidal Lithistida Spongida from the Upper Silurian formation of New Brunswick. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (5)4: 84–91.Google Scholar
Dustan, P., Jaap, W. and Halas, J.
1976. The distribution of members of the class Sclerospongiae. Lethaia, 9: 419–420.Google Scholar
Embry, A. F. and Klovan, J. E.
1971. A Late Devonian reef tract on northeastern Banks Island, Northwest Territories. Bulletin, Canadian Petroleum Geologists, 19: 730–781.Google Scholar
Fagerstrom, J. A.
1982. Stromatoporoids of the Detroit River Group and adjacent rocks (Devonian) in the vicinity of the Michigan Basin. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, 339: 1–81.Google Scholar
Fagerstrom, J. A.
(in press). The ecology and paleoecology of the Sclerospongiae and Sphinctozoa (sensu stricto): a review. Bulletins of American Paleontology.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas Region. The siliceous sponges. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 120, article 1, 160 p.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1967a. The structure of Saccospongia laxata Bassler (Ordovician) and the phylogeny of the Demospongea. Journal of Paleontology, 41: 1137–1149.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1967b. Phylum Porifera Grant 1836, p. 333–341. In, Harland, W. B. (ed.), The fossil record, a symposium with documentation. Geological Society of London.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1967c. S. A. Miller's Paleozoic sponge families of 1889. Journal of Paleontology, 41: 803–807.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1970. The evolution and ecologic history of sponges during Palaeozoic times, p. 3–22. In, Fry, W. G. (ed.), The biology of the Porifera, Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1971a. A new Permian eutaxicladine demosponge, mosaic evolution, and the origin of the Dicranocladina. Journal of Paleontology, 45: 977–997.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M.
1971b. Sponge zonation in the West Texas Permian type section, p. 285–300. In, Dutro, J. T. Jr. (ed.), Paleozoic perspectives: A paleontological tribute to G. Arthur Cooper, Smithsonian Contributions in Paleobiology, No. 3.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M., and Thies, K. J. (MS). A Major Eocene sponge fauna (Castle Hayne Formation, North Carolina), 204 typescript pp., 7
text-figs., 51 pls.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. C.
1970. Revision et essai de classification des Chaetetida (Cnidaria) post-Paleozoiques. Annales Paleontologique Invertebres, 56: 151–220.Google Scholar
Flügel, E.
1975. Fossil Hydrozoen - Kenntnisstand und Probleme. Palaontologische Zeitschrift, 49: 369–406.Google Scholar
Flügel, H. W. and Flügel-Kahler, E.
1968. Stromatoporoidea. Fossilium Catalogus, I: Animalia
115, 116, 681 p.
Google Scholar
Flügel, H. W. and Flügel-Kahler, E.
1975. Stromatoporen aus dem Unteren Kohlenkalk (Tn lb, Strunium) von Aachen (Stromatoporen aus dem deutschen Palaozoikum 2). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 149: 1–38.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., and Wendt, J.
1977. Biostratinomy and paleoecology of the Cassian Formation (Triassic) of the Southern Alps. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 22: 257–323.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. J.
1957. Structure and classification of the Stromatoporoidea, Bulletins of American Paleontology
37(164): 345–480.Google Scholar
Gangloff, R. A.
1976. Archaeocyatha of eastern California and western Nevada, p. 19–30. In, Moore, J. N. and Fritsche, A. E. (eds.), Depositional environments of Lower Paleozoic rocks in the White-Inyo Mountains, Inyo County, California. Pacific Coast Paleogeography Field Guide 1, Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 69 p.Google Scholar
Gangloff, R. A.
1979. Archaeocyatha, p. 46–50. In, Fairbridge, R. W. and Jablonski, D. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Paleontology. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 886 p.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, C. G.
1968. First record of lithistid sponges in the Cambrian of Australia. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 92: 57–68.Google Scholar
Gerth, H.
1927. Die Spongien aus dem Perm von Timor. Jaarboek van het Mijnwesen Nederland-Oest Indien, Verhandelungen fur
1926: 99–132.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H.
1911. On some new genera and species of Pennsylvanian fossils from the Wewoka Formation of Oklahoma. Annual Report of the New York Academy of Science, 21: 212.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H.
1915. Fauna of the Wewoka Formation of Oklahoma. United States Geological Survey Bulletin
554, 270 p.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, , 1833. Petrefacta Germaniae, oder Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Länder. Eüsseldorf.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E.
1861. Tabular view of the primary divisions of the animal kingdom, intended to serve as an outline of an elementary course of recent zoology (cainozoology) or the natural history of existing animals. Walton and Maberly, London.Google Scholar
Gray, D. I.
1980. Spicule pseudomorphs in a new Palaeozoic chaetetid, and its sclerosponge affinities. Palaeontology, 23: 803–820.Google Scholar
Gwinner, M. P.
1976. Origin of the Upper Jurassic limestones of the Swabian Alb (southwest Germany). Contributions to Sedimentology, 5: 1–75.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M.
1899
(1898). A memoir on the Paleozoic reticulate sponges constituting the family Dictyospongiidae. Memoir, New York State Museum, 2: 1–197.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. (ed.). 1973. Atlas of Paleobiogeography. Elsevier Scientific, New York, N. Y., 531 p.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D.
1958. A re-examination of Bidder's classification of the Calcarea. Symstematic Zoology, 7: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, W D.
1969. New genera and species of coralline sponges (Porifera) from Jamaica. Postilla, 137: 1–39.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D.
1979. A new sclerosponge from the Bahamas and its relationship to Mesozoic stromatoporoids, p. 467–474. In, Lévy, C. and Boury-Esnautt, N. (eds.), Biologie des Spongiaires, Colloques internat. CNRS, 291.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D.
1980. Systematics of the Porifera, p. 24–35. In, Hartman, W. D., Wendt, J. W. and Wiedenmayer, F., Living and Fossil Sponges. Notes for a short course. Sedimenta 8, University of Miami, Miami.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D. and Goreau, T. E.
1970. Jamaican coralline sponges: their morphology, ecology and fossil relatives, p. 205–243. In, Fry, W. G. (ed.), The biology of the Porifera, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 25, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D. and Goreau, T. E.
1972. Ceratoporella (Porifera: Sclerospongiae) and the chaetetid “corals”. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Science
44: 133–148.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D. and Goreau, T. E.
1975. A Pacific tabulate sponge, living representative of a new order of sclerosponges. Postilla
167: 1–21.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D. and Goreau, T. E.
1976. A new ceratoporellid sponge (Porifera: Sclerospongiae) from the Pacific, p. 329–347. In, Harrison, F. W. and Cowden, R. R. (eds.), Aspects of sponge biology, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D., Wendt, J. W., and Wiedenmayer, F.
1980. Living and Fossil Sponges (Notes for a short course). Sedimenta, 8: 1–274.Google Scholar
Heinrich, M.
1914. Studien in den Riffkalken des Rheinischen oberen Mittledevons Pt. III, Dissertation Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat, Bonn. Freiberg.Google Scholar
Hickson, S. J.
1934. On Gypsina plana and on the systematic position of the stromatoporoids. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society, new series, 303(76): 433–480.Google Scholar
Hill, D.
1965. Archaeocyatha from Antarctica and a review of the phylum: Trans. Antarctic Expedition 1955–1958, Sci. Rept., n°
10 (Geol. N° 3): 151 p., 25 text-fig., 12 pl., Trans Antarctic Expedition Commission (London).Google Scholar
Hill, D.
1972. In, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E, v. 1 (Teichert, C. ed.): 158 p., Geological Society of America - University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hill, D.
1981. Rugosa and Tabulata. In, Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata, Supplement 1: Lawrence Kansas, University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J.
1884
(1883), Catalogue of the fossil sponges in the Geological Department of the British Museum (Natural History), London, 248 pp.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J.
1887–1912. A monograph of the British fossil sponges. London, Palaeontographical Society, part 2: 93–188.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J.
1893. Fossil Sponges Part III, Sponges of Jurassic Strata, p. 189–254, Palaeontographical Society
London.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J.
1900. Some remarkable calcisponges from the Eocene Strata of Victoria (Australia). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 56: 50–66.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F.
1951. Lower Ordovician detailed stratigraphic sections for western Utah. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin
39, 98 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F.
1952. Lower Ordovician trilobites from western Utah and eastern Nevada. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin
48, 249 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D. and Sturgeon, M. T.
1968. The genus Wewokella (Porifera) in the Pennsylvanian of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 42: 81–83.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F.
1957. The Australian Devonian sponge, Devonospongia clarkei (de Koninck). Bulletin of the Wagner Free Institute of Science, 32(2): 13–16.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H.
1940. The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. McGraw-Hill, New York. 726 p.Google Scholar
Ijima, I.
1927. The Hexactinellida of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie, 6: 383 p.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Goreau, T. F. and Hartman, W. D.
1971. Recent brachiopod-coralline sponge communities and their paleoecological significance. Science, 173: 623–625.Google Scholar
James, N. P.
1978a. Facies models II. Reefs, p. 121–132. In, Walker, R. G. (ed.), Facies models, Geological Association of Canada, Waterloo.Google Scholar
James, N. P. and Kobluk, D. R.
1978. Lower Cambrian patch reefs and associated sediments: southern Labrador, Canada. Sedimentology, 25: 1–35.Google Scholar
Jameson, J.
1980. Depositional environments in the Petershill Formation Bathgate, West Lothian: University of Edinburgh, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H.
1961. Limestone-building algae and algal limestones. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 297 p.Google Scholar
Jones, W. C.
1956. Colloidal properties of the mesogloea in species of Leucosolenia. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 97: 269–285.Google Scholar
Jones, W. C.
1965. The structure of the porocytes in the calcareous sponge Leucosolenia complicata (Montagu). Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 85: 53–62.Google Scholar
Jones, W. C.
1970. The composition, development, form and orientation of calcareous sponge spicules. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 25: 91–123.Google Scholar
Jones, W. C.
1979. The microstructure and genesis of sponge biominerals, p. 425–447. In, Lévi, C. and Boury-Esnault, N., eds., Biologie des Spongiaires, Colloques Internat. CNRS, No. 291.Google Scholar
Jones, W. C., and Jenkins, D. A.
1970. Calcareous sponge spicules: a study of magnesian calcites. Calcified Tissue Research, 4: 314–329.Google Scholar
Jordan, R.
1969. Deutung der astrorhizen der Stromatoporoidea (?Hydrozoa) als Borenspuren. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte (1969)
12: 705–711.Google Scholar
Kapp, U. S.
1975. Paleoecology of Middle Ordovician stromatoporoid mounds in Vermont. Lethaia, 8: 195–207.Google Scholar
Kapp, U. S. and Stearn, C. W.
1975. Stromatoporoids of the Chazy Group (Middle Ordovician), Lake Champlain, Vermont and New York. Journal of Paleontology, 49: 163–186.Google Scholar
Kay, M. and Crawford, J. P.
1964. Paleozoic facies from the miogeosynclinal to the eugeosynclinal belt in thrust slices, central Nevada. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 75: 425–454.Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, J.
1969. A new interpretation of astrorhizae in the Stromatoporoidea. Acta Palaeontologia Polonica, 14: 499–535.Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, J.
1971. Morphogenesis and systematics of the Devonian Stromatoporoidea from the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland. Acta Palaeontologia Polonica, 26, 146 p.Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, J.
1974. Lower Cretaceous sclerosponges from the Slovakian Tatra Mountains. Palaeontology, 17: 341–347.Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, J.
1976. Cyanophycean nature of stromatoporoids. Nature, 264(5581): 49–51.Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, J.
1979. Sclerosponge nature of chaetetids evidenced by spiculated Chaetetopsis favrei (Deninger 1906) from the Barremian of Crimea. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte
1979: 97–108.Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, J.
1981. Evidences for cyanophyte origin of stromatoporoids, p. 230–241. In, Monty, C. (ed.), Phanerozoic Stromatolites. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kempen, T. M. G. van. 1978. Anthaspidellid sponges from the Early Paleozoic of Europe and Australia. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 156: 305–337.Google Scholar
Kershaw, S.
1980. Cavities and cryptic faunas beneath non-reef stromatoporoids. Lethaia, 13: 327–338.Google Scholar
Kershaw, S.
1981. Stromatoporoid growth form and taxonomy in a Silurian bioherm, Gotland. Journal of Paleontology, 55: 1284–1295.Google Scholar
Khalfina, V. K. and Yavorsky, V. I.
1973. Klassifikatsiya stromatoporoidey. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2: 19–34.Google Scholar
King, R. H.
1943. New Carboniferous and Permian sponges. Bulletin of the Geologic Survey of Kansas, 47: 1–36.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R.
1900. Description of sponges from Funafuti. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (7)
6: 345–363.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R.
1908. On two new genera of recent pharetronid sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (8)
2: 503–514.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R.
1910. On a remarkable pharetronid sponge from Christmas Island. Royal Society of London, Proceedings, 83: 124–133.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R.
1911. On Merlia normani a sponge with a siliceous and calcareous skeleton. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 56: 657–702.Google Scholar
Klappa, C. F.
1980. Community succession within lowermost Middle Ordovician sponge-rich bioherms from western Newfoundland. Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, 12(2): 46.Google Scholar
Kobluk, D. R.
1981a. The record of cavity-dwelling (coelobiontic) organisms in the Paleozoic. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18: 181–190.Google Scholar
Kobluk, D. R.
1981b. Lower Cambrian cavity-dwelling endolithic boring sponges. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18: 972–980.Google Scholar
Kobluk, D. R.
1981c. Cavity-dwelling biota in Middle Ordovician (Chazy) bryozoan mounds from Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18: 42–54.Google Scholar
Kobluk, D. R., James, N. P. and Pemberton, S. G.
1978. Initial diversification of macroboring ichnofossils and exploitation of the macroboring niche in the Lower Paleozoic. Journal of Paleontology, 42: 163–170.Google Scholar
Kotila, D. A.
1973. Algae and paleoecology of algal and related facies, Morrow Formation, northeastern Oklahoma. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma. In Wray, J. L., Developments in palaeontology and stratigraphy, 4: Calcareous algae, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1977.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D.
1983. Middle Cambrian “Archaeocyathus” from the Georgina Basin is an anthaspidellid sponge. Alcheringa, 7: 49–58.Google Scholar
Lafuste, J.
1970. Lames ultra-minces a faces polies. Procédé et application à la microstructure des Madréporaires fossiles. Compte Rendu Séances Academie des Sciences Paris, 270: 679–681.Google Scholar
Lafuste, J.
1974. Amélioration de la technique des lames ultra-minces. Emploi: 1) de l'oxyde de cerium, 2) du ‘cavity cleanser’. Compte Rendu Séances Société Géologique France, 16: 55–56.Google Scholar
Lagneau-Hérenger, L.
1962. Contribution a l'etude des spongiaires siliceux du Cretace inferieur. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, 95, 252 p.Google Scholar
Lang, J. C., Hartman, W. D. and Land, L. S.
1975. Sclerosponges: primary framework constructors on the Jamaican deep fore-reef. Journal of Marine Research, 33: 223–231.Google Scholar
Lawn, I. D., Mackie, G. O. and Silver, G.
1981. Conduction system in a sponge. Science, 211: 1169–1171.Google Scholar
Lecompte, M. J.
1956. Stromatoporoidea, p. F107–F144. In, Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America, and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Ledger, P. W.
1974. Types of collagen fibres in the calcareous sponges Sycon and Leucandra. Tissue and Cell, 6: 385–389.Google Scholar
Ledger, P. W. and Jones, W. C.
1977. Spicule formation in the calcareous sponge Sycon ciliatum. Cell Tissue Research, 181: 553–567.Google Scholar
Lévi, C.
1973. Systématique de la classe des Démospongiaria (Demosponges), p. 577–631. In, Grassé, P. P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie, Masson et Cie., Paris, 3, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Lister, J. J.
1900. Astrosclera willeyana, the type of a new family of sponges. Willeys Zoological Results, 4: 459–482.Google Scholar
Lokke, D. H.
1964. Calcareous spicules in Talpaspongia clavata R. H. King, Lower Permian of Concho County, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 38: 778–781.Google Scholar
Lustig, L. D.
1971. Mid-Pennsylvanian chaetetids (Tabulata), from the Bird Springs Formation in southern Nevada. University of California at Los Angeles, unpublished M.S. thesis, 147 pp.Google Scholar
Mackie, G. O.
1979. Is there a conduction system in sponges?, p. 145–151. In, Levi, C. and Boury-Esnault, N. (eds.), Biologie des spongiaires, Colloques Internat. CNRS. 291.Google Scholar
Mackie, G. O.
1981. Plugged syncytial interconnections in hexactinellid sponges. Journal of Cell Biology, 91: 193a.Google Scholar
Mackie, G. O., Lawn, I. D. and Pavans de Ceccatty, M.
(In press.)
Studies on hexactinellid sponges. II. Excitability, conduction and coordination of responses in Rhabdocalyptus dawsoni (Lambe, 1873). Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, B301.Google Scholar
Mackie, G. O. and Singla, C. L.
(in press). Studies on hexactinellid sponges. I. Histology of Rhabdocalypterus dawsoni (Lambe, 1873). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B301.Google Scholar
Mathewson, J. E.
1977. Chaetetids and their paleoenvironment in the Amoret Limestone Member (Desmoinesian) of Labette County, Kansas. Kansas State University, unpublished M.S. thesis, 148 p.Google Scholar
Meyer, F. O.
1981. Stromatoporoid growth rhythms and rates. Science, 213 (4510): 894–895.Google Scholar
Middlemiss, F. A., Rawson, P. F. and Newell, G. (eds.). 1969. Faunal Provinces in space and time. Geological Journal, Special Issue 4, 213 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A.
1889. Class Porifera, p. 152–167. In, North American geology and paleontology. Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. A.
1896. Suggestions for a natural classification of the Asconidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (6)
18: 349–362.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. A.
1900. Sponges, p. 1–178. In, A treatise on zoology, Lankester, E. R. (ed.), Part II. The Porifera and Coelentera. Adam and Charles Black, London.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. A.
1910. Sponge spicules: A summary of present knowledge. Ergebnisse und Fortschrift Zoologie, 2: 171–274.Google Scholar
Moret, L.
1924. Contribution a l'étude des Spongiaires siliceux du Miocène de L'Algérie. Mémoires Société de Géologique de France, n. ser., 1, 28 p.Google Scholar
Moret, L.
1928. Les Spongiaires silliceux du Callovien de La Voultesur-Rhone (Ardèche), p. 123–140. In, Roman, F., Études sur le Callovien de la Vallee du Rhone: Travaux du Laboratoire de Géologie de la Faculte des Sciences de Lyon, Memoire 11, fascicule 13.Google Scholar
Moret, L.
1952. Embranchement des Spongiaires (Porifera, Spongiata), p. 333–374. In, Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paleontologie, 1, Masson et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Mori, K.
1970. Stromatoporoids from the Silurian of Gotland, Part 2. Stockhom Contributions in Geology, 22, 152 p.Google Scholar
Mori, K.
1976. A new recent sclerosponge from Ngargol, Palau Islands and its fossil relatives. Science Reports, Tohoku University, Sendai, series 2.
46: 1–9.Google Scholar
Mori, K.
1977. A calcitic sclerosponge from the Ishigaki-shima coast, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Science Reports, Tohoku University, Sendai, series 2, 47: 1–5.Google Scholar
Mori, K.
1980. Revision of the Permian “stromatoporoids” reported from Japan. Paleontological Society of Japan, Transactions and Proceedings, New Series, 117: 237–241.Google Scholar
Mori, K.
1982. Coelenterate affinity of stromatoporids. Stockholm Contributions to Geology, Hessland volume, 167–179.Google Scholar
Nestor, H. A.
1964. Stromatoporoidei ordovika i llandoveri Estonii. Institut Geologi Akademii Nauk Estonskoi SSR, 112 p.Google Scholar
Nestor, H. A.
1974. 0 fillogenii paleozoiskikh stromatoporoidei, p. 27–38. In, Sokolov, B. S. (ed.), Drevnie Cnidara, Vol. I. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, Trudy, 201, 364 p.Google Scholar
Nestor, H. A.
1981. The relationship between stromatoporoids and heliolitids. Lethaia, 14: 21–25.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D.
1935. Some Mid-Pennsylvanian invertebrates from Kansas and Oklahoma, II, Stromatoporidae, Anthozoa and Gastropoda. Journal of Paleontology, 9: 341–355.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A.
1886–92. A monograph of the British stromatoporoids, parts 1–4. Palaeontographical Society
39, 42, 44, 46: 1–234.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. and Murie, J.
1878. On the minute structure of Stromatopora and its allies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14: 187–246.Google Scholar
Okada, Y.
1928. On the development of a hexactinellid sponge, Farrea sollasii, Tokyo University, Journal of the Faculty of Sciences, Section 4, Zoology, 2: 1–27.Google Scholar
Okulitch, V. J.
1936. On the genera Heliolites, Tetradium, and Chaetetes. American Journal of Science, 5th Ser., 32(191): 361.Google Scholar
Okulitch, V. J. and Bell, W. G.
1955. Gallatinospongia, a new siliceous sponge from the Upper Cambrian of Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology, 29: 460–461.Google Scholar
Oppliger, . 1915. Die spongien der Birmensdorferschichten des schweizerischen Jura. Abhandlungen du Schweizerische Paläontologische Gesellschaft, 40: 1–84.Google Scholar
Ota, M.
1968. The Akiyoshi Limestone Group: a geosynclinal organic reef complex. Bulletin of the Akiyoshi-dai Science Museum, No. 5.Google Scholar
Ott, E.
1967. Segmentierte Kalkschwämme (Sphinctozoa) aus der alpinen Mitteltrias und ihre Bedeutng als Riffbildner im Wettersteinkalk. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physikallischen Klasse, N. F., 131: 1–96.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. J., and Fürsich, F. T.
1981. Ecology of sponge reefs from the Upper Bathonian (Middle Jurassic) of Normandy. Palaeontology, 24: 1–23.Google Scholar
Parks, J. M.
1977. Paleoecological evidence on the origin of the Dry Canyon Pennsylvanian bioherms, p. 27–41. In, Pray, L. C. et al. (leaders), Geology of the Sacramento Mountains, Otero County, New Mexico. West Texas Geological Society, Field Trip Guidebook, 230 p.Google Scholar
Parks, W. A.
1935. Systematic position of the Stromatoporoidea. Journal of Paleontology, 9: 18–29.Google Scholar
Parks, W. A.
1936. Devonian stromatoporoids of North America. University of Toronto Studies, Geological Series, 6: 1–52.Google Scholar
Parona, C. F.
1933. Le spugne della fauna permiana di Palazzo Adriano (Bacino di Sosio) in Sicilia. Societa Geologica Italiana, Memorie, 1: 1–58.Google Scholar
Pavans de Ceccatty, M.
1974. Coordination in sponges: the foundations of integration. American Zoologist, 14: 895–903.Google Scholar
Pavans de Ceccatty, M.
1982. In vitro aggregation of syncytia and cells of a Hexactinellida sponge. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 6: 15–22.Google Scholar
Pavans de Ceccatty, M. and Mackie, G. O.
1982. Genèse et évolution des interconnexions syncytiales et cellulaires chez une Éponge Hexactinellide en cours de réagrégation après dissociation in vitro. Compte Rendu Academie de Sciences Paris, 294
(ser. 3): 939–944.Google Scholar
Petryk, A. A.
1982. Aulacerid ecostratigraphy of Anticosti Island, and its bearing on the Ordovician-Silurian boundary and the Upper Ordovician glacial episode. Third North American Paleontological Convention, Proceedings, 2: 393–399.Google Scholar
Pickett, J.
1982. Vaceletia progenitor, the first Tertiary sphinctozoan (Porifera). Alcheringa, 6: 241–247.Google Scholar
Pickett, J.
1969. Middle and Upper Palaeozoic sponges from New South Wales. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of New South Wales, Palaeontology, 16, 24 p.Google Scholar
Pickett, J. and Rigby, J. K.
1983. Sponges from the Early Devonian Garra Formation, New South Wales. Journal of Paleontology, 57: 720–741.Google Scholar
Pitcher, M.
1971. Middle Ordovician reef assemblages. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, Chicago, 1969, J: 1341–1357.Google Scholar
Pomel, A.
1872. Paleontologie ou description des animaux fossiles de la Province d'Oran, Zoophytes 5e Fascicule - Spongiaires, Oran, 256 pp.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, L.
1972. Les Spongiaires des grottes sous-marines de la région de Marseille: Ecologie et Systematique. Tethys, 3: 717–758.Google Scholar
Rauff, H.
1913. Barroisia und die Pharetronenfrage. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 1: 75–144.Google Scholar
Rauff, H.
1937. (Sponges), p. 7–14. In, Assman, P., Revision der Fauna der Wirbellosen der oberslesischen Trias, mit einem Beitrag über die Spongien von H. Rauff. Preussische Geologische Landesanstalt, Abhandlungen, 170.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. and Okultich, V. J.
1940. Some Chazyan sponges. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College, 86: 197–214.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1957a. On Hexactinellida, “Hyalospongea” and the classification of siliceous sponges. Journal of Paleontology, 31: 282–286.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1957b. Notes on hexactinellid sponges - II. Dactylocalyx Stutchbury and the Family Dactlyocalycidae Gray, Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (12) 10: 821–826.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1958a. A monograph of the Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Part I: i–xlvi, Palaeontographical Society, London.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1963a. Preliminary notice of a classification of the Demospongia. Irish National Journal, 14: 90–94.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1963b. Hexactinellida or Hyalospongea. Journal of Paleontology, 37: 232–243.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1963c. A classification of the Demospongia. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte
4: 196–207.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1964. The Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, p. xlix–cliv, Palaeontographical Society, London.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1967. Hyalostelia Zittel and the Heteractinellida. Geological Magazine, 104: 398–399.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1968a. Hyalostelia smithii (Young and Young) and the sponge genus Hyalostelia Zittel (Class Hexactinellida). Journal of Paleontology, 32: 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1968b. The Carboniferous sponge “Doryderma” dalryense Hinde (Class Demospongia) and the origin of heloclones and megaclones. Journal of Paleontology, 42: 1249–1252.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1968c. Tremacystia, Barroisia and the status of Sphinctozoida (Thalamida) as Porifera. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, 34: 1–10.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1968d. Microscleres in demosponge classification. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper
35: 1–37.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1968e. Bathymetric distributions of Calcarea and Hexactinellida in the present and in the past. Geological Magazine, 105: 546–559.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H.
1970. Tetraxons and demosponge phylogeny, p. 63–89. In, Fry, W. G. (ed.), The biology of the Porifera, Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Reif, W. E. and Robinson, J. A.
1976. On functional morphology of the skeleton in lychnisc sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Palaontologische Zeitschrift, 50: 57–59.Google Scholar
Reimann, I. G.
1945. New Middle Devonian octactinellids. Paleontological Contributions, Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences Bulletin, 19(2): 16–21.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H. M.
1971. The axial symmetry of sponge spicules and its phylogenetic significance. Cahiers de Biologique Marin, 12: 505–514.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H. M.
1979. Histology of Hexactinellida (Porifera), p. 173–180. In, Lévi, C. and Boury-Esnault, N. (eds.), Biologie des Spongiaires, Colloques Internat., CNRS, No. 291.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H. M. and Brown, M. J.
1977. The central cells of sponges. Zoomorphologie, 88: 81–94.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H. M. and Mackie, G. O.
(In press.)
Studies on hexactinellid sponges. III. The taxonomic status of Hexactinellida within the Porifera. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Londons B
301.Google Scholar
Rezvoi, P. D., Zhuravleva, I. T. and Koltun, V. M.
1971. Phylum Porifera. Fundamentals of Paleontology, 1(2): 5–97. (translation)
Google Scholar
Richardson, E. S. Jr.
1950. A Middle Devonian octactinellid sponge from New York. Fieldiana: Geology, 10: 79–88.Google Scholar
Riding, R. and Kershaw, S.
1978. Parameterization of stromatoporoid shapes. Lethaia, 11: 233–242.Google Scholar
Rietschel, S.
1968. Die Octactinellida und ihnen verwandte palaozoische Kalkschwämme (Porifera, Calcarea). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 42: 13–32.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1965. Evolution of Lower and Middle Ordovician sponge reefs in western Utah. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 68: 51–52.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1967a. Two new Early Paleozoic sponges and the sponge-like organism, Gaspespongia basalis Parks, from the Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 41: 766–776.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1967b. A new polyactinal sponge from the Antelope Valley Formation (Ordovician) in the Toquima Range, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 41: 511–515.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1970. Ellesmerespongia feildeni, a new Permian sponge from the Canadian Arctic. Journal of Paleontology, 44: 1143–1145.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1971. Sponges and reef and related facies through time. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, J: 1374–1388.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1976a. A new Devonian heteractinid sponge from southwestern Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 13: 120–124.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1976b. Devonian sponges from the Canning Basin reef complexes of Western Australia. Abstracts for the XXV International Geologic Congress, Australia, 1: 294.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1976c. Some observations on occurrences of Cambrian Porifera in western North America and their evolution. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 23(2): 51–60.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1977a. Two new Middle Ordovician sponges from Foxe Plain, southeastern District of Franklin. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 269: 121–129.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1977b. Constellatospongia, a new heteractinid astraeosponge from the Upper Ordovician Churchill River Group, Manitoba. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 269: 131–137.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1978a. Two wewokellid calcareous sponges in North America. Journal of Paleontology, 52: 705–716.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1978b. Porifera of the Middle Cambrian Wheeler Shale, from the Wheeler Amphitheater, House Range, in western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 52: 1325–1345.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1981a. Cambrian sponges of the North American Cordilleran region, p. 181–183. In, Taylor, E. M. (ed.), Short Paper for the Second International Cambrian Symposium. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report, 81(743).Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1981b. Cambrian sponges of the North American Cordilleran formations in Canada and the United States. Abstracts, Geological Association of Canada, 6: A46.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1981c. The sponge fauna of the Eocene Castle Hayne Limestone from east-central North Carolina. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 16: 123–144.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K.
1983. Sponges of the Middle Cambrian Marjum Limestone from the House Range and Drum Mountains of western Millard County, Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 57: 240–270.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Bayer, T. N.
1971. Sponges of the Ordovician Maquoketa Formation in Minnesota and Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 45: 608–627.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Bryant, T. L. P.
1979. Fossil sponges of the Mississippian Fort Payne Chert in northeastern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 53: 1005–1012.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Chamberlain, C. K. and Black, B. A.
1970. Mississippian and Pennsylvanian sponges from the Quachita Mountains of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 44: 816–832.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Dixon, O. A.
1979. Sponge fauna of the Upper Silurian Read Bay Formation, Somerset Island, District of Franklin, Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 53: 587–627.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Lenz, A. C.
1978. A new Silurian astylospongid sponge from Baillie-Hamilton Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 15: 157–162.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Moyle, R. W.
1959. Some Mississippian and Pennsylvanian sponges from Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 33: 399–403.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Nitecki, M. W.
1975. New Archaeoscyphia (Porifera) from Ordovician of Anticosti Island, Quebec. Fieldiana: Geology, 33(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Nitecki, M. W.
1975. An unusually well preserved heteractinid sponge from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois and a possible classification and evolutionary scheme for the Heteractinida. Journal of Paleontology, 49: 329–339.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Schumacher, D. and Meader, S. J.
1979. The genus Ensiferites, a Devonian astraeosponge of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 53: 475–493.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Terrell, F. M.
1973. Permian sponges from western Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 10: 1431–1443.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Toomey, D. F.
1978. A distinctive sponge spicule assemblage from organic buildups in the Lower Ordovician of southern Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 52: 501–506.Google Scholar
Roemer, F.
1860. Die Silurischen Fauna des westlichen Tennessee, ein paleontologische Monographie. Breslaw, 100 p.Google Scholar
Root, R. B.
1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecological Monograph, 97: 317–350.Google Scholar
Rosen, F. B.
1867. Über der natur der Stromatoporen und über der Erhaltung der Hornfaser der Songien im fossilen Zustande. Russiche mineralogische gessellschaft, St. Petersburg (2)
4: 1–98.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J.
1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in northeastern Utah and its trilobite faunas. Yale Peabody Museum Bulletin
6, 161 p.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. M.
1981a. Archaeocyathid reefs of the southern Great Basin, western United States, p. 193–197. In, Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Short papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System. United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 81–743.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. M.
1981b. Archaeocyathid bioherms in the Lower Poleta Formation, Esmeralda County, Nevada, p. 44–50. In Taylor, M. E. and Palmer, A. R. (eds.), Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology of the Great Basin and vicinity, western United States. Guidebook for Field Trip 1. United States Geological Survey and International Union of Geological Sciences, Denver, Colorado, 182 p.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu.
1974. Homological variability of Archaeocyathans. Geological Magazine, 111: 107–120.Google Scholar
St. Jean, J. Jr.
1967. Maculate tissue in Stromatoporoidea. Micropaleontology, 13: 419–444.Google Scholar
St. Jean, J. Jr.
1971. Paleobiologic considerations of reef stromatoporoids. North American Paleontological Convention, Chicago, Proceedings J: 1389–1429.Google Scholar
Savelle, J. M.
1979. Upper Silurian stromatoporoids from Somerset Island, Arctic Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 16: 364–372.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O.
1870. Grundzuge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, p. i–iv, 1–88.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A.
1910, 1912. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwest-deutschland. I. Teil. Tetraxonia, Monaxonia und Silicea incertae sedis
(1910); II. Teil. Triaxonia (Hexactinellida) (1912). Palaeontolgraphica, Supplement 5, 385 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A.
1924. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwest-deutschland III. und letzter Teil. Monographien zür Geologie und Palaeontologie, Berlin, (1)2: 159 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A.
1936. Die Kieselspongien des Oberen Jura von Suddeutschland. Palaeontographica, 84: 149–194; 85: 1–114.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E.
1887. Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. The Voyage of H.M.S.
Challenger, Zoology, 21: 1–514.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K.
1969. Unter- und mittelkambrische Porifera (Chancelloriida und Hexactinellida). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 43: 15–147.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A.
1961. Die Spinctozoa, eine Gruppe fossiler Kalkschwämme, Akademie der wissenschaften und der Literatur Abhandlungen der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physi k allischen Klasse, 1961: 721–790.Google Scholar
Seimiradzki, J.
1913. Les spongiaires Jurassiques de la Pologne. Paléontologica Pologne, 1: 1–50.Google Scholar
Solomko, E.
1885. Vorlaufige Mitteilung uber die microstrucktur der stromatoporen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Palaeontologie, 2: 168–171.Google Scholar
Spaw, J. M.
1977. Paleo-environments of Middle Pennsylvanian Chaetetes lithotypes, Texas and New Mexico. Rice University
unpublished M.S. thesis.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1961. Devonian stromatoporoids from the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Journal of Paleontology, 35: 932–948.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1972. The relationship of the stromatoporoids to the sclerosponges. Lethaia, 5: 369–388.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1975b. Stromatoporoid assemblages, Ancient Wall reef complex (Devonian), Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 12: 1631–1667.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1980. Classification of Paleozoic stromatoporoids. Journal of Paleontology, 54: 881–902.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1982a. The unity of the Stromatoporoidea. Proceedings of the Third North American Paleontological Convention, Montreal: 511–516.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1982b. The shapes of Paleozoic and modern reef builders: a critical review. Paleobiology
8: 228–241.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W.
1983. Stromatoporoids from the Blue Fiord Formation (Lower Devonian) of Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 57.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G.
1882. Pharetronen-Studien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, p. 139–191.Google Scholar
Stel, J. H.
1978. Studies on the paleobiology of favositids. Dissertation, University of Groningen. 247 p.Google Scholar
Stel, J. H.
1980. Morphology of the Silurian demosponges Desmidopora Nicholson and Nodulipora Lindstrom: affinities of favositids. In, Festschrift zu Ehren von Professor Dr. Alexander von Schouppe (geb. 26.2.1919). Oekentorp, Klemens, ed. Muenstersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Palaeontologie, 52: 29–79.Google Scholar
Stock, C. W.
1979. Upper Silurian (Pridoli) Stromatoporoidea of New York. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 76: 289–389.Google Scholar
Stock, C. W.
1980. Systematic position of the Stromatoporoidea within phylum Porifera. Geological Society of American, Abstract with Programs, 12: 210.Google Scholar
Stock, C. W.
1981. Cliefdenella alaskaensis n. sp. (Stromatoporoidea) from the Middle/Upper Ordovician of central Alaska. Journal of Paleontology, 55: 998–1005.Google Scholar
Stock, C. W.
1982. Upper Devonian (Frasnian) Stromatoporoidea of north-central Iowa: Mason City Member of the Shell Rock Formation. Journal of Paleontology, 56: 654–679.Google Scholar
Termier, H. and Termier, G.
1977. Structure et évolution des Spongiaires hypercalcifiés du Paléozoique Supérieur. Mémoir Institut Géologique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 29: 57–109.Google Scholar
Termier, H., Termier, G. and Vachard, D.
1977. Monographie paléontologique des affleurements Permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Sud Tunisien). Palaeontographica A
156: 1–109.Google Scholar
Toomey, D. E. and Ham, W. E.
1967. Pulchrilamina, a new mound-building organism from Lower Ordovician rocks of west Texas and southern Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 41: 981–987.Google Scholar
Toomey, D. E. and Nitecki, M. H.
1979. Organic buildups in the Lower Ordovician (Canadian) of Texas and Oklahoma. Fieldiana: Geology, New Series, 2, 181 p.Google Scholar
Topsent, E.
1928. Une Mycaline productrice de desmas Desmatiderma arbuscula, n. g., n. sp. Bulletin de l'Institut Oceanographic, Monaco, 519: 1–8.Google Scholar
Trammer, J.
1982. Lower to Middle Oxfordian sponges of the Polish Jura. Acta Geologica Polonica, 32: 39 p.Google Scholar
Tripp, K.
1929. Untersuchung uber den Skelettbau von Hydractinia zur einer vergleichenden Betrachtung der Stromatoporen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Palaeontologie, B62: 467–508.Google Scholar
Tschernyschew, T. and Stepanov, P.
1916. Obercarbon Fauna von Konig Oskars und vom Heibergs Land. In Report of the second Norwegian arctic expedition in the “Fram” 1898–1902, Oslo, 45: 1–67.Google Scholar
Turnšek, D.
1969. Prispevek k paleoekoligii jurskih hidrozojev v Solveniji. Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Razprave, 12: 209–237.Google Scholar
Turnšek, D.
1970. Kredni hidrozoji z Zlatibora v zahodni Srbiji. Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Razprave, 13: 193–208.Google Scholar
Tuzet, O.
1964. L'origine de la lignée germinale et la gametogénèse chez les Spongiaires, p. 79–111. In, Wolff, E. (ed.), L'origine de la lignée germinale chez les vértebrés et chez quelques groups d'invértébrés, Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
Tuzet, O.
1973. Éponges Calcaires, p. 27–132. In, Grassé, P. P., (ed.), Traité de Zoologie, 3 fasc. 1, 27–132. Masson et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Tuzet, O. and Connes, R.
1964. Sur la présence de lophocytes chez le Sycon. Compte Rendu Academie des Sciences Paris
258: 4142–4143.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H.
1928. Geology of Anticosti Island. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir
154: 481 p.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O.
1889. Preliminary description of new Lower Paleozoic sponges. American Geologist, 3:233–248.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O.
1890. American Paleozoic sponges. Geological Survey of Illinois, 8(2): 209–241, 243–251.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. and Everett, E. O.
1889. Description of Lower Silurian sponges. Geological Survey of Illinois, 8(2): 253–282.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1961. Quelques éponges remarquables de Méditerranée. Revue des Travaux de l'Institut des Pêches Maritimes, 25: 351–354.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1964. Etude monographique de l'Éponge Calcaire Pharétronide de Mediterranée, Petrobiona massiliana Vacelet et Levi. Les Pharétronides actuelles et fossiles, Recueil des Travaux aux de la Station Marine d'Endoume, 50(34): 1–125.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1967. Quelques éponges pharétronides et “silico-calcaires” de grottes sous-marines obscures. Recueil des Travaux aux de la Station Marine d'Endoume, 42(58): 121–132.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1970. Les éponges Pharétronides actuelles, p. 189–204. In, Fry, W. G. (ed.), The biology of the Porifera, Zoological Society of London Symposium, 25, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1977a. Éponges Pharétronides actuelles et Sclérosponges de Polynésie francaise, de Madagascar et de la Réunion. Bulletin Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, (3)444: 345–368.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1977b. Une nouvelle relique de Secondaire, un représentant actuel des éponges fossils Sphinctozoaires. Compte Rendu, Academie des Sciences, Paris, (D)285: 509–511.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1979. Déscription et affinités d'une éponge sphinctozoaire actuelle, p. 483–493. In, Levi, C. and Boury Esnault, N. (eds.), Biologie des Spongiaires, Colloques Internat., CNRS, 291.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1980. Squelette calcaire facultatif et corps de régénération dans le genre Merlia, éponges apparentées aux Chaetétidés fossiles. Compte Rendu Academie des Sciences, Paris, 290 D: 227–230.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J.
1981. Éponges hypercalcifiées (“Pharétronides”, Sclérosponges”) des cavités des récifs coralliens de Nouvelle-Caledonie. Bulletin Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. (4)3: 313–351.Google Scholar
Vandercammen, A.
1950. Contribution a l'étude des spongiaires heteractinellides. Institut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Bulletin, 26(9): 1–23.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, W. J. E.
1969. Carboniferous Sphinctozoa from the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen, 42: 239–257.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, A. P.
1953. The elementary chemical composition of marine organisms. Memoirs, Sears Foundation for Marine Research, 2: 674 p.Google Scholar
Vlasov, A. N.
1967. 0 rode Altaicyathus Vologdin. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal.
1967(1): 120.Google Scholar
Vologdin, A. G.
1932. Arkheotsiaty Sibiri, vyp. 2, Geologiya i razvedka. Izdatel (N.K.I.P.) (Moskva, Leningrad): 106 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D.
1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67(6): 261–364.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D.
1969. Ordovician stromatoporoids from New South Wales. Palaeontology, 12: 637–662.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D.
1980. Biogeography of Ordovician stromatoporoids. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 32: 1–19.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D. and Banks, M. R.
1976. Clathrodictyon and Ecclimadictyon (Stromatoporoidea) from the Ordovician of Tasmania. Royal Society of Tasmania, Papers and Proceedings, 110: 129–137.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D. and Morris, D. G.
1976. New Ordovician stromatoporoids from New South Wales. Royal Society of New South Wales, Journal and Proceedings, 109: 125–135.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W.
1934. A new species of stromatoporoid from the Buda Limestone of central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 8: 169–170.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W.
1970. Problems of annual and daily growth-rings in corals, p. 3–9. In, Runcorn, S. K. (ed.), Palaeogeophysics, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Wendt, J.
1974. Der Skelettbau aragonitischer Kalkschwämme aus der alpinen Obertrias. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1974: 498–511.Google Scholar
Wendt, J.
1975. Aragonitisch Stromatoporen aus der alpinen Obertrias. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen
150: 111–125.Google Scholar
Wendt, J.
1978. Skelettbau und Entwicklung der massiven Kalkschwämme vom Jungpalaeozoikum bis in die Gegenwart. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 157: 91–98.Google Scholar
Wendt, J.
1979. Development of Skeletal formation, microstructure, and mineralogy of rigid calcareous sponges from the late Palaeozoic to Recent, pp. 449–457. In, Lévi, C. and Boury-Esnault, N. (eds.), Biologie des spongiaires, Colloques Internat., CNRS, No. 291.Google Scholar
Wiedenmayer, F.
1974. Recent marine shallow-water sponges of the West Indies and the problem of speciation. Verhandlungen Naturforschande Gesellschaft Basel, 80(1): 361–375, (Festschrift H. G. Kugler).Google Scholar
Wiedenmayer, F.
1980. Siliceous sponges. Development through time, p. 58–85. In, Hartman, W. D., Wendt, J. W. and Wiedenmayer, F., Living and Fossil Sponges. Sedimenta, 8, University of Miami.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. C.
1963. The tabulate coral Multithecopora Yoh from the Chaetetes-Profusulinella faunizone in eastern Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 37: 157–163.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. C., Waines, R.H. and Coogan, A. H.
1963. A new species of Komia Korde and the systematic position of the genus. Palaeontology, 6: 246–253.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. L.
1950. An Upper Cambrian pleospongid (?). Journal of Paleontology, 24: 591–593.Google Scholar
Winston, D. II.
1963. Stratigraphy and carbonate petrology of the Marble Falls Formation, Mason and Kimble Counties, Texas. University of Texas, Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Woodland, W.
1905. Studies in spicule formation. 1. The development and structure of the spicules in Sycons: with remarks on the conformation, modes of disposition and evolution of spicules in calcareous sponges generally. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 49: 231–282.Google Scholar
Wray, J. L.
1971. Geology of calcareous algae, notes for a short course. Sedimenta I: 5–1 to 5–6. University of Miami, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
Wyatt, D. J.
1979. Carbonate mud mounds from the Lower Ordovician Wah Wah Limestone of the Ibex area, western Millard County, western Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 26(2): 101–114.Google Scholar
Yavorsky, V. I.
1967. Stromatoporoidea Sovetskogo Soyuza, Part 5. Ministerstvo Geologii SSSR, Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo, Geologicheskogo Institute (VSEGEI), Trudy, Novaya Seriya, 148, 119 p.Google Scholar
Zeise, O.
1906. Über die Miocäne Fauna Algeriens. Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin, Sitzungsberichte, Physikallischen-Mathematisch Klasse, 20: 941–961.Google Scholar
Zeise, O.
1907. Nachtrag zu meiner Mitteilung “Über die Miocäne Spongienfauna Algeriens”, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 1906, p. 941–961, Zentralblatt für mineralogie 1907, p. 317–318.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T.
1960. Arkheotsiaty Sibirskoy platformy. Akademia Nauk SSSR (Moskva), 344 p.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T.
1966. Rannenkembriyskie organogennye postroyki na territorii Sibirskoe platformy, p. 61–84. In, Organizm i sreda v geologich eskom proshlom. Nauka
Moskva.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T.
1968. Biogeografiya i geokhronologiya rannego kembriya po arkheotsiatam: XXII Sessiya Mezhdunaradnogo geologicheskogo Kongressa, 1968, Doklady Sovetskikh geologov, 3. Problemy Paleontologii, p. 33–44.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. and Elkina, V. N.
1974. Arkheotsiaty Sibiri, Izdat. Nauka, sibirskoe otdel., Trudy, Geologiya i Geofizika (Moskva), 230: 167 p.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. and Miagkova, E. I.
1972. Archaeata - novaya grupa organismov. In Dokl. Sov. Geologov k XXIV sessii Mezhdunakh. geol. kongr., Problema 7, Paleontologiya - Nauka: 7–14.Google Scholar
Zhuraleva, I. T. and Okuneva, O. G.
1981. 0 prirode Kribritsiat. In Problematica fanerozoya, Izdatel Nauka (Moskva): 23–30.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Bambach, R. K., Parrish, J. T., Barrett, S. F., Gierlowski, E. H., Parker, W. C., Raymond, A. L. and Sepkoski, J. J.
1981. Paleobiogeography and climatology, p. 231–266. In, Niklas, K. J. (ed.), Paleobotany, paleoecology, and evolution. Praeger, New York, N.Y.
Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Parrish, J. T., and Scotese, C. R.
1981. Cambrian world paleogeography, biogeography and climatology, p. 252. In, Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Short papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System, United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 81–743.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Scotese, C. R., McKerrow, W. S., Johnson, M. E., and Bambach, R. K.
1979. Paleozoic paleogeography. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 7: 473–502.Google Scholar
Ziegler, B.
1964. Die Cortex der fossilen Pharetronen (Kalkschwämme), Eclogae geologae Helvetica, 57: 803–822.Google Scholar
Ziegler, B. and Rietschel, S.
1970. Phylogenetic relationships of fossil calcisponges, p. 23–40. In, Fry, W. G. (ed.), The biology of the Porifera, Zoological Society of London Symposium 25.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1877. Studien über fossile Spongien, i. Hexactinellidae. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physikallischen Klasse, 13: 1–63.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1878. Studien über fossile Spongien, Zweiter Abtheilung. Lithistidae; Dritte Abtheilung. Monactinellidae, Tetractinellidae und Calcispongiae. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse, 2: 1–138.Google Scholar