Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T17:57:49.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed biology and technology: At the crossroads and beyond. Introduction to the Symposium on Seed Biology and Technology: Applications and Advances and a prospectus for the future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Kent J. Bradford  and
Marc A. Cohn
Kent J. Bradford
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616–8631, USA
Marc A. Cohn
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-0001, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The papers in this special section of Seed Science Research are products of a symposium on Seed Biology and Technology: Applications and Advances, held in Fort Collins, Colorado, on 13–16 August, 1997. The symposium was convened as a cooperative effort of Regional Research Project W-168 within the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cooperative States Research, Extension and Education Service (CSREES) system. Regional Research Projects are authorized by the Hatch Act, which established the Agricultural Experiment Station (AES) system in the United States (US Code). This is a system in which land-grant institutions in each state conduct research and education programmes relevant to agriculture, the environment and society. Regional Research projects are a mechanism ‘for cooperative research in which two or more State agricultural experiment stations are cooperating to solve problems that concern the agriculture of more than one state.’ Such projects ‘can provide the solution to a problem of fundamental importance or fill an important gap in our knowledge from the standpoint of the present and future agriculture of the region’

Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 153 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P S and Meyer, S E (1998) Ecological aspects of seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 8, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, (1997) Big companies tell of a high-tech future at Iowa conference. Seed & Crops Digest 48, 26–27.Google Scholar
Bewley, J D (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9, 1055–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, K J (1995) Water relations in seed germination. pp 351–396in Kigel, J, Galili, G (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Bradford, K J (1996) Population-based models describing seed dormancy behaviour: implications for experimental design and interpretation. pp 313–339in Lang, G A (Ed.) Plant dormancy: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Wallingford, UK, CAB INTERNATIONAL.Google Scholar
Bradford, K J (1997) The hydrotime concept in seed germination and dormancy. pp 349–360in Ellis, R H, Black, M, Murdoch, A J, Hong, T D (Eds) Basic and applied aspects of seed biology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, K J and Trewavas, A J (1994) Sensitivity thresholds and variable time scales in plant hormone action. Plant Physiology 105, 1029–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chastain, T and Young, W C III (1998) Vegetative plant development and seed production in cool-season perennial grasses. Seed Science Research 8, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrispeels, M, Grossi, M F, da Sa, and Higgins, T J V (1998) Genetic engineering with α-amylase inhibitors makes seeds resistant to bruchids. Seed Science Research 8, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R (1976) The selfish gene. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dumas, C and Mogensen, H L (1993) Gametes and fertilization: maize as a model system for experimental embryogenesis in flowering plants. Plant Cell 5, 1337–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R H and Roberts, E H (1981) The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Science and Technology 9, 373–409.Google Scholar
Evans, I M, Croy, R R D, Brown, P and Boulter, D (1980) Synthesis of complementary DNAs to partially purified mRNAs coding for the storage proteins of Pisum sativum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 610, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evenari, M (1984) Seed physiology: its history from antiquity to the beginning of the 20th century. Botanical Review 50, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, R B, Hoscheck, G, Tam, S H, Ditta, G S and Breidenback, R W (1981) Abundance, diversity, and regulation of mRNA sequence sets in soybean embryogenesis. Developmental Biology 83, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, A G (1973) The rate of germination. pp 391–409in Heydecker, W (Ed.) Seed ecology. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Grooms, L (1997) Basic seed research needs ASRF's continued efforts. Seed & Crops Digest 48, 28–29, 33.Google Scholar
Khan, A A (1992) Preplant physiological seed conditioning. Horticultural Reviews 14, 131–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T S (1977) The essential tension. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, E S (1996) The new genomics: global views of biology. Science 274, 536–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasrallah, J B and Nasrallah, M E (1993) Pollen-stigma signaling in the sporophytic self-incompatibility response. Plant Cell 5, 1325–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbigin, E, Anderson, M A and Clarke, A E (1993) Gametophytic self-incompatibility systems. Plant Cell 5, 1315–1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, A E, Crowe, J H and Crowe, L M (1998) Methods for dehyration-tolerance: depression of the phase transition temperature in dry membranes and carboyhdrate vitrification. Seed Science Research 8, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, Y, Dennis, D E, Klomparens, K and Somerville, C (1992) Polyhydroxybutyrate, a biodegradable thermoplastic, produced in plants. Science 256, 520–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E H (1961) Dormancy of rice seed. I. The distribution of dormancy periods. Journal of Experimental Botany 12, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Still, D W and Bradford, K J (1997) Endo-β-mannanase activity from individual tomato endosperm tissues in relation to germination. Plant Physiology 113, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A G, Allen, P S, Bennett, M A, Bradford, K J, Burris, J S and Misra, M K (1998) Seed enhancements. Seed Science Research 8, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A G and Harman, G E (1990) Concepts and technologies of selected seed treatments. Annual Review of Phytopathology 28, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoreau, H D (1993) Faith in a seed: the dispersion of seeds and other late natural history writings. Dean, B P (Ed.) Washington, DC. Island Press/Shearwater Books.Google Scholar
United States Code. Title 7, Chapter 14.Google Scholar
Walters, C (1998) Understanding the mechanics and kinetics of seed aging. Seed Science Research 8, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J D and Crick, F H C (1953) Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature 171, 737–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed