Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:46:22.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy approaches to energy and resource use in US agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Ann Sorensen  and
Jimmy Daukas
Ann Sorensen*
Affiliation:
American Farmland Trust Center for Agriculture in the Environment, P.O. Box 987, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Jimmy Daukas
Affiliation:
American Farmland Trust Center for Agriculture in the Environment, P.O. Box 987, DeKalb, IL, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: asorensen@niu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Improving energy and resource use in US agriculture begins with the soil. Healthy soils improve air and water quality, increase land productivity, help resist the effects of drought and floods, improve energy efficiency and enhance the ability to mitigate climate change. In 1993, the US Board on Agriculture concluded that national policy should seek to: conserve and enhance soil quality as a fundamental first step to improve the environment; increase the efficiency of nutrient, pesticide and irrigation use in farming systems; increase the resistance of farming systems to erosion and runoff; and make greater use of field and landscape buffer zones, all delivered through farm system management plans. Despite their detailed analysis and thoughtful approach, only a few of their recommendations were implemented. But now, calls from the scientific community to improve resource and energy use in agriculture are becoming more urgent in tone and could help drive policy reform. We review the reasons behind this rising sense of urgency, highlight some of the potential policy drivers along with policy ‘game changers’ and offer policy options. We argue to expand our view of agriculture as a source not only of food, fiber, biofuels and renewable energy but also of other critical ecosystem services, like cleaner water, carbon sequestration and wildlife habitat, and to adjust policies to realize this potential on all agricultural lands. We recommend undertaking a second National Agricultural Land Study as a basis to develop a clear national strategy to help US agriculture meet the challenges it will face in the coming decades. For the short term, we offer incremental policies to improve energy and resource use and, for the long term, we offer a vision of what that national strategy might include once the necessary analyses are completed and consensus is reached.

Keywords

agricultural policy optionssustainable use of energy and resources in US agriculturefarm policy reformmultifunctional agriculture
Type
Invited Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 25 , Special Issue 2: “Sustainable Agriculture Systems in a Resource Limited Future” , June 2010 , pp. 109 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Holdren, J. 2008. Science and technology for sustainable well-being. Science 319:424–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report 2005. Available at Web site: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/article.aspx?id=58 (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
3Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor, R., and Plasky, S. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Babcock, B. 2008. Charting growth in food demand. Iowa Agricultural Review Online 14 (3 ). Available at Web site: http://www.card.iastate.edu/iowa_ag_review/summer_08/article4.aspx (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
5Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
6U.S. Global Change Research Program. 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Available at Web site: http://www.globalchange.gov/usimpacts (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
7Rockstrom, R., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S. III, Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellinhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., ven derLeeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Synder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., and Foley, J.A. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Johnson, R. 2009. Climate Change: The Role of the U.S. Agricultural Sector and Congressional Action. Congressional Research Service RL33893.Google Scholar
9Easterling, W.E. III, Hurd, B.H., and Smith, J.B. 2004. Coping with Global Climate Change: The Role of Adaptation in the United States. Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
10Megdal, S.B., Hamann, R., Harter, T., Jawitz, J.W., and Jess, J.M. 2009. Water, People and the Future: Water Availability for Agriculture in the United States. Issue Paper No. 44. CAST, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
11Nelson, G.C. 2009. Agriculture and Climate Change: An Agenda for Negotiation in Copenhagen. Focus 16, Brief 1, May 2009. International Food Policy Institute.Google Scholar
12U.S. EPA. Available at Web site: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/effects/agriculture.html#ref (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
13Soil and Water Conservation Society. 2003. Conservation Implications of Climate Change: Soil Erosion and Runoff from Cropland. A Report from the Soil and Water Conservation Society, January 2003.Google Scholar
14Havlin, J. 2008. U.S. Agriculture: Meeting Future Demand for Food, Fiber and Fuel. Available at Web site: http://www.agry.purdue.edu/CCA/2008/Proceedings/HavlinSW.pdf (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
15Farm Foundation. 2008. The Thirty Year Challenge: Agriculture's Strategic Role in Feeding and Fueling a Growing World. Available at Web site: http://www.farmfoundation.org/default.aspx (verified 4 February 2010).Google Scholar
16National Academy of Sciences. 1993. Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. National Research Council Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
17Morgan, D. 2010. The Farm Bill and Beyond. Economic Policy Paper Services 2010. The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18Arha, K. and Josling, T. 2007. Promoting the economic resilience and conserving the ecological integrity of American farmlands. In Arha, K., Josling, T., Summer, D.A., and Thompson, B.H. (eds). U.S. Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill. Woods Institute for the Environment. Stanford University. p. 1–4. Available at Web site: http://woods.stanford.edu/ideas/farmbill/results.html (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
19Arha, K., Josling, T., Sumner, D.A., and Thompson, B.H. 2007. Conserving ecosystem services across agrarian landscapes. In Arha, K., Josling, T., Summer, D.A., and Thompson, B.H. (eds). U.S. Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill. Woods Institute for the Environment. Stanford University. p. 207–229.Google Scholar
20Cox, C. 2007. U.S. agricultural conservation policy and programs: history, trends and implications. In Arha, K., Josling, T., Summer, D.A., and Thompson, B.H. (eds). U.S. Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill. Woods Institute for the Environment. Stanford University. p. 113–146. Available at Web site: http://woods.stanford.edu/ideas/farmbill/results.htmlGoogle Scholar
21Smith, K.R. 2001. Retooling Farm Policy. Issues in Science and Technology Online Summer 2001 Available at Web site: http://www.issues.org/17.4/smith.htm (verified 3 February 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22FAO. 2007. Adaptation to Climate Change in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Perspective, Framework and Priorities. Interdepartmental Working Group on Climate Change. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
23USDA Economic Research Service. 2009. A Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of HR 2454 on U.S. Agriculture. Office of the Chief Economist, USDA–ERS.Google Scholar
2425×25 Coalition. 2009. Summary of Recent Cost Impact Data. American Clean Energy Security Act of 2009 (H,R, 2454). Available at Web site: http://www.25×25.org/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
25Ribaudo, M. 2008. Offsets vs. Allowances. Prepared for: Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change Workshop, 13–14 August 2008, Washington, DC. American Farmland Trust, USDA Economic Research Service and Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
26Lewandrowski, J. 2008. Additionality. Prepared for Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change Workshop, 13–14 August 2008, Washington, DC. American Farmland Trust, USDA Economic Research Service and Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
27Lewandrowski, J. 2008. Leakage. Prepared for Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change Workshop. 13–14 August 2008, Washington, DC. American Farmland Trust, USDA Economic Research Service and Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
28Murray, B.C. 2008. Addressing permanence and reversal risk in agriculture, Land use change and forest carbon projects. Prepared for Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change Workshop, 13–14 August 2008. American Farmland Trust, USDA Economic Research Service and Farm Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
29Olander, L. 2008. Treatment of early actors in a Federal Cap and Trade. Prepared for Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change Workshop, 13–14 August 2008, Washington, DC. American Farmland Trust, USDA Economic Research Service and Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
30Kraft, S.E. and Lant, C. 2008. Monitoring, compliance and enforcement. Prepared for Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change Workshop, 13–14 August 2008, Washington, DC. American Farmland Trust, USDA Economic Research Service and Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
31American Farmland Trust, Farm Foundation and USDA Economic Research Service. 2008. Agriculture's Role in Mitigating Climate Change. In Proceedings of the Large Group Workshop Summary Discussion. American Farmland Trust, Farm Foundation and USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC. Available along with briefing papers at Web site: http://www.farmland.org/programs/environment/workshops/August-2008-public.asp (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
3225×25 Coalition. 2009. Work must continue on Senate Climate Bill. Available at Web site: http://blog.25×25.org/?p=1077 (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
33Cox, C. and Hug, A. 2009. Crying wolf: Climate change far greater threat to farmers than climate legislation: Cost of House ACES Bill is pocket change per acre for most crops. Environmental Working Group. October 2009. Available at Web site: http://www.ewg.org/agmag (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
34Babcock, B. 2009. Costs and benefits to agriculture from climate change policies. Iowa Agricultural Review Online 15(3).Google Scholar
35U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture. Office of Atmospheric Programs (6207 J), Washington, DC. EPA 430-R-05-006 November 2005.Google Scholar
36Branosky, E. 2006. Agriculture and climate change: The policy context. WRI Policy Note Climate: Agriculture No. 1. World Resources Institute. October 2006.Google Scholar
37Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Available at Web site: http://www.pewclimate.org/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
38USDA NRCS. 2001. A Resources Conservation Act Report. Interim Appraisal and Analysis of Conservation Alternatives. September 2001.Google Scholar
39Lal, R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Flynn, H., Smith, P., Bindi, M., Trombi, G., Oudendag, D., and Rousseva, S. 2007. Policy incentives for climate change mitigation agricultural techniques. Deliverable D3: Practice description and analysis report. PICCMAT.Google Scholar
41Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., and Yu, T.-H. 2008. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Liska, A.J., Yang, H.S., Bremer, V.R., Klopfenstein, T.J., Walters, D.T., Erickson, G.E., and Cassman, K.G. 2009. Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13:58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Mathews, J.A. and Tan, H. 2009. Biofuels and Indirect Land Use Change Effects: The Debate Continues. Biofuels, Bioproducts, Bioreferences147. Published online in Wiley InterScience: http://www.interscience.wiley.com. (verified 3 February 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Kemp, L. 2007. Testimony. Senior Policy Analyst, The Minnesota Project Hearing on Renewable Energy.Google Scholar
45Robertson, G.P., Dale, V.H., Doering, I.C., Hamburg, S.P., Melillo, J.M., Wander, M.M., Parton, W.J., Adler, P.R., Barney, J.N., Cruse, R.M., Duke, C.S., Fearnside, P.M., Follet, R.F., Gibbs, H.K., Goldemberg, J., Mladenoff, D.J., Ojima, D., Palmer, M.W., Sharply, A., Wallace, L., Weathers, K.C., Wiens, J.A. and Wilhelm, W.W. 2008. Sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322:49–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46McKnight Foundation. 2006. Symposium on Sustainable Feedstocks for Biofuels Production, 2–3 March 2006, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
47Cassman, K.G. 2006. Predicting the efficiency and environmental impact of corn-ethanol production systems. Ethanol Producer. January 2006.Google Scholar
48Cassman, K.G., Dobermann, A., and Walters, D.T. 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency and nitrogen management. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31(2):132–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49U.S. Department of Energy. Available at Web site: http://www.eia.doe.gov/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
50Goldman, R.L., Thompson, B.H., and Daily, G.D. 2007. Managing for ecosystem services on U.S. agricultural lands. In Arha, K., Josling, T., Summer, D.A., and Thompson, B.H. (eds). U.S. Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill. Woods Institute for the Environment. Stanford University. p. 97–112.Google Scholar
51Schnepf, R. 2007. Agriculture-based renewable energy production. Congressional Research Service Report RL32712.Google Scholar
52Liebrand, C. and Ling, K.C. 2009. Switching on cow power: Co-ops can play role in turning dairy waste into energy and byproducts. Rural Cooperatives, January/February 2009: p. 18–20.Google Scholar
53Ruhl, J.B. 2001. Keeping the Agriculture in Sustainable Agriculture: The Challenge of Environmental Policy Reform for Agriculture in the American Midwest. World Wildlife Fund, American Farmland Trust and Winrock International Henry A. Wallace Center for Agricultural and Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
54Chesapeake Bay Program. Available at Web site: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
55Thompson, B.H. 2006. Green Certification Programs. Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 15 September 2006.Google Scholar
56IPM Institute of North America, Inc. 2008 IPM Institute News: IPM in the Marketplace. Volume 9(1). Available at Web site: http://ipminstitute.org/newsletter/newsletter_v9i1.htm (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
57Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture Volume 3 Complete for Methods and Results. OECD, Paris, France.Google Scholar
58Field to market. Available at Web site: http://www.fieldtomarket.org and Stewardship index for specialty crops website: www.stewardshipindex.org (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
59Iowa Soybean Association. Available at Web site: http://www.iasoybeans.com/environment/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
60Sustainable Agriculture Standards. Available at Web site: http://redesign.leonardoacademy.org/programs/standards/agstandard.html) (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
61Walmart Sustainability efforts are profiled. Available at Web site: http://walmartstores.com/sustainability/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
62Robertson, G.P., Allen, V.G., Boody, G., Boose, E.R., Creamer, N.G., Drinkwater, L.E., Gosz, J.R., Lynch, L., Havlin, J.L., Jackson, L.E., Pickett, S.T.A., Pitelka, L., Randall, A., Reed, A.S., Seastedt, T.R., Waide, R.B., and Wall, D.H. 2008. Long-term agricultural research: a research, education and extension imperative. BioScience 58(7):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63CEAP (Conservation Assessment Effects Program). Available at Web site: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/TECHNICAL/NRI/ceap/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
64USDA SARE. Available at Web site: http://www.sare.org (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
65European Commission. Information on the European Union's approach to climate change mitigation and adaption can be found at Web site: http://ec.europa.eu/ (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
66United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2008. Challenges and opportunities for mitigation in the agricultural sector. Technical Paper. FCCC/TP/2008/8. GE.08-64351.Google Scholar
67IPCC Working Group II. 2009. Summary for policymakers: scientific-technical analyses of impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change – IPCC Working Group II. Available from Web site: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html (verified 4 February 2010).Google Scholar
68Kahn, B. and Zaks, D.P.M. 2009. Investing in agriculture: Far-reaching challenge, significant opportunity. An asset management perspective. DB Climate Change Advisors. Deutsche Bank Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69ICC Task Force on Convention on Biological Diversity. 2008. Sustainable Agriculture Contributions by the Private Sector. Integrated biodiversity conservation into agricultural production. Replicating and scaling up winning solutions. Discussion Paper. International Chamber of Commerce. Document 213-15/2.Google Scholar
70Searle, B. and Cox, S. 2009. The State of Ecosystem Services. The Bridgespan Group. Boston, MA, New York, NY and San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
71Kieser & Associates. 2004. Preliminary economic analysis of water quality trading opportunities in the Great Miami River Watershed, Ohio. Prepared for the Miami Conservancy District, 23 July 2004.Google Scholar
72Selman, M., Greenhalgh, S., Branosky, E., Jones, C., and Guiling, J. 2009. Water quality trading programs: An international overview. World Resources Institute Brief No. 1.Google Scholar
73Ribaudo, M.O. and Nickerson, C.J. 2009. Agriculture and water quality trading: exploring the possibilities. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74Kraft, S.E. 2008. Ecosystem services: A 21st century challenge. Choices 2nd Quarter 23(2):26–27.Google Scholar
75Ruhl, J.B. 2008. Agriculture and ecosystem services: Strategies for state and local governments. New York University Environmental Law Journal 17:424–454.Google Scholar
76Swinton, S. 2008. Reimaging farms as managed ecosystems. Choices 2nd Quarter 23(2):28–31.Google Scholar
77Ruhl, J.D., Kraft, S.E., and Lant, C.L. 2007. The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
78Thompson, B.H. 2008. Ecosystem services and natural capital: reconceiving environmental management. New York University Environmental Law Journal 17:460–489.Google Scholar
79Farmland Information Center. Summary, National Agricultural Land Study. Available at Web site: http://www.farmlandinfo.org (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
80Gray, R. 1981. The National Agricultural Lands study: an interview with Robert Gray. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Society 36(2):62–68.Google Scholar
81Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2007. National Science and Technology Council Interagency Working Group, A Plan for a U.S. National Land Imaging Program. August 2007.Google Scholar
82Blandford, D. and Josling, T. 2009. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policies and Agriculture: Implications for Production Incentives and International Trade Disciplines. ICTSD-IPC Platform on Climate Change, Agriculture and Trade. Issue Brief No. I. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland and International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83American Farmland Trust. 2006. Agenda 2007: A new framework and direction of U.S. Farm Policy. Available at Web site: http://www.farmland.org/programs/campaign/Agenda2007.asp (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
84FAO. 2001. The Economics of Conservation Agriculture. Available at Web site: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/Y2781E/y2781e00.htm#toc (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
85Ruhl, J.B. 2002. Three questions for agriculture about the environment. Plenary speech delivered on 14 February 2002 at the 8th Annual PIEC, University of Florida.Google Scholar
86Claassen, R. 2007. Emphasis shifts in U.S. conservation policy. Amber Waves. Perspectives on Food and Farm Policy, Volume 5, May 2007. USDA, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/May07SpecialIssue/Features/Emphasis.htm (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
87Robertson, D.M., Schwartz, G.E., Saad, D.A., and Alexander, R.B. 2009. Incorporating uncertainty into the ranking of SPARROW model nutrient yields from the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin watersheds. Available at Web site: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/nutrient_yields/ (verified February 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88Townsend, A.R. and Roobert, R.W. 2010. Fixing the global nitrogen problem. Scientific American 2010 (February):64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89Ruhl, J.B. 2008. Agriculture and Ecosystem Services: Strategies for State and Local Governments. NYU Environmental Law Journal 17(1). Available at Web site http://ssm.com/abstract=1367292 (verified 10 March 2010).Google Scholar
90Caswell, M., Fuglie, K., Ingram, C., Jans, S., and Kascak, C. 2001. Adoption of agricultural production practices: Lessons learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture area studies project. USDA ERS Report No. 792.Google Scholar
91Makuch, J., Gagnon, S., and Sherman, T. 2004. Implementing agricultural conservation practices: Barriers and incentives. A conservation effects assessment bibliography. Special Reference Briefs Series 2004-02.Google Scholar
92Stubbs, M. 2007. Technical assistance for agriculture conservation. Congressional Research Service RL34069.Google Scholar
93Farm Foundation. 2009. Agriculture research and productivity for the future. Farm Foundation Issue Paper. Available at Website: http://www.farmfoundation.org (verified 3 February 2010).Google Scholar
94Becker, G.S. 2005. Farm Commodity Programs: A short primer. Congressional Research Service RS20848, 7 February 2005.Google Scholar
95Dimitri, C., Effland, A., and Conklin, N. 2005. The 20th century transformation of US Agriculture and Farm Policy. USDA ERS Economic Information Bulletin No. 3.Google Scholar