Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:20:02.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy and Life in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy: Three Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2014

Richard Sorabji
Richard Sorabji*
Affiliation:
Wolfson College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophy, in the ancient Graeco-Roman world, and in various other cultures too, was typically thought of as, among other things, bearing on how to live. Questions of how to live may now be considered by some as merely one optional specialism among others, but Derek Parfit for one, we shall see, rightly treats implications for how to live as flowing naturally from metaphysical theories. In the hope of showing something about the ancient Graeco-Roman tradition as a whole, I shall speak of things that I and others have said before,1 but I will highlight certain aspects of how the various groups or individuals related their philosophy to their lives. I shall start with the ancient Stoics as providing a clear case, then move on more briefly to their rivals, the Epicureans, and finally, more briefly again, to consider their predecessors and successors in other ancient schools and periods. This will not be a survey of the main central doctrines, although that is also something useful to attempt. But it will involve a selection of important ideas to illustrate their application to how to live.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 74: Philosophical Traditions , July 2014 , pp. 45 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Sorabji, Gandhi and the Stoics (henceforth Gandhi) (Oxford, 2012), 58–61.Google Scholar

3 Cicero On Ends 3.14.48; Plutarch On Common Notions 1063A; Gandhi 116–7

4 Cicero On Duties 1.46

5 Cicero On Laws 3.14

6 Cicero On Duties 1.9; 3.7

7 Different from ‘Who am I?’ is the question ‘What sort of person do I want to be?’. This belongs not so much with Panaetius' subject of making right decisions (kathêkonta), as with the further objective of reaching virtue.

8 Cicero On Duties 1. 107–121

9 Cicero On Ends 3.2.7

10 Hadot, Pierre, ‘Philosophy as a way of life’, in his Philosophy as a Way of Life (Blackwell, Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar, Ch. 11, page 272, translated from the French of Exercises spirituels et philosophie antique (Paris, 1981).

11 Epictetus Discourses 1.2; Miriam Griffin, Seneca, A philosopher in Politics (Oxford University Press, paperback 1992), 363, citing Tacitus Annals 16.22

12 Seneca On Anger 2.2–4

13 Sorabji, Richard, Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar, Chs 15 and 16

14 Williams, Bernard, ‘Stoic philosophy and the emotions: a reply to Richard Sorabji’, in Sorabji, Richard, ed., Aristotle and After, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, supplementary volume 68 (1997), 211–13Google Scholar, available from http://events.sas.ac.uk/support-research/publications/596

15 Galen, That states of mind follow the chemistry of the body, 67, 2–16

16 The other is Galen, On the diagnosis and therapy of the distinctive passions of the individual's soul.

17 `Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 7.121

18 Epictetus, Discourses 4.1

19 Epictetus, Discourses 4.4, 1–2

20 Epictetus, Discourses 1.1.23

21 Epictetus Discourses 3.3.14–19

22 1958, first printed in Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press), reprinted in his Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry (Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Sorabji, Richard, Gandhi and the Stoics (Oxford and Chicago University Presses, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Ch. 3

24 Hierocles Elements of Ethics, excerpts preserved in Stobaeus Florilegia, ed. Hense, 4.671,7–673,11, partly translated in D.N. Sedley, A.A. Long., The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar, Ch. 57, text G.

25 Relevant texts are cited in Sorabji, Richard, ‘Just war from ancient origins to the Conquistadors debate and its modern relevance’, in Sorabji, Richard, Rodin, David, eds, The Ethics of War: Shared Problems in Different Traditions (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2006)Google Scholar, 18.

26 Epicurus Key Doctrines 31–7; Hermarchus ap. Porphyry On Abstinence, 1.7.1–1.12.7, but the reference in 1.7.1 to fellow feeling as one factor may be a comment by Porphyry. Lucretius inserts a stage of monogamy, families, winsome children and friendships as leading to contracts, On the nature of things, 5.1011–27

27 Matthew 10:29; Luke 12:6.

28 Cicero On the nature of the gods 2. 167

29 Annas, Julia, The Morality of Happiness (Oxford University Press 1993), Ch. 5, on Marcus especially pages 175–6Google Scholar

30 On this see Paul Rabbow, Seelenführung (Munich, 1954)

31 I am here following Arnold I. Davidson's quotation from a work of Pierre Hadot's, in the introduction to a set of Hadot's papers, translated by Chase, Michael and edited by himself, Philosophy as a Way of Life (Blackwell, Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar. The collection contains a translation of some of the most relevant articles at chapters 3 and 11, but Davidson is here referring to several other papers by him and quoting one of them.

32 Plutarch On Stoic Self-Contradictions, 1035A ff

33 Brunschwig, Jacques, ‘On a book title by Chrysippus, “On the fact that the ancients admitted dialectic along with demonstrations”’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, supplementary vol. (1991) 81–96Google Scholar; developed by Annas, Julia, The Morality of Happiness (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar, Ch. 4; Betegh, Gabor, ‘Cosmological ethics in the Timaeus and early Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24 (2003), 273–302Google Scholar, and others.

34 Lucretius On the nature of things 3. 59–97; 1053–70

35 Epicurus Key Doctrines 2; Stoics in Cicero On Ends 3.16

36 Lucretius On the nature of things 2.972–7

37 Sorabji, Richard, Time, Creation and the Continuum (Duckworth:London, 1983Google Scholar; repr. Chicago University Press, 2006; Bloomsbury London, 2012), 176–9; Warren, James, Facing Death, Epicurus and his Critics (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1984), corrected 1987, 174–7Google Scholar; 186. I discuss his view in Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life and Death (Oxford and Chicago University Presses, 2006), Ch. 15.

39 Sorabji, Richard, Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life and Death, 337–341Google Scholar

40 Seneca, Letters 97, 15–16; Cicero, On ends 2.16.53

41 Cicero, On ends 2.22.71

42 Lucretius On the Nature of Things, Book 3, lines 1011–1024

43 Cicero, On Ends 1.16.51

44 Seneca, Letters 25.5

45 Seneca, Letters 11.8–10

46 Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments, Part III, Ch. 1

47 Philodemus, Rhetoric II, frg. 11, lines 1–9 (Sudhaus), 139–40

48 Philodemus, On frank criticism, frg. 41

49 Philodemus, On frank criticism, col. XIIa, line 5

50 Philodemus, On frank criticism, frg. 67. I thank David Sider for showing me the emendation.

51 Empedocles, Fragment 137, Diels-Kranz

52 A powerful case was made by Catherine Osborne, now Rowett, in ‘Empedocles Recycled’, Classical Quarterly 37 (1987), 24–50Google Scholar. She saw the ethical theme of purification as dominant.

53 Alain Martin, Oliver Primavesi, L'Empédocle de Strasbourg, Introduction, édition et commentaire (De Gruyter, 1999)

54 Porphyry, On Abstinence 1.26; Life of Pythagoras 15; Diogenes Laertius Lives of eminent philosophers 8.12, disbelieved by Iamblichus, On the Pythagorean Life 5.25

55 Porphyry, On Abstinence 1.36; Iamblichus On the Pythagorean Life 21.96

56 References in my Emotion and Peace of Mind (Oxford University Press, 2000), 213–4Google Scholar

57 Timaeus frag. 13a Jacoby; Schol. on Plato Phaedrus 279C; Diogenes Laertius Lives 8.10 and 23; 10.11; Iamblichus On the Pythagorean Life paragraph 72. 17

58 Richard Sorabji, Gandhi and the Stoics, 147

59 Plato Republic 531C

60 Marwan Rashed, Nellie Wallace lectures (Oxford University, 2013), partly explained in his ‘Plato's Five Worlds hypothesis (Ti 55cd)’, in Riccardo Chiardonna, Gabriele Galluzzo, eds, Universals in Ancient Philosophy (Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2013), 87–112

61 Christopher Gill, ‘Peace of mind and being yourself: Panaetius to Plutarch’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 2.36.7, 4599–4640.

62 Warren, James, Epicurus and Democritean Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2002), 58–72Google Scholar

63 Plato Gorgias 521A-D

64 Plato Crito 52A-D

65 Plato Timaeus 90 A-D

66 Seneca On Anger 3.13.3; Plutarch On freedom from anger 455A-B

67 Plato Phaedo 64A

68 Plato Republic 500 D; 611A–612A

69 Sorabji, Richard, Introduction to Aristotle Transformed, (Duckworth, London, 1990)Google Scholar

70 Plato Phaedrus 243E–257B

71 Burnyeat, Myles, ‘Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul’, in Smiley, Timothy, ed., Mathematics and Necessity, Proceedings of the British Academy vol. 103 (Oxford University Press), 1–81Google Scholar; Marwan Rashed will, ‘Plato's five worlds hypothesis (Tim 55 c-d), mathematics and universals’, in R. Chiaradonna, G. Galluzzo, eds, Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Pisa 2013, pp. 87–112.

72 Aristoxenus, Elementa Harmonica II I, 30, 20–31, 2, Meibom

73 Plato Republic 357A ff.

74 Plato Protagoras 358 B-E

75 Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 7.3, 1147b15–17

76 Plato Republic 474D–475A

77 Lucretius On the nature of things 4. 1160–70; Ovid Art of Love 2. 657–62; Remedies of Love 325–30

78 Plato, Gorgias 494B

79 Seneca, Letters 12.9; 101, 10; On Benefits 7.2.4–6; Marcus Aurelius Meditations 2.5; 7.69

80 Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Book 6, 1142a23–30; 1143a35-b5; 1144a28–31; 1143b11–14

81 Sorabji, Richard, Self, 233–9Google Scholar

82 Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 1.3, 1095a 1–13

83 References in Richard Sorabji, The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 AD, vol. 1, Ch. 15a

84 I owe these points about his own reasons to G. Fay Edwards, The Puzzle of Porphyry's Rational Animals, PhD dissertation (King's College, London, 2012); and ‘The puzzle of Porphyry's rational animals: a new interpretation of On Abstinence from Animal Food’, in preparation. Porphyry's book is translated by Gillian Clark, (Duckworth, London, 2000, and Bloomsbury, London, 2011).

85 Available in English translation.

86 The Sentences is available in English translation.

87 Sorabji, Richard, Self, 118–126.Google Scholar

88 Olympiodorus, Commentary on Plato's First Alcibiades 204, 3–11, discussed in Michael Griffin's introduction to his translation, vol. 1, (Bloomsbury, London, forthcoming).

89 In Sorabji, Richard, Time, Creation and the Continuum (Duckworth, London, 1983Google Scholar, Chicago University Press 2006, Bloomsbury, London 2013), Chs 13–14; (ed.) Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science (Duckworth, London, 1987) extensively updated 2nd edition, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, supplementary volume 103 (2010) available http://events.sas.ac.uk/support-research/publictions/ 815, and eventually from Wiley-Blackwell; with some new proposals on dating and authorship of works, in (ed.) Aristotle Transformed (2nd edition, Bloomsbury, London, 2014).