Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evolving conceptions of justice in international law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Abstract

The article examines the argument that international law is already beginning to reflect cosmopolitanism. It does so by briefly reviewing the history of the ways in which concepts of justice have been represented in international law and then considering the case that cosmopolitanism is present in various forms in contemporary international law. While dismissing some of the stronger cosmopolitan claims it argues that the fuller picture has complexities that International Relations Realists and legal Positivists tend to ignore.


Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1 Suarez, Francisco, Selections from Three Works, ed, Scott, J. B. (2 vols), Classics of International Law (Oxford, 1944), ii, p. 351Google Scholar .

2 Dyson, R. W., Natural Law and Political Realism in the History of Political Thought, vol. 2 (New York: Peter Lang, 2007), p. xGoogle Scholar . See also Pogge, T., ‘Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 9Google Scholar . Caney's, SimonJustice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar offers a comprehensive recent discussion of cosmopolitanism, including the various shades of meaning that the term has acquired over time.

3 Bederman, David J., International Law in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar argues that the ancient Near East (1400–1150 BC), the Greek city states (500–338 BC) and the larger Mediterranean before Roman dominance all constituted true state systems.

4 Bederman, David J., ‘Religion and the sources of international law in antiquity’, in Janis, Mark W. (ed.), The Influence of Religion on the Development of International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff 1991), p. 194Google Scholar .

5 Versteg, Russ, Law in the Ancient World (Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2002), pp. 1718Google Scholar .

6 Cited in Greengus, S., ‘Legal and social institutions of Ancient Mesopotamia’, in Sasson, Jack M. (ed.), Civilizations of the Ancient Near East (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1995), vol. 1, p. 470Google Scholar .

7 For a discussion of the ‘insider-outsider’ relationship in International Relations, see Brown, Chris, Sovereignty, Rights and Justice (Cambridge: Polity, 2002), pp. 1922Google Scholar .

8 David J. Bederman, ‘Religion and the sources of international law’, p. 94.

9 Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Hélène, International Law and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 3841CrossRefGoogle Scholar . See also Garlan, Yvon, War in the Ancient World, translated from the French by Lloyd, Janet (London: Chatto and Windus, 1975), pp. 4173Google Scholar .

10 Plato, , The Republic (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1941), pp. 168171Google Scholar .

11 Maridakis, Georges S., ‘An ancient precedent to Nuremburg’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), pp. 847852CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

12 Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Hélène, International Law, pp. 4450Google Scholar .

13 Nussbaum, Arthur, A Concise History of the Law of Nations, rev. ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1962), p. 196Google Scholar .

14 Vattel, Emerich de, The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, ed. Chitty, J. (London, 1834), p. xiiiGoogle Scholar .

15 Ibid., p. xiv.

16 Ibid., p. 141.

17 Ibid., pp. 195–6.

18 Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Legal Cosmopolitanism: Tom Franck's Messianic World’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 35 (2003), p. 475Google Scholar . See also his The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar , passim.

19 Armstrong, David, The Rise of the International Organisation (London: Macmillan, 1982), pp. 148Google Scholar .

20 Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha, Rules for the World. International Organization in World Politics (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2004), pp. 7886Google Scholar .

21 Cited in Jørgenson, Nina H. B., The Responsibility of States for International Crimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

22 Jørgenson, Nina H. B., The Responsibility, pp. 9399Google Scholar .

23 Okawa, Phoebe, ‘Issues of admissibility and the law on international responsibility’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.) International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 497Google Scholar .

24 Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The effect of jus cogens norms: whoever opened Pandora's box, did you ever think about the consequences?’, The European Journal of International Law, 18 (2007), pp. 853871CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

25 Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Human rights and the magic of jus cogens, The European Journal of International Law, 19 (2008), pp. 491508CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

26 The strongest advocate of neo-Kantian ideas is Tesón, Fernando R. See his ‘The Kantian theory of international law’, Columbia Law Review, 53 (1992), pp. 53102CrossRefGoogle Scholar and A Philosophy of International Law (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1998)Google Scholar . This is also a theme in some of Habermas's work, for example ‘Kant's idea of perpetual peace with the benefit of two hundred years hindsight’, in Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmoplitan Ideal (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997)Google Scholar . For critiques of Tesón, see Lynch, Cecilia, ‘Kant, the republican peace and moral guidance in international law’, Ethics and International Affairs, 8 (1984), pp. 3958CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Capps, Patrick, ‘The Kantian project in international legal theory’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), pp. 10031025Google Scholar .

27 The International Commission on Intervention and Sovereignty, State, The Responsibility to Protect. Research, bibliography, background: Supplementary volume (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001), pp. 513Google Scholar .

28 Annan, Kofi, ‘Two concepts of sovereignty’, The Economist, 352 (18 September 1999), pp. 4950Google Scholar . See also Peters, Anne, ‘Humanity as the A and Ω of sovereignty’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), pp. 513544CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

29 For a discussion of the legal issues involved in this and related cases that employ the erga omnes and jus cogens concepts, see Weller, Marc, ‘On the hazards of foreign travel for dictators and other international criminals’, International Affairs, 75 (1999), pp. 599617CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 For a discussion of some of the legal complexities involved in such cases (not all of which concerned human rights issues) see Nolkaemper, André, ‘Internationally wrongful acts in domestic courts’, American Journal of International Law, 101 (2007), pp. 760799Google Scholar .

31 ‘South-West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa)’, Second Phase (18 July 1966), ICJ Reports 1966, 4, International Law Reports.

32 ICJ Reports, 1971, para. 54, International Law Reports. See also Danilenko, Gennady M., ‘International jus cogens: issues of law-making’, European Journal of International Law, 2 (1991), pp. 4265CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

33 Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Hélène, ‘International law, national norms, and American nuclear use’, Review of International Studies, 27 (2001), pp. 309326CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

34 Simma, Bruno and Paulus, Andreas L., ‘The “international community”: facing the challenge of globalization’, European Journal of International Law, 9 (1998), p. 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

35 Donnelly, J., International Human Rights (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993), p. 62Google Scholar .

36 Forsythe, D. P., The Internationalization of Human Rights (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1991), pp. 5586Google Scholar .

37 Ramsbotham, Oliver and Woodhouse, Tom, Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict (Cambridge: Polity, 1996)Google Scholar .

38 Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination. Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 191230Google Scholar .

39 Larschan, Bradley, ‘The international legal status of the contractual rights of contractors under the Deep Sea-Bed Mining Provisions (Part XI) of the Third UN Convention on the Law of the Sea’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 14 (1986), pp. 218221Google Scholar .

40 Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), pp. 351379Google Scholar .

41 Halpern, Shanna L., ‘The UN Conference on Environment and Development: Process and Documentation’, The Academic Council on the UN System and Papers (1993), no. 2Google Scholar .

42 Armstrong, David, ‘Law, justice and the idea of a world society’, International Affairs, 75 (1999), pp. 547561CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

43 Mennecke, M. and Tams, C., ‘The LaGrand Case’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51 (2002), pp. 449455Google Scholar . One point made by this article is that the case ‘confirms the view that under modern international law, individual rights need not necessarily derive from classical human rights treaties, but are a pervasive phenomenon affecting nearly all areas of international law’. (p. 454).

44 The Summary of the 2006 Judgement is available at: {http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/126/10437.pdf}.

46 Weller, Marc, ‘The struggle for an international constitutional order’, in Armstrong, David, Routledge Handbook of International Law (London and New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. 179194Google Scholar .

47 For a sophisticated discussion of global civil society in the context of English School understandings of world society, see Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), esp. pp. 7787CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

48 Nor are China, India or any Middle Eastern state apart from Jordan.

49 Jouannet, Emmanuelle, ‘Universalism and imperialism: the true-false paradox of international law?’, The European Journal of International Relations, 18 (2007), pp. 379407Google Scholar .

50 For a discussion of this debate, see Brown, M. Anne, Human Rights and the Borders of Suffering. The Promotion of Human Rights in International Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), pp. 5588CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

51 Posner, Eric A., The Perils of Global Legalism (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2009), p. 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar . See also Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A, The Limits of International Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 205226Google Scholar .

52 Thucydides, , The Peloponnesian War, trans. Warner, Rex (London: Penguin Classics, 1954), p. 361Google Scholar .

53 For an argument that we already have a new world order, but one comprising such informal processes taking place within a complex global web of governmental, legal, and other networks, see Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar .

54 Reus-Smit, Chris, ‘The politics of international law’, in Reus-Smit, Chris (ed.), The Politics of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

55 The first two books in his projected trilogy are Legitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar ; and International Legitimacy and World Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar .

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 152 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 4th December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-zcwv2 Total loading time: 0.632 Render date: 2020-12-04T08:52:26.042Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Fri Dec 04 2020 07:59:21 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Evolving conceptions of justice in international law
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Evolving conceptions of justice in international law
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Evolving conceptions of justice in international law
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *