Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Dynamic dexterity of a planar 2-DOF parallel manipulator in a hybrid machine tool

  • Jun Wu (a1), Jinsong Wang (a1), Tiemin Li (a1), Liping Wang (a1) and Liwen Guan (a1)...

Summary

This paper addresses the dynamic dexterity of a planar 2-degree of freedom (DOF) parallel manipulator with virtual constraint. Without simplification, the dynamic formulation is derived by using the virtual work principle. The condition number of the inertia matrix of the dynamic equation is presented as a criterion to evaluate the dynamic dexterity of a manipulator. In order to obtain the best isotropic configuration of the dynamic dexterity in the whole workspace, two global performance indices, which consider the mean value and standard deviation of the condition number of the inertia matrix, respectively, are proposed as the objective function. For a given set of geometrical and inertial parameters, the dynamic dexterity of the parallel manipulator is more isotropic in the center than at the boundaries of the workspace.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail: wu-j03@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.

References

Hide All
1.Dasgupta, B., Mruthyunjaya, T. S., “A Newton–Euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the stewart platform manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 33 (8), 11351152 (1998).
2.Zhang, C. D., Song, S. M., “An efficient method for inverse dynamics of manipulators based on the virtual work principle,” J. Robot. Syst. 10 (5), 605627 (1993).
3.Li, Y., Xu, Q., “Kinematics and inverse dynamics analysis for a general 3-PRS spatial parallel mechanism,” Robotica 23 (2), 219229 (2005).
4.Wang, L.-P., Wang, J.-S. and Chen, J., “The dynamic analysis of a 2-PRR planar parallel mechanism,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 219 (9), 901909 (2005).
5.Wang, L. P., Wang, J. S., Li, Y. W. and Lu, Y., “Kinematic and dynamic equations of a planar parallel manipulator,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 217 (5), 525531 (2003).
6.Wu, J., Wang, J., Li, T. and Wang, L., “Analysis and application of a 2-DOF planar parallel mechanism,” ASME J. Mech. Design 129 (4), 434437 (2007).
7.Tadokoro, S., Kimura, I. and Takamori, T., “A measure for evaluation of dynamic dexterity based on a stochastic interpretation of manipulator motion,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics (1991) pp. 509–514.
8.Yoshikawa, T., “Dynamic manipulability of robot manipulators,” J. Robot. Syst. 2 (1), 113124 (1985).
9.Yoshikawa, T., “Manipulability of robotic mechanisms,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 4 (2), 39 (1985).
10.Park, F. C. and Kim, J. W., “Manipulability of closed kinematic chains,” ASME J. Mech. Design 120 (4), 542548 (1998).
11.Liu, X.-J., Wang, Q.-M. and J. Wang “Kinematics, dynamics and dimensional synthesis of a novel 2-DoF translational manipulator,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 41 (4), 205224 (2005).
12.Chiacchio, P., Bouffard-Vercelli, Y. and Pierrot, F., “Force polytope and force ellipsoid for redundant manipulators,” J. Robot. Syst. 14 (8), 613620 (1997).
13.Chiacchio, P., “New dynamic manipulability ellipsoid for redundant manipulators,” Robotica 18 (4), 381387 (2000).
14.Asada, H., “A geometrical representation of manipulator dynamics and its application to arm design,” J. Dynam. Syst. Meas. Control 105 (3), 131135 (1983).
15.Asada, H. and Youcef-Toumi, K., “Analysis and design of a direct-drive arm with a five-bar-link parallel drive mechanism,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst. Meas. Control 106 (3), 225230 (1984).
16.Li, M., Huang, T., Mei, J. et al. , “Dynamic formulation and performance comparison of the 3-DOF modules of two reconfigurable PKM-the Tricept and the TriVariant,” ASME J. Mech. Design 127 (6), 11291136 (2005).
17.Gosselin, C. M. and Angeles, J., “A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Design 113 (3), 220226 (1991).
18.Liu, X.-J., Jin, Z.-L. and Gao, F., “Optimum design of 3-DOF spherical parallel manipulators with respect to the conditioning and stiffness indices,” Mech. Mach. Theory 35 (9), 12571267 (2000).

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed