Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-dxfhg Total loading time: 0.224 Render date: 2021-03-04T17:13:35.059Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Renaissance Quarterly Renaissance Quarterly

Article contents

Marking Time: Astrology, Almanacs, and English Protestantism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Alison A. Chapman
Alison A. Chapman
Affiliation:
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay correlates changes in early modern astrological almanacs with broad changes in early modern English Protestant culture over the sixteenth and seventeenth century. These almanacs show an increasing tendency to be highly specific as to place and time and to suggest that precise times and precise places are given a larger meaning by their relationship to the stars and planets wheeling overhead. By lending a vertical significance to place and time, almanacs run counter to early modern Protestantism, which suggested that place and time have no inherent sacred significance. Thus the rise of the early modern astrological almanac may have been impelled by a desire on the part of early modern men and women to have time and place mean something.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , Winter 2007 , pp. 1257 - 1290
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Anne Lake Prescott for her helpful commentary on an earlier version of this article.

References

Allen, Don Cameron. The Star-Crossed Renaissance: The Quarrel about Astrology and Its Influence in England. New York, 1966Google Scholar
Allestree, Richard. A New Almanack and Prognostication. London, 1621.Google Scholar
An Almanack but for One Day: or, The Son of Man reckoning with Man upou an high Account Day. London, 1700–1799?Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London, 1991.Google Scholar
Barker, Francis. The Tremulous Private Body: Essays on Subjection. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Cyprian, Bladgen. “The Distribution of Almanacks in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century.” Studies in Bibliography 11 ( 1958 ): 107 – 16Google Scholar
Eustace F, Bosanquet. “English Seventeenth-Century Almanacks.” The Library 10 ( 1930 ): 361 – 97Google Scholar
Bretnor, Thomas. An Almanacke. London, 1615.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard. English Almanacs, 1500–1800: Astrology and the Popular Press. Ithaca, 1979.Google Scholar
Alison A, Chapman. “The Politics of Time in Edmund Spenser’s English Calendar.” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 42 ( 2002 ): 1 – 24 Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford, 1994.Google Scholar
Costner, Andrew, and Will Spicer, eds. Sacred Space in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Dariot, Claude. A Briefe and most easie Introduction to the Astrologicall Iudgement of the Starres. London, 1598.Google Scholar
Dauncy, Gervase. A new reformed Kalender, or Almanacke against Almanacks, for the yeare of our Redemption, 1615. London, 1615.Google Scholar
Dee, John. The Private Diary of Dr. John Dee. Ed. J. O. Halliwell. London, 1842.Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta. “The Ideology of Superfluous Things: King Lear as Period Piece.” In Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, ed. Margreta de Grazia, Peter Stallybrass, and Maureen Quilligan, 17–42. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Digges, Leonard. A Prognostication everlasting of ryght good effecte. London, 1556.Google Scholar
Donne, John. Ignatius his Conclave. London, 1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donne, John. John Donne’s Devotions upon Emergent Occasions together with Death’s Duel. Ann Arbor, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, Jonathan. Dove speculum anni á partu virginis MDCLXVII, or, an almanack for the year of our Lord God 1667. Cambridge, 1667.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c. 1400–c. 1580. New Haven, 1992.Google Scholar
Endymion, 1663, or the Man-In-The-Moon. London, 1663.Google Scholar
Escobedo, Andrew. Nationalism and Historical Loss in Renaissance England: Foxe, Dee, Spenser, Milton. Ithaca, 2003.Google Scholar
Euans, John. A new almanacke and prognostication. London, 1630.Google Scholar
Evelyn, John. The Diary of John Evelyn. Ed. E. S. De Beer. Oxford, 1955.Google Scholar
Fage, John. Speculum Aegrotorum, or the Sicke-mens Glasse. London, 1606.Google Scholar
Fine, Oronce. The rules and righte ample documents, touchinge the vse and practise of the common almanackes, which are named ephemerides. Trans. H. Baker. London, 1605.Google Scholar
Gadbury, John. Collectio geniturarum, or, A collection of nativities. London, 1662.Google Scholar
Gadbury, John. The Jamaica Almanack. London, 1673.Google Scholar
Gadbury, John. The West India or Jamaica Alamanack. London, 1674.Google Scholar
Gadbury, John. Cardines Coeli. London, 1684.Google Scholar
Geneva, Ann. Astrology and the Seventeenth Century Mind: William Lilly and the Language of the Stars. Manchester, 1995.Google Scholar
Gray, Walter. An almanacke and prognostication. London, 1589.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. D. A. Maps in Tudor England. Chicago, 1993.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
Hopton, Arthur. An Almanack and Prognostication. London, 1606.Google Scholar
Hopton, Arthur. Concordancy of Yeares. London, 1612.Google Scholar
Ingpen, William. The Secrets of Numbers. London, 1624.Google Scholar
Jeake, Samuel. An Astrological Diary of the Seventeenth Century: Samuel Jeake of Rye, 1652–1699. Eds. Michael Hunter and Annabel Gregory. Oxford, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Anthony. The Estrangement of the Past: A Study in the Origins of Modern Historical Consciousness. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Kidman, Thomas. A new Almanack for the yeare of our redemption 1633. Cambridge, 1633.Google Scholar
Knappen, M. M., ed. Two Elizabethan Puritan Diaries. Chicago, 1933.Google Scholar
Lilly, William. Anglicus: or, An ephemeris. London, 1646.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Michael. Mystical Bedlam: Madness, Anxiety, and Healing in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
Manning, Bernard. The People’s Faith in the Time of Wyclif. Cambridge, 1919.Google Scholar
Maus, Katherine Eisaman. Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar
McCoy, Richard. Alterations of State: Sacred Kingship in the English Reformation. New York, 2002.10.7312/mcco12616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Melton, John. Astrologaster, or the Figure Caster. London, 1620.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas. No Wit, No Help Like a Woman’s. Ed. Lowell E. Johnson. Lincoln, 1976.Google Scholar
Milton, John. On Christian Doctrine. In The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, ed. D. M. Wolfe, 8 vols. New Haven, 1973.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Lost. In The Riverside Milton, ed. Roy Flannagan, 297–710. Boston, 1998a.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Regain’d. In The Riverside Milton, ed. Roy Flannagan, 711–82. Boston, 1998b.Google Scholar
Monipennie, John. A Christian Almanacke. London, 1612.Google Scholar
Nicholas H, Nelson. “Astrology, Hudibras, and the Puritans.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 ( 1976 ): 521 – 36.Google Scholar
Newman, William R., and Anthony Grafton, eds. Secrets of Nature: Astrology and Alchemy in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
Orlin, Lena Cowen. Private Matters and Public Culture in Post-Reformation England. Ithaca, 1994.Google Scholar
Frank, Palmeri. “History, Nation and the Satiric Almanac, 1660–1760.” Criticism 40 ( 1998 ): 377 – 408 Google Scholar
Perkins, Maureen. Visions of the Future: Almanacs, Time, and Cultural Change 1775–1870. Oxford, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomer, H. R. “A Catalogue of English Almanacs of the Sixteenth Century, with Bibliographical Notes.” Notes and Queries, 6th ser., 11 (1885): 221–22, 262–64, 301–02, 382–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomian, Krzysztof. “Astrology as a Naturalistic Theology of History.” In ’Astrologi hallucinati’: Stars and the End of the World in Luther’s Time, ed. Paola Zambelli, 29–43. New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Anne Lake, Prescott. “Getting a Record: Stubbs, Singleton, and a 1579 Almanac.” Sidney Journal 21 ( 2003 ): 51 – 57 Google Scholar
Prescott, Anne Lake. “Refusing Translation: The Gregorian Calendar and Early Modern English Writers.” Yearbook of English Studies 36 (2006): 112–22.Google Scholar
Pynson, Richard. The Kalender of Shepherdes. 1506. Reprint. Ed. H. O. Sommer. London, 1892.Google Scholar
Ribadeneyra, Pedro de. The lives of saints vvith other fests of the year according to the Roman calendar written in Spanish by the Reverend Father Peter Ribadeneyra. St. Omer, 1669.Google Scholar
Harry, Rusche. “Prophecies and Propaganda, 1641–1651.” The English Historical Review 84 ( 1969 ): 752 - 70Google Scholar
Rusche, Harry. “A Reading of John Milton’s Horoscope.” Milton Quarterly 13 (1979): 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Harold Jenkins. London, 1982.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare Based on the Oxford Edition. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katherine Eisaman Maus. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Smyth, Adam. “Almanacs, Annotators, and Life-Writing in Early Modern England.” English Literary Renaissance, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sommerville, C. John. The Secularization of Early Modern England: From Religious Culture to Religious Faith. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. Ithaca, 1988.Google Scholar
Stubbings, Frank. “A Cambridge Pocket-Diary, 1587–1592.” Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society 5 (1971): 191–202.Google Scholar
Swallow, Thomas. An Almanack. Cambridge, 1639.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. 8 vols. New York, 1923–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Brian, ed. Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villegas, Alonso de. The liues of saints. Written in Spanish by the learned and reuerend father, Alfonso Villegas, diuine, of the order of Saint Dominick. Trans. J. Heigham. St. Omer, 1621.Google Scholar
Alexandra, Walsham. “Frantick Hacket: Prophecy, Sorcery, Insanity and the Elizabethan Puritan Movement.” The Historical Journal 41 ( 1998 ): 27 – 66 Google Scholar
Watkins, Richard, and James Robertes. A doble almanacke or kalender drawne for this present yeere, 1600. London, 1600.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles. The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine, and Reform, 1626–1660. New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Webster, John. Academiarum Examen, or the Examination of Academies. London, 1654.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Donald J. The Measure of Times Past: Pre-Newtonian Chronologies and the Rhetoric of Relative Time. Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, William. An almanacke and prognostication for the yeare of our redemption MDCII. London, 1602.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th November 2018 - 4th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

8 Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Marking Time: Astrology, Almanacs, and English Protestantism*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Marking Time: Astrology, Almanacs, and English Protestantism*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Marking Time: Astrology, Almanacs, and English Protestantism*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *