Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:37:13.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wittgenstein: Whose Philosopher?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

G. E. M. Anscombe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the ways of dividing all philosophers into two kinds is by saying of each whether he is an ordinary man's philosopher or a philosophers' philosopher. Thus Plato is a philosophers' philosopher and Aristotle an ordinary man's philosopher. This does not depend on being easy to understand: a lot of Aristotle's Metaphysics is immensely difficult. Nor does being a philosophers' philosopher imply that an ordinary man cannot enjoy the writings, or many of them. Plato invented and exhausted a form: no one else has written such dialogues. So someone with no philosophical bent, or who has left his philosophical curiosity far behind may still enjoy reading some of them.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 28 , March 1990 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)