Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:09:08.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heritage Studies and Islam: A Crisis of Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Trinidad Rico
Trinidad Rico*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is perhaps not surprising that discussions on the topic of destruction gain the most traction in the work of heritage in public and academic discourses alike, since this is an instrumental part of the epistemology that constructs heritage as a subject of study—what is heritage if not a subject “at risk”? Concordantly, discussions of heritage destruction are a dominant theme in contemporary conversations and concerns for the fate and management of cultural heritage in the Middle East overall (i.e. Exell and Rico 2013), a tendency that is associated with the persistence and visibility of conflict in the region during a time when heritage concerns are significantly shaped by various global “observers.” What is problematic, however, is first the way that the inherently negative mantle of destruction dominates every conversation about the heritage of the Middle East, and how easily academic debates have incorporated institutional and public discourses about destruction, empowering a monolithic debate that would benefit from a more critical—and ethical—analysis. Secondly, what is also alarming is the degree to which destruction is often associated with specific perpetrators in this region, notably, a caricaturized Islam whose main feature is a dislike for preservation that articulates through scandalous acts of iconoclasm across the broad Middle East region (witnessed through highly circulated vignettes of destruction in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Mali, and other countries and regions). Yet, the representation of an Islam that is at odds with global heritage constructs has been extensively challenged academically, considering the varied and changing attitudes to non-Muslim forms of representation through time (Elias 2012), individual variations (Flood 2002), and their relationship to changes in political regimes (Elias 2007; Flood 2002), in such a way that a consistent or universal attitude to this type of representation cannot be supported. But, as I argue in this essay, the specter of the iconoclast unfortunately remains firmly established in popular discourse—and surprisingly, in some disciplinary discourses. But what happens outside of the realm of destruction in the heritage of the Middle East? Further, how can heritage studies support the integration of Islam in the heritage debates for the region in a way that circumvents the current misrepresentation?

Type
Roundtable
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , August 2017 , pp. 183 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Byrne, Denis. 1991. “Western Hegemony in Archaeological Heritage Management.” History and Anthropology 5: 269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cesari, Chiara. 2015. “Post-Colonial Ruins: Archaeologies of political violence and IS.” Anthropology Today 31 (6): 22–26.Google Scholar
Elias, Jamal J. 2007. “(Un)making Idolatry: From Mecca to Bamiyan.” Future Anterior 4 (2): 12–29.Google Scholar
Elias, Jamal J. 2012. Aisha's Cushion: Religious Art, Perception, and Practice in Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exell, Karen, and Rico, Trinidad. 2013. “‘There is No Heritage in Qatar’: Orientalism, Colonialism and Other Problematic Histories,” World Archaeology 45 (5): 670–685.Google Scholar
Flood, Finbarr B. 2002. “Between Cult and Culture: Bamiyan, Islamic Iconoclasm, and the Museum.” The Art Bulletin no. 84 (4): 641–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafstein, Valdimar. 2007. “Claiming Culture: Intangible Heritage Inc., Folklore©, Traditional knowledge™.” In Prädikat “Heritage”: Wertschöpfungen Aus Kulturellen Ressourcen, edited by Hemme, Dorothee, Tauschek, Markus, Bendix, Regina, 81–119. LIT Verlag Münster.Google Scholar
Harmanşah, Ömur. 2015. “ISIS, heritage, and the spectacles of destruction in the global media.” Near Eastern Archaeology 78 (3): 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, Lynn. 2014. “States of Conservation: Protection, Politics, and Pacting within UNESCO's World Heritage Committee.” Anthropological Quarterly 87 (1): 217–44.Google Scholar
Rice, Yael. 2017 (February 12). @Yael_Rice (Twitter). Accessed 10 March 2017, https://twitter.com/Yael_Rice Google Scholar
Rico, Trinidad. 2016. Constructing Destruction: Heritage Narratives in the Tsunami City. UCL Institute of Archaeology Critical Cultural Heritage Series. New York and London: Routledge Google Scholar
Rico, Trinidad. 2015. “Heritage at Risk: The Authority and Autonomy of a Dominant Preservation Framework.” In Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage, edited by Lafrenz-Samuels, Kathryn and Rico, Trinidad, 147–62. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Rico, Trinidad. 2014. “Islamophobia and the Location of Heritage Debates in the Arabian Peninsula.” In Cultural Heritage in the Arabian Peninsula: Debates, Discourses and Practices, edited by Exell, Karen and Rico, Trinidad, 19–32. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rico, Trinidad, and Lababidi, Rim. 2017. “Extremism in Contemporary Heritage Debates about Islam.” Future Anterior 13 (2): tbd.Google Scholar
Smith, Claire, Burke, Heather, de Leiuen, Cherrie, and Jackson, Garry. 2016. “The Islamic State's Symbolic War: Da'esh's Socially Mediated Terrorism as a Threat to Cultural Heritage.” Journal of Social Archaeology 16 (2): 164–88.Google Scholar
Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Worth, Robert F. 2017 (February 9). “Crafting the Koran.” NYR Daily. The New York Review of Books. Accessed 12 February 2017, http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/02/09/crafting-the-koran/ Google Scholar