Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:29:09.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brooklyn's agrarian questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Evan Weissman
Evan Weissman*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Food Studies, and Nutrition, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: eweissma@syr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout the USA, urban agriculture is expanding as a manifestation of an emerging American food politics. Through a case study of Brooklyn, New York, I used mixed qualitative research methods to investigate the political possibilities of urban agriculture for fostering food justice. My findings build on the existing alternative food network (AFN) literature by indicating that problematic contradictions rooted in the neoliberalization of urban agriculture limit the transformative possibilities of farming the city as currently practiced in Brooklyn. I suggest that longstanding agrarian questions—concerns over the relationship between agriculture and capitalism and the politics of small-scale producers—are informative for critical interrogation of urban agriculture as a politicization of food.

Keywords

agro-foodalternative food networkfood politicsneoliberalizationurban agriculture
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 30 , Special Issue 1: Innovations and Trends in Sustainable Urban Agriculture , February 2015 , pp. 92 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Allen, P. and Guthman, G. 2006. From ‘old school’ to ‘farm-to-school’: Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values 23:401–415.Google Scholar
2 Guthman, J. 2008. Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy. Geoforum 39:1241–1253.Google Scholar
3 Pudup, M.B. 2008. It takes a garden: Cultivating citizen-subjects in organized garden projects. Geoforum 39:1228–1240.Google Scholar
4 Goodman, D. 2003. The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: Reflections and agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 19:1–7.Google Scholar
5 Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., and Banks, J. 2000. Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography 76:107–125.Google Scholar
6 Lyson, T. 2004. Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community. Tufts University Press, Medford, MA.Google Scholar
7 Goodman, D., DuPuis, E.M., and Goodman, M. 2012. Alternative Food Networks: Knowledge, Practice, and Politics. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
8 Renting, H., Marsden, T., and Banks, J. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35:393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Allen, P., FitzSimmons, M., Goodman, M., and Warner, K. 2003. Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: The tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies 19:61–75.Google Scholar
10 Hinrichs, C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16:295–303.Google Scholar
11 Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
12 Peck, J. and Tickell, A. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34:380–404.Google Scholar
13 Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. 2002. Cities and geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34:349–379.Google Scholar
14 Biel, R. 2000. The New Imperialism: Crisis and Contradiction in North/South Relations. Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
15 Magdoff, F. 2004. A precarious existence: The fate of billions? Monthly Review 55, 9:1–14.Google Scholar
16 McMichael, P. 2010. The world food crisis in historical perspective. In Magdoff, F. and Tokar, B. (eds). Agriculture and Food in Crisis. Monthly Review Press, New York. p. 51–68.Google Scholar
17 Constance, D. 2009. The four questions in agrifood studies: A view from the bus. Agriculture and Human Values 26:3–14.Google Scholar
18 Moore, J. 2008. Ecological crises and the agrarian question in world-historical perspective. Monthly Review 60(6):54–63.Google Scholar
19 Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39:1171–1183.Google Scholar
20 Naumes, W. and Naumes, M. 1999. The Art and Craft of Case Writing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
21 Orum, A., Feagin, J., and Sjoberg, G. 1991. Introduction: The nature of case studies. In Feagin, J., Orum, A., and Sjoberg, G. (eds). A Case for the Case Study. UNC Press Chapel Hill, NC. p. 1–26.Google Scholar
22 Cresswell, J. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
23 Hennink, M., Hutter, I., and Bailey, A. 2011. Qualitative Research Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
24 Emerson, R., Fretz, R., and Shaw, L. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
25 Babbie, E. 1990. Survey Research Methods. 2nd ed. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
26 Dunn, K. 2000. Interviewing. In Hay, I. (ed.). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Oxford University Press, New York. p. 50–82.Google Scholar
27 Heyl, B. 2002. Ethnographic interviewing. In Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. (eds). Handbook of Ethnography. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
28 Koc, M. and Dahlberg, K. 1999. The restructuring of food systems: Trends, research, and policy issues. Agriculture and Human Values 16:109–116.Google Scholar
29 Guthman, J. 2011. Weighing In: Obesity, Food Justice, and the Limits of Capitalism. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
30 Beaulac, J., Kristjansson, E., and Cummins, S. 2009. A systematic review of food deserts, 1966–2007. Preventing Chronic Disease 6. Available at Web site http://www.cdc.gov/ped/issues/209/jul/08.htm (accessed May 1, 2011).Google Scholar
31 Lane, S.D., Keefe, R.H., Rubinstein, R., Levandowski, B.A., Webster, N., Cibula, D.A., Boahene, A.K., Dele-Michael, O., Carter, D., Jones, T., Wojtowycz, M., and Brill, J. 2008. Structural violence, urban retail food markets, and low birth weight. Health and Place 14:415–423.Google Scholar
32 Odoms-Young, A., Zenk, S., and Mason, M. 2009. Measuring food availability and access in African-American communities. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 36:145–150.Google Scholar
33 New York City Department of Planning. 2008. Going to market: New York City's grocery store and supermarket shortage. April 21. Available at Web site http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/supermarket/index.shtml (accessed June 1, 2014).Google Scholar
34 Gonzales, D. 2008. The lost supermarket: A breed in need of replenishment. The New York Times, May 5, p. B1.Google Scholar
35 Holt-Giménez, E., (ed.) 2011. Food Movements Unite! Food First Books, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
36 Gottlieb, R. and Joshi, A. 2010. Food Justice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
37 Davidson, A. 2012. Don't mock the artisanal-pickle makers. The New York Magazine, February 19, p. 14.Google Scholar
38 Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
39 Callinicos, A. 1999. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Polity, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
40 Kautsky, K. 1988. The Agrarian Question. Zwan Books, London (first published in 1899).Google Scholar
41 Henderson, G. 1999. California and the Fictions of Capital. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
42 Kloppenburg, J. and Hassanein, N. 2006. From old school to reform school? Agriculture and Human Values 23:417–421.Google Scholar