Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:35:22.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The international relations of the ‘imagined community’: Explaining the late nineteenth-century genesis of the Chinese nation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2014

LUKE COOPER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Benedict Anderson's Imagined Communities has long been established as one of the major contributions to theories of nations and nationalism. Anderson located the rise of national identities within a long-evolving crisis of dynastic conceptions of identity, time, and space, and argued print-capitalism was the key cultural and economic force in the genesis of nations. This article offers a critical appropriation and application of Anderson's theory through two steps. Firstly, it evaluates the conceptual underpinning of his approach through an engagement with recent scholarship on the ‘theory of uneven and combined development’. The fruits of this interchange provide a deeper analytical framework to account for what Anderson calls the ‘modularity’ of national identity, that is, its universal spread across the globe. Modularity is now reconceptualised as a product of combined development with its causal efficacy derived from the latent dynamics of a geopolitically fragmented world. The latter gave shape and form to the new national communities. Secondly, this revised framework is applied to the emergence of Chinese national identity in the late nineteenth century. This allows Chinese nationalism to be recast as an ideological amalgam of indigenous and imported elements that emerged out of the crisis-ridden encounter between Imperial China and Western imperialism in the nineteenth century.

Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 477 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ray Rudowski, As It Happened Hong Kong's Handover June 30th 1997 Ray Rudowski's Historical Archive Part 13 (video), (2012), available at: {http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oms8sNLyP9g&feature=youtube_gdata_player} accessed 23 September 2013.

2 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 2006), p. 5 Google Scholar.

3 Pomerantz-Zhang, Linda, Wu Tingfang (1842–1922) (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1992), p. 8 Google Scholar.

4 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 4, emphasis added.

5 Hobson, John M., The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hobson, John M., ‘What's at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development', Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 40:1 (2011), pp. 147–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Anderson, Imagined Communities.

7 Bartelson, Jens, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Griffiths, Martin and Sullivan, Michael, ‘Nationalism and International Relations Theory’, Australian Journal of Politics & History, 43:1 (1997), pp. 53–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pettman, Jan Jindy, ‘Nationalism and After’, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), pp. 149–51, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Pettman, ‘Nationalism and After’, p. 151.

10 For an overview, see Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 4:1 (2001), pp. 391–416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Hobsbawm, E. J., Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 4 Google Scholar.

12 White, Hayden, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1975), p. 170 Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., p. 173.

14 Ibid., pp. 174–5.

15 Eley, Geoff and Suny, Ronald Grigor, Becoming National: A Reader (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 21 Google Scholar.

16 Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 1 Google Scholar.

17 Hage, Ghassan, ‘A Not so Multi-Sited Ethnography of a Not so Imagined Community’, Anthropological Theory, 5:4 (2005), pp. 463–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

18 Desai, Radhika, ‘Introduction: Nationalisms and Their Understandings in Historical Perspective’, Third World Quarterly, 29:3 (2008), p. 398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Desai, Radhika, ‘Review Essay: The Inadvertence of Benedict Anderson: A Review Essay of Imagined Communities on the Occasion of a New Edition’, Global Media and Communication, 4:2 (August 2008), p. 193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Nairn, Tom, The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism (Champaign, IL: Common Ground, 2003)Google Scholar.

21 Desai, ‘Review Essay: The Inadvertence of Benedict Anderson: A Review Essay of Imagined Communities on the Occasion of a New Edition’, p. 193.

22 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 37.

23 Ibid.

24 Desai, Radhika, ‘Marx, List, and the Materiality of Nations’, Rethinking Marxism, 24:1 (2012), pp. 47–67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 For a summary of these issues see Callinicos, Alex, ‘Does Capitalism Need the State System?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20:4 (2007), pp. 533–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Whose Imagined Community?’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 20:3 (1991), p. 521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 2006), p. 156 Google Scholar.

28 Anievas, Alexander and Nisancioglu, Kerem, ‘What's at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the “Rise of the West”’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 42:1 (2013), pp. 78–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Davidson, Neil, ‘Putting the Nation Back into “the International”’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:1 (2009), pp. 9–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Matin, Kamran, ‘Uneven and Combined Development in World History: The International Relations of State-Formation in Premodern Iran’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:3 (2007), pp. 419–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Matin, Kamran, ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:2 (2013), pp. 353–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nisancioglu, Kerem, ‘The Ottoman Origins of Capitalism: Uneven and Combined Development and Eurocentrism’, Review of International Studies, 40:2 (2014), pp. 325–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, Justin, ‘Why Is There No International Historical Sociology?’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3 (2006), pp. 307–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, Justin, ‘Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II: Unevenness and Political Multiplicity’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23:1 (2010), pp. 165–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, Justin, ‘The “Philosophical Premises” of Uneven and Combined Development’, Review of International Studies, 39:3 (2013), pp. 569–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Anderson, Imagined Communities, pp. 5–6.

30 Anderson's use of ‘imagined community’ as a presupposition has obvious methodological parallels with the rearticulated vision of ‘combined social development’; both use a general abstraction as a way of structuring a concrete, historical investigation. On the case for a transhistorical notion of combined development, see Rosenberg, ‘Why Is There No International Historical Sociology?’; Rosenberg, ‘Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II’.

31 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 4.

32 Ibid., pp. 42–3.

33 Ibid., pp. 22–5.

34 Ibid., p. 24, see also; Auerbach, Erich, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1968), p. 263 Google Scholar; Bloch, Marc, Feudal Society: Vol 1: The Growth and Ties of Dependence (Psychology Press, 1989), pp. 84–6Google Scholar.

35 Auerbach, Mimesis, p. 74.

36 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 23.

37 Neil Davidson, ‘Reimagined Communities’, International Socialism Journal (online), 117 (2007), available at: {http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=401} accessed 11 November 2013.

38 Benjamin, Illuminations, pp. 261–2.

39 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 26.

40 Ibid., p. 36.

41 Ibid., pp. 38–9.

42 Ibid., pp. 25–6.

43 Ibid., p. 33.

44 Ibid., p. 64.

45 Ibid., p. 40.

46 Ibid., pp. 40–1.

47 Ibid., pp. 44–5.

48 Ibid., p. 4, emphasis added.

49 Nairn, The Break-Up of Britain.

50 Anderson, Imagined Communities, pp. 155–6.

51 Nairn, The Break-Up of Britain, p. 7.

52 Ibid., pp. 334–5.

53 Ibid., p. 335.

54 Ibid., p. 357.

55 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 156.

56 Nairn, The Break-Up of Britain, p. 7.

57 Thanks to Justin Rosenberg for impressing upon me the importance of these distinctions in conversation. A fuller taxonomy of the idea of ‘uneven and combined development’ can be found in Luke Cooper, ‘Uneven and Combined Development in Modern World History: Chinese Economic Reform in the Longue Durée of Capitalist Modernity’, presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, San Diego (2012), p. 6.

58 Trotsky, Leon, The History of the Russian Revolution (volume 1) (London: Sphere Books, 1967), p. 23 Google Scholar.

59 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 4, emphasis added.

60 Ibid., p. 43.

61 Nairn, The Break-Up of Britain, p. 7.

62 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 36.

63 Myers, Ramon and Wang, Yeh-chien, ‘Economic Developments, 1644–1800’, in Peterson, Willard (ed.), Cambridge History of China Volume 9 Part One: The Ch'ing Empire to 1800, vol. 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 606 Google Scholar.

64 Fairbank, John King and Goldman, Merle, China: A New History, Second Enlarged Edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), pp. 21, 83–5, 181Google Scholar.

65 Dirlik, Arif, ‘Culture in Contemporary IR; the Chinese Provocation’, in Shilliam, Robbie (ed.), International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity (Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011), p. 146 Google Scholar.

66 Ibid.

67 Ibid., p. 146

68 Dirlik, ‘Culture in Contemporary IR; the Chinese Provocation’, p. 147.

69 Ibid.

70 Hsü, Immanuel C. Y., The Rise of Modern China (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 192 Google Scholar.

71 Hung, Ho-Fung, Protest with Chinese Characteristics: Demonstrations, Riots, and Petitions in the Mid-Qing Dynasty (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), p. 186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Davidson, ‘Reimagined Communities’.

73 Ibid.

74 Rowe, William, ‘Social Stability and Social Change’, in Peterson, Willard (ed.), Cambridge History of China Volume 9 Part One: The Ch'ing Empire to 1800, vol. 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 473–562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Ibid., p. 552.

76 McMichael, Philip, ‘Britain's Hegemony in the Nineteenth Century World Economy’, in Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Stephens, Evelyne Huber (eds), States versus Markets in the World-System (London: Sage Publications, 1985), pp. 117–49Google Scholar.

77 Hobson, ‘What's at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate?’

78 Kayaoğlu, Turan, Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Many thanks to Maïa Pal for impressing upon me in discussion the significance of the divergent response of the Ottoman and Confucian elites to the formal legal structures of ‘extraterritoriality’.

80 Fairbank and Goldman, China, pp. 216–18.

81 Tanner, Harold Miles, China: A History (Cambridge: MA, Hackett Publishing, 2009), p. 397 Google Scholar.

82 Fairbank and Goldman, China, p. 219.

83 Ibid.

84 Rosenberg, Justin, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations (London: Verso, 1994), p. 128 Google Scholar; Wood, Ellen Meiksins, ‘The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism’, New Left Review, 127 (June 1981)Google Scholar.

85 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 85.

86 Isett, Christopher, State, Peasant, and Merchant in Qing Manchuria, 1644–1862 (Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

87 Hsü, Immanuel C. Y., ‘Late Ch'ing Foreign Relations, 1866–1905’, in Fairbank, John and Liu, Kwang-Ching (eds), Cambridge History of China Vol. 11 Part 2 Late Ch'ing, 1800–1911 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), pp. 108–9Google Scholar.

88 Wood, Neal, John Locke and Agrarian Capitalism (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1984), p. 19 Google Scholar.

89 Chang, Hao, ‘Intellectual Change and the Reform Movement, 1890–8’, in Fairbank, John and Kwang-Ching, (eds), Late Ch'ing, 1800–1911 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 275 Google Scholar.

90 Fairbank and Goldman, China, p. 226.

91 Ibid.

92 Anderson, Imagined Communities, p. 84.

93 Kaske, Elisabeth, The Politics of Language in Chinese Education, 1895–1919 (Pub Place?:, 2008), p. 27 Google Scholar.

94 Chang, ‘Intellectual Change and the Reform Movement, 1890–8’, p. 276.

95 Ibid.

96 Kaske, The Politics of Language in Chinese Education, 1895–1919, p. 94.

97 Ibid.

98 Chatterjee, ‘Whose Imagined Community?’, pp. 522–3.

99 Karl, Rebecca E., Staging the World: Chinese Nationalism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002), p. 11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Chatterjee, ‘Whose Imagined Community?’, p. 523.

101 Alexander Anievas, ‘1914 In World Historical Perspective: The “Uneven” and “Combined” Origins of the First World War’, European Journal of International Relations (2012), p. 16.

102 Lee, Leo, ‘Literary Trends I: The Quest for Modernity, 1895–1927’, in Fairbank, John (ed.), Republican China 1912–1949 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 452–3Google Scholar; see also, Kaske, The Politics of Language in Chinese Education, 1895–1919, pp. 161–232.

103 Tanner, China, pp. 398– 9.

104 Fairbank and Goldman, China, p. 230.

105 Esherick, Joseph, The Origins of the Boxer Uprising (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

106 Fairbank and Goldman, China, pp. 230–1.

107 Westad, Odd Arne, Restless Empire: China and the World since 1750 (London: Bodley Head, 2012), p. 126 Google Scholar.

108 Lee, ‘Literary Trends I’, p. 336.

109 Schiffrin Z., Harold, ‘The Impact of the War on China’, in Kowner, Rotem (ed.), The Impact of the Russo-Japanese War, Kindle Edition (London: Routledge, 2009), p. 171 Google Scholar.

110 Sheftall, M. G., ‘An Ideological Genealogy of Imperial Era Japanese Militarism’, in McDonough, Frank (ed.), The Origins of the Second World War: An International Perspective (London and New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation, 2011), p. 56 Google Scholar.

111 Mitter, Rana, A Bitter Revolution: China's Struggle with the Modern World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

112 Lin, Yusheng, The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era (Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

113 Wakeman, Frederic, ‘A Revisionist View of the Nanjing Decade: Confucian Fascism’, The China Quarterly, 150 (1997), pp. 430–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

114 Hung, Protest with Chinese Characteristics, epilogue.

115 Trotsky, The History of the Russian Revolution (volume 1), pp. 21–32.

116 Kuo, Huei-ying, ‘Chinese Bourgeois Nationalism in Hong Kong and Singapore in the 1930s’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36:3 (2006), pp. 386– 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

117 Zarrow, Peter, After Empire: The Conceptual Transformation of the Chinese State, 1885–1924 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012), p. 208 Google Scholar.

118 Harrell, Paula, Sowing the Seeds of Change: Chinese Students, Japanese Teachers, 18951905 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992), p. 135 Google Scholar.

119 Jansen, Marius B., The Japanese and Sun Yat-Sen (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1970), p. 60 Google Scholar.

120 Ibid., pp. 61–2.

121 Ibid., p. 204.

122 Ching-Hwang, Yen, ‘Overseas Chinese Nationalism in Singapore and Malaya 1877–1912’, Modern Asian Studies, 16:3 (1982), p. 425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

123 Jansen, The Japanese and Sun Yat-Sen, pp. 210–12.

124 Powers, John, History As Propaganda?: Tibetan Exiles versus the People's Republic of China: Tibetan Exiles versus the People's Republic of China (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

125 Mitter, Rana, ‘“The Individual and the International I”: Zou Taofen and Changing Views of China's Place in the International System’, Global Society, 17:2 (2003), p. 123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126 Some writers have challenged the idea that minzu has a racial inflection. Shanshan Lan argues that min is best translated as ‘people’ and zu as ‘lineage’, neither of which are necessarily racialised, and together minzu can mean nation, people or ethnicity. Ergo Lan argues translations of Sun's work have tended to translate minzu as race incorrectly. Lan, however, accepts Sun's nationalism ‘contained a large dose of racial pride’, and that he often conflated minzu with zhongzu (racial lineage) in his own speeches. See Lan, Shanshan, Diaspora and Class Consciousness: Chinese Immigrant Workers in Multiracial Chicago (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 38–9Google Scholar.

127 Cited in Harrell, Sowing the Seeds of Change, p. 104.

128 Cited in Ibid., p. 148.

129 Dikötter, Frank, The Discourse of Race in Modern China (London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, 1992)Google ScholarPubMed.

130 Ibid., pp. 98–107.

131 Ibid., pp. 106–7.

132 Lin, The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness, p. 55.

133 Zarrow, After Empire, p. 187.

134 Ibid., p. 278.

135 Ibid., pp. 92–5.

136 Ibid., p. 157.

137 Ibid., pp. 226–8.

138 Thornton, Patricia M., Disciplining the State: Virtue, Violence, and State-Making in Modern China (Harvard University Asia Center, 2007), p. 72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 Zarrow, After Empire, p. 278.

140 Ibid.

141 Thornton, Disciplining the State, pp. 11–12.

142 Sheftall, ‘An Ideological Genealogy of Imperial Era Japanese Militarism’, p. 56.

143 Zarrow, After Empire, p. 278.

144 Jansen, The Japanese and Sun Yat-Sen, pp. 64, 203.