Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T14:29:02.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Réglementation des négociations collectives, chômage et croissance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Pierre Cahuc
Pierre Cahuc*
Affiliation:
Université Paris I, MAD
Get access

Résumé

Cet article analyse l'impact de la réglementation des négociations collectives sur le chômage et la croissance dans un modèle à générations imbriquées avec concurrence imparfaite. La réglementation est appréhendée à partir de deux critères : le type de variable devant être négocié (salaire, emploi, coefficient de partage du profit, investissement) et la possibilité de renégocier les conventions collectives à des dates non déterminées préalablement. L'aménagement de la possibilité de renégocier à des dates non fixées entraîne toujours une augmentation du chômage et une diminution de la croissance. Augmenter le nombre de variables négociables induit un accroissement du chômage, mais peut avoir des conséquences positives sur la croissance.

Summary

Summary

In this paper are studied the consequences of different wage bargaining rules on employment and growth in an overlapping generations model with imperfect competition. The rules are defined by two characteristics: the type of variable that must be negotiated (wage, employment, profit-share, investment), and the possibility or the impossibility to renegotiate the contracts at any date. Renegotiations raise the unemployment rate and decrease the growth rate. An increase in the number of variables that must be negotiated always increases the unemployment rate, but may have positive effects on the growth rate.

Keywords

820830832820830832
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 163 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

Sans engager leur responsabilité, je remercie Pierre Granier, Bertrand Wi-gniolle et André Zylberberg ainsi que deux rapporteurs des Recherches Economiques de Louvain pour leurs remarques.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Allais, M. [1947], Economie et intérêt, Paris, Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. et Deveureux, M. [1988], Trade Unions and the Choice of Capital Stock, Scandinavian Journal of Economies, vol. 90(1), pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. [1962], The Economie Implication of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 80, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar
Barro., R. J. et Sala-ì Martin, X. [1992], Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 59(4), pp. 689–703.Google Scholar
Binmore, K.G., Rubinstein, A. et Wolinsky, A. [1986], The Nash solution in Economic Modelling, Rand Journal of Economics, 17(2), pp. 176–188.Google Scholar
Cahuc, P. et El Ferktaji, R. [1993], Partage du profit, chômage et croissance, Cahiers Eco et Maths, 9, 3-07 (Université de Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne).Google Scholar
Devereux, B. et Lockwood, B. [1991], Trade Unions, non Binding Wage Agreements, and Capital Accumulation, European Economic Review, vol.35, pp. 1411–1426.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. [1965], National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model, American Economic Review, vol. 55, pp. 1126–1150.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. et Stiglitz, J.E. [1977], Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity, American Economic Review, vol. 67(3), pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. et Helpman, E. H. [1991], Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge et Londres, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grout, P. A. [1984], Investment And Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts, Econometrica, vol. 52, pp. 449—460.Google Scholar
JacobsenH., J. H., J. et Schultz, C. [1990], A General Equilibrium Macro Model with Wage Bargaining, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 92(3), pp. 379–398.Google Scholar
Layard, R. et Nickell, S. J. [1990], Is Unemployment Lower if Unions Bargain over Employment?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 55, pp. 773–787.Google Scholar
Layard, R., Nickell, S.J. et Jackman, R. [1991], Unemployment, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, A. [1991], The Determinants of Wage Pressure: Some Implications of a Dynamic Model, Economica, vol. 58, pp. 325–339.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, I.M. et Solow, R.M. [1981], Wage bargaining and employment, American Economic Review, vol. 71(5), pp. 896–908.Google Scholar
Nash, J. [1953], Two-Person Cooperative Game, Econometrica, vol. 21(1), pp. 128–140.Google Scholar
Nickell, S.J. et Andrews, M. [1983], Unions, Real Wage and Employment in Britain 1951-79, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 35, Supplement, pp. 183–206.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. J. [1985], The Economic Theory of Trade Union: An Introductory Survey, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 87(2), pp. 160–193.Google Scholar
Pagano, M. [1990], Imperfect Competition, Underemployment Equilibria and Fiscal Policy, The Economic Journal, vol. 100, pp. 440–463.Google Scholar
Pissarides, C.A. [1990], Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pojhola, M. [1987], Profit-Sharing, Collective Bargaining and Employment, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 143(2), pp. 334–342.Google Scholar
Romer, P. [1989], Capital Accumulation in the Theory of Long-Run Growth, dans, R. Barro (éd.), Modern Business Cyle Theory, UK, Basil Blackwell et USA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, E. [1987], Trade Unions, Investment, and Employment: A non Cooperative Approach, European Economic Review, vol. 31, pp. 1465–1492 Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. [1987], Steady State Unemployment under Profit-Sharing, Economic Journal, vol. 97, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar