Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:31:31.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the barriers and exploring the possibilities of the organic livestock sector in dehesa agroforestry systems: a multi-actor approach for effective diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Andrés Horrillo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Research Institute of Agricultural Resources (INURA), University of Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suarez,s/n 06007Badajoz, Spain
Paula Gaspar*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Research Institute of Agricultural Resources (INURA), University of Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suarez,s/n 06007Badajoz, Spain
Francisco J. Mesías
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Research Institute of Agricultural Resources (INURA), University of Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suarez,s/n 06007Badajoz, Spain
Ahmed Elghannam
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Damanhour University, Egypt Research Institute of Agricultural Resources (INURA), University of Extremadura, Spain
Miguel Escribano
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Research Institute of Agricultural Resources (INURA), University of Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suarez,s/n 06007Badajoz, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Paula Gaspar, E-mail: pgaspar@unex.es

Abstract

The dehesa agroforestry system is classified as one of the most singular ecosystems in the European Union. In the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula, it spreads over an area of approximately 6.7 million hectares, contributing major environmental, cultural, aesthetic and economic value to the region. The main agricultural activity that is developed in this ecosystem is the extensive farming of cattle, sheep and Iberian pigs with low stocking density and few inputs. Sustainable management of these ecosystems' existing production farms is essential in order to secure their continuity, as they face a difficult situation on account of their low profitability. One of the strategies that could be employed to attain a sustainable situation is the proposition of an organic production model. In order to explore this option, a participatory research process has been proposed and developed in the Spanish region called Extremadura (Spain). The aim of this process is to investigate the potential of extensive farming systems in moving toward a sustainable organic production model, identifying the main barriers preventing livestock farmers from converting to the organic model and seeking specific improvement measures that would reduce such barriers. For that purpose, four focus group sessions were run with a total of 33 participating stakeholders. For the analysis of these focus groups, Atlas.ti qualitative software was used to categorize and quantify the main ideas proposed during the sessions. The findings revealed that the main barriers can be classified into three groups: barriers that are inherent to the production processes and the structure of the specific sector, barriers associated with administration and management issues and lastly, barriers relating to education and training of the various actors involved. We consider this paper may contribute to policy makers' decisions to focus on specific actions for improvement that are customized for the socio-economic and environmental conditions of the region.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcon, P, Dominguez-Salas, P, Häsler, B, Rushton, J, Alarcon, P, Fèvre, EM, Murungi, MK, Muinde, P, Akoko, J, Dominguez-Salas, P, Kiambi, S, Alarcon, P, Dominguez-Salas, P, Häsler, B, Rushton, J, Fèvre, EM, Kiambi, S and Ahmed, S (2017) Mapping of beef, sheep and goat food systems in Nairobi—a framework for policy making and the identification of structural vulnerabilities and deficiencies. Agricultural Systems 152, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antmann, G, Ares, G, Salvador, A, Varela, P and Fiszman, SM (2011) Exploring and explaining creaminess perception: consumers’ underlying concepts. Journal of Sensory Studies 26, 4047. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00319.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ates, HC, Yilmaz, H, Demircan, V, Gul, M, Ozturk, E and Kart, MÇO (2017) How did post-2000 agricultural policy changes in Turkey affect farmers?—A focus group evaluation. Land Use Policy 69, 298306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, M and Veysset, P (2003) Conversion of cattle and sheep suckler farming to organic farming: adaptation of the farming system and its economic consequences. Livestock Production Science 80, 141152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00315-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Penedo, I, López-Alonso, M, Shore, RF, Miranda, M, Castillo, C, Hernández, J and Benedito, JL (2012) Evaluation of organic, conventional and intensive beef farm systems: health, management and animal production. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 6, 15031511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollani, L, Bonadonna, A and Peira, G (2019) The millennials’ concept of sustainability in the food sector. Sustainability 11, 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102984.Google Scholar
Calatrava Requena, J and del González Roa, MC (2012) Los canales cortos como forma alternativa de comercialización, Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraia y Pesquera (IFAPA).Google Scholar
CAYMA (2003) Mapa de vegetación y recursos forestales. Plan Forestal de Extremadura. Merida: Consejería de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Extremadura.Google Scholar
Chalofsky, N (1999) How to Conduct Focus Groups. Alexandria: American Society for Training & Development.Google Scholar
Colom Gorgues, A and Colom Espada, C (2010) Evolución del Clúster español y europeo de la producción ecológica dentro de un sistema agroalimentario cambiante y más exigente. IX Congr. la Soc. Española Agric. Ecológica. pp. 117.Google Scholar
Cuéllar-Padilla, M and Calle-Collado, Á (2011) Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia. Journal of Rural Studies 27, 372383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.08.004.Google Scholar
Dantsis, T, Loumou, A and Giourga, C (2009) Organic agriculture's approach towards sustainability; Its relationship with the agro-industrial complex, a case study in Central Macedonia, Greece. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22, 197216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9139-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, VM, Minim, VPR, Ferreira, MAM, de Souza, PHP, da Moraes, LES and Minim, LAÔ (2014) Study of the perception of consumers in relation to different ice cream concepts. Food Quality and Preference 36, 161168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Herder, M, Moreno, G, Mosquera-Losada, RM, Palma, JHN, Sidiropoulou, A, Santiago Freijanes, JJ, Crous-Duran, J, Paulo, JA, Tomé, M, Pantera, A, Papanastasis, VP, Mantzanas, K, Pachana, P, Papadopoulos, A, Plieninger, T and Burgess, PJ (2017) Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 241, 121132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dundar, S (2013) Students’ participation to the decision-making process as a tool for democratic school. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 13, 867875.Google Scholar
EcoLogical (2018) El sector ecológico en España 2018. EcoLogical.bio. Valencia, España, 30 pp. Available at http://www.ecological.bio/es/sectorbio2018.Google Scholar
EIP-AGRI Service Point (2014) EIP-AGRI Operational groups. Turning your idea into innovation. Operational Groups: building blocks for the EIP-AGRI. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/content/eip-agri-brochure-operational-groups-turning-your-idea-innovation.Google Scholar
Eldesouky, A, Pulido, AF and Mesias, FJ (2015) The role of packaging and presentation format in consumers’ preferences for food: an application of projective techniques. Journal of Sensory Studies 30, 360369. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldesouky, A, Mesias, FJ, Elghannam, A and Escribano, M (2018) Can extensification compensate livestock greenhouse gas emissions? A study of the carbon footprint in Spanish agroforestry systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 200, 2838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghannam, A, Escribano, M and Mesias, F (2017) Can social networks contribute to the development of short supply chains in the Spanish agri-food sector? New Medit 16, 3642.Google Scholar
Escribano, M, Díaz-caro, C and Mesias, FJ (2018) Science of the total environment A participative approach to develop sustainability indicators for dehesa agroforestry farms. Science of the Total Environment 640–641, 8997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espejo, M and Espejo, AM (2006) Los sistemas tradicionales de Explotación y la aplicación de innovaciones tecnológicas de la dehesa. In Espejo, M, Martín, M, Matos, C and Mesías, FJ (eds.). Gestión Ambiental y Económica Del Ecosistema Dehesa En La Pen Ínsula Ibérica. Mérida: Junta de Extremadura, Consejería de Infraestructuras y Desarrollo Tecnológico, pp. 177200.Google Scholar
Flick, U (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 4th Edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Galvez, FCF and Resurreccion, AVA (1992) Reliability of the focus group technique in determining the quality characteristics of mungbean. Journal of Sensory Studies 7, 315326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1992.tb00197.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, P, Mesías, FJ, Escribano, M, Rodriguez De Ledesma, A and Pulido, F (2007) Economic and management characterization of dehesa farms: implications for their sustainability. Agroforestry Systems 71, 151162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9081-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, P, Escribano, M, Mesías, FJ, de Ledesma, AR and Pulido, F (2008) Sheep farms in the Spanish rangelands (dehesas): typologies according to livestock management and economic indicators. Small Ruminant Research: The Journal of the International Goat Association 74, 5263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, P, Escribano, M and Mesias, FJ (2016) A qualitative approach to study social perceptions and public policies in dehesa agroforestry systems. Land Use Policy 58, 427436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J and Nehring, R (2013) Comparing economic performance of organic and conventional U.S. beef farms using matching samples. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 57, 178192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00610.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granda, M, Moreno, V and Prieto, PM (1991) Pastos naturales en la dehesa extremeña. Badajoz: Junta de Extremadura.Google Scholar
Hernández, CG (1998) Ecología y fisiología de la dehesa. In La dehesa, . Aprovechamiento sostenible de los recursos naturales. Madrid: Editorial Agrícola, pp. 5394.Google Scholar
Horrillo, A, Escribano, M, Mesias, FJ, Elghannam, A and Gaspar, P (2016) Is there a future for organic production in high ecological value ecosystems? Agricultural Systems 143, 114125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrabalova, A and Zander, K (2006) Organic beef farming in the Czech Republic: structure, development and economic performance. Agricultural Economics – Czech 52, 89100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IFOAM (2016) Organic in Europe—Prospects and Developments 2016. Brussels: IFOAM EU Group. https://doi.org/978-3-03736-261-7.Google Scholar
Kaler, J and Green, LE (2013) Sheep farmer opinions on the current and future role of veterinarians in flock health management on sheep farms: a qualitative study. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 112, 370377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinnear, TC and Taylor, JR (1993) Investigación de mercados: un enfoque aplicado. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Krefting, L (1991) Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45, 214222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, RA and Casey, MA (2009) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 4th Edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Lee, H-J and Yun, Z-S (2015) Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference 39, 259267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Sánchez, A, Perea, R, Dirzo, R and Roig, S (2016) Livestock vs. wild ungulate management in the conservation of Mediterranean dehesas: implications for oak regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management 362, 99106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, NK and Birks, DF (2006) Marketing Research. An Applied Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
MAPAMA (2012) Caracterización del mercado de especialistas de venta: Valor, volumen, viabilidad y buenas prácticas de comercialización. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Secretaria Gereral Técnica. Madrid.Google Scholar
MAPAMA (2016 a) Agricultura Ecológica Estadística 2016. Centro de Publicaciones. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Secretaria Gereral Técnica. Madrid.Google Scholar
MAPAMA (2016 b) Producción ecológica Española en términos de valor y mercado, referida al año 2015. Centro de Publicaciones. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Secretaria Gereral Técnica. Madrid.Google Scholar
McCabe, DB and Nowlis, SM (2003) The effect of examining actual products or product descriptions on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, 431439. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesías, FJ, Escribano, M, Gaspar, P and Pulido, F (2008) Actitudes de los consumidores extremeños hacia las carnes ecológicas, con IGP y convencionales. Archivos de Zootecnia 57, 139146.Google Scholar
Mesías, FJ, Mart́nez-Carrasco, F, Martínez-Paz, JM and Gaspar, P (2011) Willingness to pay for organic food in Spain: an approach to the analysis of regional differences | La dispositión a pagar por alimentos ecológicos en España: Una aproximación a la existencia de diferencias regionales. ITEA Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria 107, 320.Google Scholar
Oviedo, JL, Ovando, P, Forero, L, Huntsinger, L, Álvarez, A, Mesa, B and Campos, P (2013) The private economy of dehesas and ranches: case studies. In Campos, P, Huntsinger, L, Oviedo Pro, JL, Starrs, PF, Diaz, M, Standiford, R and Montero, G (eds), Mediterranean Oak Woodland Working Landscapes: Dehesas of Spain and Ranchlands of California. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 389424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6707-2_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, MC and Del Pozo, J (2001) La superficie forestal de Extremadura. In La Agricultura y Ganadería Extremeñas 2000. Badajoz: Caja de Ahorros de Badajoz, pp. 205230.Google Scholar
Ponisio, LC, M'Gonigle, LK, Mace, KC, Palomino, J, De Valpine, P and Kremen, C (2015) Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Procceedings of the Royal Society B 282, 20141396. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahm, H, Sanders, J, Nieberg, H, Behrens, G, Kuhnert, H, Strohm, R and Hamm, U (2013) Reversion from organic to conventional agriculture: a review. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28, 263275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Miguel, A (1994) La dehesa española: origen, tipología, características y gestión. Fundación Conde Valle de Salazar, Madrid, 96 pp. p. 96.Google Scholar
SITRAN (2016) Informe Sitran. Sistema Integral de Trazabilidad Animal. Subdirección General de Sanidad e Higiene Animal y Trazabilidad. Dirección General de Sanidad de la Producción Agraria. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Gobierno de España.Google Scholar
Stewart, DW and Shamdasani, PN (1991) Focus Groups. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287.n2.Google Scholar
Stewart, B, Olson, D, Goody, C, Tinsley, A, Amos, R, Betts, N, Georgiou, C, Hoerr, S, Ivaturi, R and Voichick, J (1994) Converting focus group data on food choices into a quantitative instrument. Journal of Nutrition Education 26, 3436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80832-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro-Mujica, P, García, A, Gómez-Castro, AG, Acero, R, Perea, J, Rodríguez-Estévez, V, Aguilar, C and Vera, R (2011) Technical efficiency and viability of organic dairy sheep farming systems in a traditional area for sheep production in Spain. Small Ruminant Research: The Journal of the International Goat Association 100, 8995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzouramani, I, Sintori, A, Liontakis, A, Karanikolas, P and Alexopoulos, G (2011) An assessment of the economic performance of organic dairy sheep farming in Greece. Livestock Science 141, 136142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valls, D (2017) Organic solutions from a global and local perspective. Bio Eco Actual BioFach Sp, 8–9.Google Scholar
Van Loo, EJ, Caputo, V, Nayga, RM and Verbeke, W (2014) Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy 49, 137150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veysset, P, Bécherel, F and Bébin, D (2009) Elevage biologique de bovins allaitants dans le Massif Central: Résultats technico-économiques et identifications des principaux verrous. Productions Animales 22, 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar