Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:49:11.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermophilic solid state anaerobic digestion of switchgrass for liquid digestate reuse and organic fertilizer production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2019

Jianjun Zang Open the ORCID record for Jianjun Zang [Opens in a new window] ,
Jason C. H. Shih ,
Jay J. Cheng ,
Zhimin Liu ,
Ying Liu  and
Wenqing Lu
Jianjun Zang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing100193, China
Jason C. H. Shih
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695, USA
Jay J. Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695, USA
Zhimin Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695, USA
Ying Liu
Affiliation:
Guangdong Engineering Research Centre for Marine Algal Biotechnology, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-environmental Science, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518060, China
Wenqing Lu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing100193, China
*
Author for correspondence: Jianjun Zang, E-mail: zangjj@cau.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two solid state anaerobic digesters (SSADs), 15 L each, were set up for co-digestion of switchgrass with primary digestate of a liquid anaerobic digester (LAD) and the recirculating leachate. Both the LAD and two SSADs were operated at 50°C. The results showed that the bioreactors were not started up stably until day 16 and day 47 for reactors A and B, respectively. The supplement of LAD digestate or injection of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) into the recirculating leachate readily reinitiated the biogas production to normal daily high rates of the two individual SSADs, one on day 16 and the other on day 47. In contrast to reactor A, there was a longer lag phase for bioreactor B, however, it showed 46.2% [77.9 vs 53.3 L kg−1 volatile solid (VS)] more cumulative biogas yields, and higher reduction rate of total solid, VS, cellulose and hemicellulose of 29.5, 31, 40.6 and 15%, respectively, which was likely due to optimized pH and NaOH pretreated switchgrass during start-up period. Methane contents of biogas increased gradually and stabilized at 50% for both reactors, indicating a normal operation of anaerobic digestion lasted for at least 100 days. The determined parameters of digested residues met China organic fertilizer standard (NY 525-2012) except for high moisture and low total nutrient contents. Therefore, the product of SSAD has the potential value of organic fertilizer. It is concluded that the LAD digestate can be reused as inoculums by co-digestion with agricultural residues for biogas and organic fertilizer production in SSAD.

Keywords

Biogasliquid digestateorganic fertilizerreusesolid state anaerobic co-digestionswitchgrass
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 503 - 512
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Contributed equally to this work.

References

Ahn, HK, Smith, MC, Kondrad, SL and White, JW (2010) Evaluation of biogas production potential by dry anaerobic digestion of switchgrass-animal manure mixtures. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 160, 965–975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
APHA (American Public Health Association) (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edn. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Brown, D and Li, Y (2013) Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresource Technology 127, 75–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budzianowski, WM (2016) A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 54, 1148–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, , Cheng, JJ, Liu, ZM, Gontupil, J and Kwon, OS (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and digested swine manure with different total solid concentration for methane production. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 7, 79–90.Google Scholar
Dhar, H, Kumar, P, Kumar, S, Mukherjee, S and Vaidya, AN (2016) Effect of organic loading rate during anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology 217, 56–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Divya, D, Gopinath, LR and Merlin-Christy, P (2015) A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42, 690–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevez, MM, Linjordet, R and Morken, J (2012) Effects of steam explosion and co-digestion in the methane production from Salix by mesophilic batch assays. Bioresource Technology 104, 749–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) FAO Statistical Pocketbook 2015. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Frigon, JC, Mehta, P and Guiot, SR (2012) Impact of mechanical, chemical and enzymatic pre-treatments on the methane yield from the anaerobic digestion of switchgrass. Biomass and Bioenergy 36, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, D, Peng, X, Gong, Q and Xia, W (2012) Pollution of livestock and poultry feces and countermeasures. Acta Agricuh Zhejiangeusis 24, 1164–1170.Google Scholar
Hagos, K, Zong, J, Li, D, Liu, C and Lu, X (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76, 1485–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C, Zhou, Y, Lu, WJ and Nges, IA (2019) Enhancement of the solid-state anaerobic digestion of rice straw by liquor supplementation. Bioresource Technology Reports 5, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J, Li, Y, Bo, Y and Xie, S (2016) High-resolution historical emission inventories of crop residue burning in fields in China for the period 1990–2013. Atmospheric Environment 138, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Park, SY and Zhu, J (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, 821–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Zhang, R, He, Y, Zhang, C, Liu, X, Chen, C and Liu, G (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and corn stover in batch and continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR). Bioresource Technology 156, 342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, YY, Xu, FQ, Li, Y, Lu, JX, Shah, A, Zhang, XH, Zhang, HY, Gong, XY and Li, GX (2018) Reactor performance and energy analysis of solid state anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with corn stover and tomato residues. Waste Management 73, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liew, LN, Shi, J and Li, Y (2011) Enhancing the solid-state anaerobic digestion of fallen leaves through simultaneous alkaline treatment. Bioresource Technology 102, 8828–8834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liew, LN, Shi, J and Li, Y (2012) Methane production from solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy 46, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, L and Li, Y (2017) Sequential batch thermophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass via recirculating digestate as inoculum-Part I: Reactor performance. Bioresource Technology 236, 186–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, ZM (2017) Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with corn stover for biogas production (Ph.D. dissertation). Raleigh: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Mao, C, Feng, Y, Wang, X and Ren, G (2015) Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45, 540–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mata-Alvarez, J, Macé, S and Llabrés, P (2000) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresource Technology 74, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture of China (2012) China organic fertilizer standard (NY 525-2012). Beijing: China Agriculture Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture of China (2016) Circular of the general office of the ministry of agriculture on improving the work of pilot bases of agricultural waste recycling and national pilot demonstration bases of sustainable agricultural development. Gazette of the Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China 157, 25–26.Google Scholar
Molina, MJ, Soriano, MD, Ingelmo, F and Llinares, J (2013) Stabilisation of sewage sludge and vinasse bio-wastes by vermicomposting with rabbit manure using Eisenia fetida. Bioresource Technology 137, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motte, JC, Escudie, R, Bernet, N, Delgenes, JP, Steyer, JP and Dumas, C (2013) Dynamic effect of total solid content, low substrate/inoculum ratio and particle size on solid-state anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology 144, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niu, H, Kong, X, Li, L, Sun, Y, Yuan, Z and Zhou, X (2015) Analysis of biogas produced from switchgrass by anaerobic digestion. Bioresources 10, 7178–7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patinvoh, RJ, Osadolor, OA, Chandolias, K, Sárvári-Horváth, I and Taherzadeh, MJ (2017) Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production. Bioresource Technology 224, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinzema, A, Boone, M, van Knippenberg, K and Lettinga, G (1994) Bactericidal effect of long chain fatty acids in anaerobic digestion. Water Environment Research 66, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawatdeenarunat, C, Surendra, KC, Takara, D, Oechsner, H and Khanal, SK (2015) Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology 178, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, X, Huang, G, Yang, Z and Han, L (2015) Compositional characteristics and energy potential of Chinese animal manure by type and as a whole. Applied Energy 160, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, J, Wang, Z, Stiverson, JA, Yu, Z and Li, Y (2013) Reactor performance and microbial community dynamics during solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresource Technology 136, 574–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, J, Xu, F, Wang, Z, Stiverson, JA, Yu, Z and Li, Y (2014) Effects of microbial and non-microbial factors of liquid anaerobic digestion effluent as inoculum on solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Bioresource Technology 157, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sluiter, A, Hames, B, Ruiz, R, Scarlata, C, Sluiter, J, Templeton, D and Crocker, D (2012) Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. NREL/TP-510-42618[R]. Golden, USA: National Renewable Laboratory.Google Scholar
Song, Z, Zhang, C, Yang, G, Feng, Y, Ren, G and Han, X (2014) Comparison of biogas development from households and medium and large-scale biogas plants in rural China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speece, RE (ed.) (1996) Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters. Nashville, TN: Archae Press.Google Scholar
Wang, S and Zhang, C (2008) Spatial and temporal distribution of air pollutant emissions from open burning of crop residues in China. China Science Paper 3, 329–333.Google Scholar
Wang, YY, Li, GX, Chi, MH, Sun, YB, Zhang, JX, Jiang, SX and Cui, ZJ (2018) Effects of co-digestion of cucumber residues to corn stover and pig manure ratio on methane production in solid state anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology 250, 328–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, LP, Sharvelle, SE and DeLong, SK (2016) Enhanced anaerobic digestion performance via combined solids- and leachate-based hydrolysis reactor inoculation. Bioresource Technology 220, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F, Wang, ZW and Li, Y (2014) Predicting the methane yield of lignocellulosic biomass in mesophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion based on feedstock characteristics and process parameters. Bioresource Technology 173, 168–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, Z, Song, Z, Li, D, Yuan, Y, Liu, X and Zheng, T (2015) The effects of initial substrate concentration, C/N ratio, and temperature on solid-state anaerobic digestion from composting rice straw. Bioresource Technology 177, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, L, Xu, F, Ge, X and Li, Y (2015) Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 44, 824–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L, Ge, X and Li, Y (2016) Recovery of failed solid-state anaerobic digesters. Bioresource Technology 214, 866–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X, Li, Q, Tang, Z, Zhang, W, Yu, G, Shen, Q and Zhao, FJ (2017) Heavy metal concentrations and arsenic speciation in animal manure composts in China. Waste Management 64, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, T, Mao, C, Zhai, N, Wang, X and Yang, G (2015) Influence of initial pH on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and maize stalk. Waste Management 35, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, J, Wan, C and Li, Y (2010) Enhanced solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresource Technology 101, 7523–7528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed