Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T17:39:50.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research on frog-inspired swimming robot driven by pneumatic muscles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2021

Jizhuang Fan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150080, China
Shuqi Wang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150080, China
Yi Wang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150080, China
Ge Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150080, China
Jie Zhao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150080, China
Gangfeng Liu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150080, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: liugangfeng@hit.edu.cn

Abstract

This article designs a frog-inspired swimming robot based on pneumatic muscles. The musculoskeletal characteristics of the frog are refined and used as the basis for the design of the robot joint structure and movement mode. The posture adjustment module, joint water seal, and power system are designed to meet the robot’s motion requirements, and the structure optimization design of the robot is completed by combining simulation analysis. The body length of the robot is about 710 mm, and the overall mass is 10 kg. Combining the structural characteristics of the robot, the control system is built to realize the frog-like motion. The robot’s propulsion speed is about 0.6 m/s, the propulsion distance reaches 2.4 m, the turning angle is 30°, and the turning radius is 0.6 m. The prototype experiment verifies the rationality of the frog-inspired swimming robot structure design and the reliability of the control system and water seal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Li, Z., Progress in marine geophysical exploration. Reading the World (23), 358 (2016).Google Scholar
Lu, C., Sun, J. and Song, Q., Dynamics and simulation analysis of the frog-like robot in the take-off phase. Appl Sci Technol. 000(001), 5155 (2016).Google Scholar
Ceurstemont, S., Cyborg ray made of rat cells is driven by light. New Scientist. 231(3082), 2125 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., Liu, X., Guo, S., Xu, J. and Yan, N., Bionic Propulsion Hydrofoil Cooperative Technology. Robot. 2011(05), 519527.Google Scholar
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., Mattoli, V., Cianchetti, M. and Dario, P., Design and Development of a Soft Actuator for a Robot Inspired by the Octopus Arm. Neuroimage. 77(12), 133147 (2009).Google Scholar
Thomas, A. P., Milano, M., G’Sell, M. G., Fischer, K. and Burdick, J., Synthetic jet propulsion for small underwater vehicles[C]//Robotics and Automation, 2005. ICRA 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2005, 453(4), 181–187.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Sun, J., Dai, J., Yuan, J. and Xu, Y., Research on Motion Simulation Technology of Bionic Underwater Robot. J Syst Simul. 17(1), 1115 (2005).Google Scholar
Yue, C., Guo, S. and Shi, L., Design and performance evaluation of a biomimetic microrobot for the father-son underwater intervention robotic system. Microsyst Technol. 22(4), 831840 (2015).Google Scholar
Li, Y., Guo, S. and Yue, C., Preliminary concept of a novel spherical underwater robot. Int J Mechatron Autom. 5(1), 1121 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, L., Guo, S., Mao, S., Li, M. and Aaaka, K., Development of a lobster-inspired underwater microrobot. Int J Adv Robot. Syst. 10(1), 115 (2013).Google Scholar
Pu, H., Sun, Y., Ma, S. and Gong, Z., Experimental Study on Oscillating Paddling Gait of an Eccentric Paddle Mechanism[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Guangzhou, China, December 11–14, (2012) pp. 187–192.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. and Ma, S., Decoupled Kinematic Control of Terrestrial Locomotion for an ePaddle-Based Reconfigurable Amphibious Robot[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Shanghai, (2011) pp. 1223–1228.Google Scholar
Guo, W., Yu, Y. and Yu, J., Control System Design of the Wheel-Paddle-Leg Integration Amphibious Robot[C]//Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Jinan, China, July 6–9 (2010) pp. 6428–6432.Google Scholar
Nagaoka, K., Otsuki, M., Kubota, T. and S. Tanaka, Terramechanics based propulsive characteristics of mobile robot driven by archimedean screw mechanism on soft soil[C]//IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Taipei, (2010) pp. 4946–4951.Google Scholar
Pandey, J., Reddy, N. S., Ray, R. and Shome, S. N., Multi-Body Dynamics of a Swimming Frog - A Co-Simulation Approach[C]// IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. IEEE, (2013) pp. 842–847.Google Scholar
Pandey, J., Reddy, N. S., Ray, R. and Shome, S. N., Biological swimming mechanism analysis and design of robotic frog[C]// IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. IEEE, (2013) pp. 1726–1731.Google Scholar
Tang, Y., Qin, L., Li, X., Chew, C. M. and Jian, Z., A frog-inspired swimming robot based on dielectric elastomer actuators[C]// Ieee/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, (2017) pp. 2403–2408.Google Scholar
Richards, C. T., The kinematic determinants of anuran swimming performance: an inverse and forward dynamics approach. J Exp Biol. 2008(211), 31813194.Google Scholar
Fan, J., Qiu, Y., Zhang, W. and H. Wang, Mechanism design of frog-like swimming robot. Robot, 2015(2), 168175.Google Scholar
Fan, J., Zhang, W., Kong, P., Cai, H. and Liu, G., Design and Dynamic Model of a Frog-Inspired Swimming Robot Powered by Pneumatic Muscles. Chin J Mech Eng. (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonell, P., Jiang, Z. P. and Repperger, D. W., Nonlinear control of a pneumatic muscle actuator: backstepping vs. sliding-mode[C]//Control Applications, 2001. (CCA01). Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2001:167–172.Google Scholar
Chan, S. W., Lilly, J. H., Repperger, D. W. and J. E. Berlin, Fuzzy PD+ I learning control for a pneumatic muscle[C]//Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ03. The 12th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2003, 1:278–283.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, A., Sawodny, O., Neumann, R. and A Hartmann, Cascaded control concept of a robot with two degrees of freedom driven by four artificial pneumatic muscle actuators[C]//American Control Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005. IEEE, 2005:680–685.Google Scholar
Chou, C. P. and Hannaford, B., Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans Robotics & Automation, 12(1), 90102 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tondu, B., A Seven-degrees-of-freedom Robot-arm Driven by Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Humanoid Robots. Int J Robot Res. 24(4), 257274 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschemann, H. and Schindele, D., Comparison of Model-Based Approaches to the Compensation of Hysteresis in the Force Characteristic of Pneumatic Muscles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(7), 36203629 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. M., Kothera, C. S., Sanner, R. M. and N. M. Wereley, Nonlinear Control of Robotic Manipulators Driven by Pneumatic Artificial Muscles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 21(1), 5568 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, K. C., Tang, T., Zhang, C. B. and P. Guo, A comparative study on the Microhyla skeletal system of three species of frogs in China (Amphibian: Microhylidae). Sichuan Zoology, 28(02), 234240 (2009).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fan et al. supplementary material

Fan et al. supplementary material

Download Fan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 39 MB