Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:12:28.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wage Interdependence and Competitiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

David de la Croix
David de la Croix*
Affiliation:
FNRS and UCL
Get access

Summary

We build a multi-sector model with wage bargaining and imperfect competition to analyse the links between wage interdependence and competitiveness. Quantity constraints together with union power, firm market power and wage externalities play a significant role in the determination of competitiveness and in the transmission of shocks among sectors. This is verified by an empirical study on Belgian data. We identify leading sectors in wage formation and evaluate the effect of sector-specific shocks on the competitiveness of the other sectors.

Résumé

Résumé

On présente un modéle multi-sectoriel avec concurrence imparfaite et négociation collective dans le but d'analyser les liens entre interdépendance des salaires et compétitivité. Les contraintes quantitatives ainsi que le pouvoir des syndicats et des firmes et les externalités salariales jouent un rôle important dans la transmission intersectorielle des chocs et done déterminent la compétitivité des secteurs. Ceci est vérifié dans une etude empirique sur données beiges. Nous identifions les secteurs « leaders » en matiére de négociation collective et évaluons l'effet des chocs sectoriels sur la compétitivité des autres secteurs.

Keywords

432831432831
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , 1993 , pp. 395 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is part of the SPES programme E/89400153/PRO. I am grateful to Torben Andersen, Philippe Devillé, Jacques Drèze, Horst Entorf, Henri Sneessens and to the participants to the CEREC Seminar (St Louis, Brussels), IRES Seminar (UCL) and SPES meeting in Marseille for helpful comments. The text benefited also from detailed comments by two anonymous referees. Paul Olbrechts (IRES) kindly provided the statistical material.

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, T. [1991], Demand Management Towards Internal and External Balance in an Open Economy with Centralized Wage Settings, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 57, pp. 361–378.Google Scholar
Arnsperger, C. and de la Croix, D. [1993], Bargaining and Equilibrium Unemployment: Narrowing the Gap Between New Keynesian and Disequilibrium Theories, European Journal of Political Economy, 9, pp. 163–190.Google Scholar
Aukrust, O., [1977], Inflation in the Open Economy: A Norwegian Model, in Krause, L. and Salant, W., eds, Worldwide inflation, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Bean, C., Bernholz, P., Danthine, J-P., Malinvaud, E. [1990], European Labour Markets: a Long-run View, CEPS Paper 46.Google Scholar
Bhaksar, V. [1990], Wage Relativities and the Natural Range of Unemployment, The Economic Journal, 100, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Klyotaki, N. [1987], Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand, American Economic Review, 77, pp. 647–666.Google Scholar
Bogaert, H., de Blolley, T. and Verlinden, J. [1991], L'ajustement des Sajaires Face aux Chocs Pétroliers et les Réponses de la Politique Economique, IRES Discussion Paper 91, Universityé Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. and Driffill, J. [1988], Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance, Economic Policy, 6, pp. 16–61.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Perron, P. [1991], Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots, NBER technical working paper 100, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. and John, A. [1988], Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, pp. 441–463.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J. [1977], Monopolistic Competition and Optimum product Diversity, American Economic Review, 67, pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
de la Croix, , [1993], Externalities in Wage Formation and Structural Unemployment, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Dowrick, S. [1989], Union-Oligopoly Bargaining, Economic Journal, 99, pp. 1123–1142.Google Scholar
Dréze, J. and Bean, C. [1990], European Unemployment: Lessons from a MultiCountry Econometric Exercise, in Drèze, J. et al., Europe's Unemployment Problem, MITPress.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. and Fender, J. [1987], Bargaining and Wage Resistence in an Open Macroeconomic Model, Economic Journal, 97, pp. 106–120.Google Scholar
Engle, R. and Granger, C. [1987], Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica 55, pp. 251–276.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Hof, F. [1990], The effect of Union Power on the Multipliers of a Small Open Economy with Centralized Bargaining, Paper presented at the fifth EEA Congress, Lisbon, 1990.Google Scholar
Gylfason, T. and Lindbeck, A. [1984b], Competing Wage Claims, Cost Inflation, and Capacity Utilization, European Economic Review, 24, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, H. and Schultz, C. [1990], A General Equilibrium Macro Model with Wage Bargaining, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 92, pp. 379–398.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. [1991], Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59, pp. 1551–1580.Google Scholar
Kaskarelis, I. [1989], Output Fluctuations in the Group of Five Economies, DP Birbeck College, London.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. [1936], The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Lambert, J.-P. [1988], Disequilibrium Macroeconomic Models, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Licandro, O. [1991], Monopolistic Competition and Aggregation over Micro-markets in Disequilibrium, mimeo, Carlos III, Madrid.Google Scholar
Licandro, O. [1992], Investment Dynamics and Capacity Utilization in Monopolistic Competition, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 27, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, E. [1977], The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. and Solow, R. [1981], Wage Bargaining and Employment, American Economic Review, 71, pp. 898–908.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. [1990], Critical Values for Cointegration Tests, UCSD Discussion Paper 90–4.Google Scholar
Mehta, F. and Sneessens, H. [1990], Belgian Unemployment: The Story of a Small Open Economy Caught in a Worldwide Recession, in Dreèze, J. et al., Europe's Unemployment Problem, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Neary, P. [1990], Neo-Keynesian Macroeconomics in an Open Economy, in Advanced Lectures in Quantitative Economics.Google Scholar
Nymoen, R. [1991], A Small Linear Model of Wage and Price Inflation in the Norwegian Economy, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6, pp. 255–269.Google Scholar
Perron, P. [1989], The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, 57, pp. 1361–1401.Google Scholar
Rama, M. [1990], Wage Bargaining and Economic Performance in the Open Economy, mimeo, Centro de Investigaciones Economicas, Montevideo.Google Scholar
Sneessens, H. [1987], Investment and the Inflation-Unemployment Trade off in a Macroeconomic Rationing Model with Monopolistic Competition, European Economic Review, 31, pp. 781–815.Google Scholar