Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Distance to slaughter, markets and feed sources used by small-scale food animal operations in the United States

  • A.L. Beam (a1), D.D. Thilmany (a2), R.W. Pritchard (a1), L.P. Garber (a1), D.C. Van Metre (a3) and F.J. Olea-Popelka (a3)...

Abstract

Distances to common production and marketing supply chain destinations may vary, and this has economic and animal health implications for small-scale food animal operations. Proximity to these destinations can affect the economic viability and marketing decisions of small-scale operations and may represent significant barriers to sustainability. Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey conducted by the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Animal Health Monitoring System in 2011 using a stratified systematic sample of 16,000 small-scale (gross annual farm sales between US$10,000 and 499,999) operations from all 50 states. A total of 7925 food-animal operations were asked about the farthest one-way distance (in miles) to slaughter facilities, destinations where they sold animals or products, and feed sources. Across all small-scale operations, 95% of operations reported the farthest distance animals or products were transported for sale was 241 km (150 miles) or less. For distance to slaughter facilities, 95% of operations reported the farthest distance was 145 km (90 miles) or less. For feed shipped by a supplier, 95% of operations reported the farthest distance was 322 km (200 miles) or less. The 95th percentile for distance increased as farm sales increased, indicating larger operations were more likely to travel long distances. The results of this study are an important benchmark for understanding the economic and animal health implications of long transportation distances for operations that are small and/or focused on direct marketing.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: andrea.L.beam@aphis.usda.gov

References

Hide All
1Hoppe, R.A., MacDonald, J.M., and Korb, P. 2010. Small Farms in the United States: Persistence Under Pressure. Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-63). United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington DC.
2Goodsell, M., Stanton, T., McLaughlin, J., and Reith, A. 2010. A resource guide to direct marketing livestock and poultry: revised edition. New York Small Farm Work Team. Available at Web site http://www.nyfarmersmarket.com/publications/ResourceGuideDirectMarketingMeatPoultry.pdf (accessed August 1, 2013).
3Lewis, C.B. and Peters, C.J. 2012. A capacity assessment of New England's large animal slaughter facilities as relative to meat production for the regional food system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:192199.
4Haley, C., Dewey, C.E., Widowski, T., and Friendship, R. 2008. Factors associated with in-transit losses of market hogs in Ontario in 2011. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 72(5):377384.
5Bonelli, J., Herbert, S., and Castrataro, K. 2009. Survey of Livestock Producers in Southern New England: Producing Natural Local Meats for Consumers. University of Connecticut College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Storrs, CT.
6Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture. 2008. Demand study: assessing volume and attributes of farmer demand for slaughter and meat processing services in Massachusetts. Final Report for USDA Rural Development: Rural Business Enterprise Grant Program.
7Shepstone, T. 2006. Southern Maryland meat processing feasibility study. Shepstone Management Company: Planning and Research Consultants. Available at Web site http://www.shepstone.net/SouthernMD.pdf (accessed May 14, 2013).
8Durham, C. 2009. Northwest Meat and Livestock Processor and Producer Survey on State Inspection Program. SR-1089-E. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, OR.
9Kao, R.R., Green, D.M., Johnson, J., and Kiss, I. 2007. Disease dynamics over very different time-scales: Foot-and-mouth disease and scrapie on the network of livestock movements in the UK. Journal of the Royal Society 4:907916.
10Halvorson, D.A. 2009. Prevention and management of avian influenza outbreaks: Experiences from the United States of America. Revue Scientifique et Technique 28:359369.
11National Audit Office, United Kingdom. 2002. The 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. HC 939 Session 2001–2002: 21 June 2002. London: The Stationery Office. Available at Web site http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0102/the_2001_outbreak_of_foot_and.aspx (accessed August 1, 2013).
12Dorea, F.C., Vieira, A.R., Hofacre, C., Waldrip, D., and Cole, D.J. 2010. Stochastic model of the potential spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza from an infected commercial broiler operation in Georgia. Avian Diseases 54:713719.
13Moreno-Lopez, J. 2002. Contaminants in feed for food-producing animals. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences 5:123125.
14Wagner, M., Melzner, D., Bago, Z., Winter, P., Egerbacher, M., Schilcher, F., Zangana, A., and Schoder, D. 2005. Outbreak of clinical listeriosis in sheep: Evaluation from possible contamination routes from feed to raw produce and humans. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, B. Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health 52:278283.
15Osterberg, J., Vagsholm, I., Boqvist, S., and Lewerin, S.S. 2006. Feed-borne outbreak of Salmonella cubana in Swedish pig farms: Risk factors and factors affecting the restriction period in infected farms. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 47:1321.
16Windl, O. and Dawson, M. 2012. Animal prion diseases. Subcellular Biochemistry 65:497516.
17Jenkins, D.J., Brown, G.K., and Traub, R.J. 2013. ‘Cysticercosis storm’ in feedlot cattle in north-west New South Wales. Australian Veterinary Journal 91:8993.
18Vernon, M.C. 2011. Demographics of cattle movements in the United Kingdom. BMC Veterinary Research 7:31.
19Baptista, F.M. and Nunes, T. 2007. Spatial analysis of cattle movement patterns in Portugal. Veterinaria Italiana 43:611619.
20Lentz, H., Kasper, M., and Selhorst, T. 2009. Network analysis of the German cattle trade net – preliminary results. Berliner und Muenchener Tieraerztliche Wochenschrift 122:193198.
21Aznar, M.N., Stevenson, M.A., Zarich, L., and Leon, E.A. 2011. Analysis of cattle movements in Argentina, 2005. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 98:119127.
22Dominguez, B.J. 2007. Characterization of Livestock Herds in Extensive Agricultural Settings in Southwest Texas. Office of Graduate Studies. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
23Shields, D., and Mathews, K. Jr. 2003. Outlook report: interstate livestock movements. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ldp/jun03/ldpm10801/ldpm10801.pdf (accessed August 1, 2013).
24Lindstrom, T., Grear, D.A., Buhnerkempe, M., Webb, C.T., Miller, R., Portacci, K., and Wennergren, U. 2013. A bayesian approach for modeling cattle movements in the United States: Scaling up a partially observed network. PloS One 8(1):e53432.
25Low, S. and Vogel, S. 2011. Direct and Intermediated Marketing of Local Foods in the United States. Economic Research Report-128. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington DC.
26Beam, A., Thilmany, D., Garber, L., Van Metre, D., Pritchard, R., Kopral, C., and Olea-Popelka, F. 2013. Factors affecting use of veterinarians by small-scale food animal operations. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 243(9):13341344.
27USDA. 2012. An In-depth Study of Small-Scale U.S. Livestock Operations, 2011. United States Department of Agriculture–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service–Veterinary Services–Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado. #618.0212.
28Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2005. EpiInfo Ver. 3.3.2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
29Lindstrom, T., Sisson, S.A., Noremark, M., Jonsson, A., and Wennergren, U. 2009. Estimation of distance related probability of animal movements between holdings and implications for disease spread modeling. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 91:8594.
30Grandin, T. 2000. Introduction: Management and Economic Factors of Handling and Transport. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
31Perez, M.P., Palacio, J., Santolaria, M.P., Acena, M.C., Chacon, G., Gascon, M., Calvo, J.H., Zaragoza, P., Beltran, J.A., and Garcia-Belenguer, S. 2002. Effect of transport time on welfare and meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 61:425433.
32Gosalvez, L.F., Averos, X., Valdelvira, J.J., and Herranz, A. 2006. Influence of season, distance and mixed loads on the physical and carcass integrity of pigs transported to slaughter. Meat Science 73:553558.
33Dewell, G.A., Simpson, C.A., Dewell, R.D., Hyatt, D.R., Belk, K.E., Scanga, J.A., Morley, P.S., Grandin, T., Smith, G.C., Dargatz, D.A., Wagner, B.A., and Salman, M.D. 2008. Impact of transportation and lairage on hide contamination with Escherichia coli O157 in finished beef cattle. Journal of Food Protection 71:11141118.
34Yalcin, S., and Guler, H.C. 2012. Interaction of transport distance and body weight on preslaughter stress and breast meat quality of broilers. British Poultry Science 53:175182.
35Torrey, S., Bergeron, R., Faucitano, L., Widowski, T., Lewis, N., Crowe, T., Correa, J.A., Brown, J., Hayne, S., and Gonyou, H.W. 2013. Transportation of market-weight pigs 2. Effect of season and location within truck on behavior with an 8-h transport. Journal of Animal Science 91(6):28722878.
36Marshall, E.S., Carpenter, T.E., and Thunes, C. 2009. Results of a survey to estimate cattle movements and contact rates among beef herds in California, with reference to the potential spread and control of foot-and-mouth disease. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 235:573579.
37MacDonald, J.M. and Korb, P. 2011. Agricultural Contracting Update: Contracts in 2008. Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-72). United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service, Washington DC.
38Brown, C., Miller, S., Boone, D., Boone, H. Jr, Gartin, S., and McConnell, T. 2007. The importance of farmers’ markets for West Virginia direct marketers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22(1):2029.
39Nickerson, C., Ebel, R., Borchers, A., and Carriazo, F. 2011. Major Uses of Land in the United States. Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-89). United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service, Washington DC.
40National Agricultural Statistics Service website. 2007. Census of Agriculture: U.S. agriculture by watersheds. United States Department of Agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online_Highlights/Fact_Sheets/Geographic/watersheds.pdf (accessed January 30, 2013).

Keywords

Distance to slaughter, markets and feed sources used by small-scale food animal operations in the United States

  • A.L. Beam (a1), D.D. Thilmany (a2), R.W. Pritchard (a1), L.P. Garber (a1), D.C. Van Metre (a3) and F.J. Olea-Popelka (a3)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed