Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:38:03.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling and optimization of motion for inchworm-inspired magnetically driven soft robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2023

Yue Di
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China
Yuyan Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China Key Lab of Measurement Technology and Instrumentation of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China
Yintang Wen
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China Key Lab of Measurement Technology and Instrumentation of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China
Yaxue Ren
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China
*
Corresponding author: Yuyan Zhang; Email: yyzhang@ysu.edu.cn

Abstract

At present, the research of soft crawling robot pays more attention to the material manufacturing, but neglects the robot modeling. The high degree of freedom of the soft crawling robot makes it more difficult to establish its motion model and analyzes its motion performance. The centimeter-level wireless driven soft crawling robot has great advantages and application scenarios in narrow space exploration. Therefore, this paper proposed a soft robot driven by magnetism to crawling inchworm. By studying the crawling behavior of inchworm and the characteristics of flexible materials driven by magnetism, the structure of the soft robot was designed and the motion model of inchworm was established. The motion model is analyzed and simulated, the structure size of the robot is optimized, and the effectiveness of the model is verified by experiments. The robot’s crawling motion is realized by coupling the structure of the robot’s torso and legs with the flexible magnetic film. Driven by the alternating magnetic field, the maximum motion speed of the robot is 28.24 mm/s. At the same time, the robot can also move in narrow space such as pipes, which can satisfy the centimeter-level space detection and ensure the high efficiency, providing a new idea for narrow space detection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, G., Yang, X., Xu, Y. D., Lu, Y. W. and Hu, H. S., “Neural network-based motion modeling and control of water-actuated soft robotic fish,” Smart Mater. Struct. 32(1), 015004 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Zhao, Z., Wang, Z., Tu, J. and Hu, H., “Swimming modeling and performance optimization of a fish-inspired underwater vehicle (FIUV),” Ocean Eng. 271, 113748 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopaee, M. J., Bal, S., Pretty, C. and Chen, X. Q., “Design and development of a wheel-less snake robot with active stiffness control for adaptive pedal wave locomotion,” J. Bionic Eng. 16(4), 593607 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Peng, W., Wang, Z., Tu, J., Hu, H., Wang, D., Cheng, H. and Zhu, L., “Modeling of swimming posture dynamics for a beaver-like robot,” Ocean Eng. 279, 114550 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, C.-W., Lee, D.-J. and Lee, S.-Y., “Bioinspired segment robot with earthworm-like plane locomotion,” J. Bionic Eng. 13(2), 292302 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, M. W., Kim, M. S. and Ahn, S. H., “Shape memory textile composites with multi-mode actuations for soft morphing skins,” Compos. B Eng. 198, 108170 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, S., Kim, S., Ha, S., Lee, S., Kim, E., Kim, S. Y., Park, S. H., Jeon, J. H., Kim, S. W., Moon, C., Nelson, B. J., Kim, J. Y., Yu, S. W. and Choi, H., “Magnetically actuated microrobots as a platform for stem cell transplantation,” Sci. Robot. 4(30), eaav4317 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palagi, S., Mark, A. G., Reigh, S. Y., Melde, K., Qiu, T., Zeng, H., Parmeggiani, C., Martella, D., Sanchez-Castillo, A., Kapernaum, N., Giesselmann, F., Wiersma, D. S., Lauga, E. and Fischer, P., “Structured light enables biomimetic swimming and versatile locomotion of photoresponsive soft microrobots,” Nat. Mater. 15(6), 647– (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shao, Z. W., Yu, L. T. and Li, J., “A Method for Self-Service Rehabilitation Training of Human Lower Limbs,” In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (IEEE CASE) (2019) pp. 158163.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Bisoyi, H. K., Zheng, Z. G., Gutierrez-Cuevas, K. G., Singh, G., Kumar, S., Bunning, T. J. and Li, Q., “Stimuli-directed self-organized chiral superstructures for adaptive windows enabled by mesogen-functionalized graphene,” Mater. Today 20(5), 230237 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zang, H. B., Zhao, D. F. and Shen, L. G., “Theoretical study of global scale analysis method for agile bionic leg mechanism,” Robotica 38(3), 427441 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijspeert, A. J., “Biorobotics: Using robots to emulate and investigate agile locomotion,” Science 346(6206), 196203 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, K. and Yu, J. C., “Research status of bionic amphibious robots: A review,” Ocean Eng. 227, 108862 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J. Z., Wang, S. Q., Wang, Y., Li, G., Zhao, J. and Liu, G. F., “Research on frog-inspired swimming robot driven by pneumatic muscles,” Robotica 40(5), 15271537 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R. Q., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y. W., Tan, W. J., Chen, W. Y. and Liu, L. Q., “Soft underwater swimming robots based on artificial muscle,” Adv. Mater. Technol. 8(4), 2200962 (2023).Google Scholar
Han, Q. F., Ji, A. H., Jiang, N., Hu, J. and Gorb, S. N., “A climbing robot with paired claws inspired by gecko locomotion,” Robotica 40(10), 36863698 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z. Y., Wang, Y. X., Wang, J. B., Fei, Y. Q. and Du, Q. T., “An obstacle-avoiding and stiffness-tunable modular bionic soft robot,” Robotica 40(8), 26513665 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Deng, J., Zhang, S. and Liu, Y., “Development of a miniature quadrupedal piezoelectric robot combining fast speed and nano-resolution,” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 250, 108276 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rios, S. A., Fleming, A. J. and Yong, Y. K., “Miniature resonant ambulatory robot,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2(1), 337343 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dharmawan, A. G., Hariri, H. H., Soh, G. S., Foong, S. and Wood, K. L., “Design, analysis, and characterization of a two-legged miniature robot with piezoelectric-driven four-bar linkage,” J. Mech. Robot. 10(2), 021003 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernando-Garcia, J., Garcia-Caraballo, J. L., Ruiz-Diez, V. and Sanchez-Rojas, J. L., “Motion of a legged bidirectional miniature piezoelectric robot based on traveling wave generation,” Micromachines 11(3), 321 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hariri, H., Bernard, Y. and Razek, A., “Dual piezoelectric beam robot: The effect of piezoelectric patches’ positions,” J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Struct. 26(18), 25772590 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop-Moser, J. and Kota, S., “Design and modeling of generalized fiber-reinforced pneumatic soft actuators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 31(3), 536545 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rus, D. and Tolley, M. T., “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,” Nature 521(7553), 467475 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, G., Chen, D., Chen, K. and Zhang, Z., “The current research status and development strategy on biomimetic robot,” J. Mech. Eng. 51(13), 2744 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, J. W., Liang, W. Y., Wang, Y. Z., Lee, H. P., Zhu, J. and Ren, Q. Y., “Control of a soft inchworm robot with environment adaptation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 67(5), 38093818 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, H. Q., Feng, R. Y., Xie, Y. W., Jiang, B. W., Sheng, Y. Z., Yu, Y., Baoyin, H. X. and Zeng, X. Y., “Magworm: A biomimetic magnet embedded worm-like soft robot,” Soft Robot. 8(5), 507518 (2021).Google ScholarPubMed
Steiner, J. A., Pham, L. N., Abbott, J. J. and Leang, K. K., “Modeling and analysis of a soft endoluminal inchworm robot propelled by a rotating magnetic dipole field,” J. Mech. Robot. 14(5), 051002 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Li, H. Z., Zhang, Z. Z., Yu, P. F., Yang, L. H., Du, J. L., Niu, Y. and Jiang, J., “Review of bionic crawling micro-robots,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 105(3), 56 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. L., “A review of magnetic composite polymers applied to microfluidic devices,” J Electrochem. Soc. 161(2), B3173B3183 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W., Lum, G. Z., Mastrangeli, M. and Sitti, M., “Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion,” Nature 554(7690), 8185 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ijaz, S., Li, H., Hoang, M. C., Kim, C.-S., Bang, D., Choi, E. and Park, J.-O., “Magnetically actuated miniature walking soft robot based on chained magnetic microparticles-embedded elastomer,” Sens. Actuators A Phys. 301, 111707 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di et al. supplementary material

Di et al. supplementary material 1

Download Di et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 2.6 MB

Di et al. supplementary material

Di et al. supplementary material 2

Download Di et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.9 MB

Di et al. supplementary material

Di et al. supplementary material 3

Download Di et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 5.3 MB