Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:13:18.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking down the distance barriers

perceptions and practice in technology-mediated distance language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Matthew Fox
Matthew Fox
Affiliation:
Southampton Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Has the time come to re-evaluate the role of the teacher in technology-enhanced language learning (TELL)? Studies into Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) and TELL have tended to focus on issues relating to learner/computer interaction or learner/learner interaction mediated via the computer (eg Warschauer 1996: 7–26). Relatively little research has been undertaken to try and understand how technology can best be used for language acquisition (cf. Matthews 1994: 35–401a or Zähner 1995: 34–481b) particularly at a distance, to improve both the effectiveness of the learning and the learner's enjoyment of it. Indeed those studies which have been undertaken have tended to be inconclusive (cf. Pedersen 1987). This paper attempts to begin to redress the balance by focusing on teaching and learning issues related to technology mediated distance language acquisition, with particular emphasis on the role of the teacher. The findings in this paper are based on the pilot phase of the Language Learning Network, a project to design, deliver and evaluate a technology mediated-vocational distance language course. With distance learning, as with classroom-based courses, communication with and support from the tutor is considered paramount. The project has established models for regular synchronous and asynchronous contact with tutors, provided in the context of time and budgetary constraints. Having validated the courses for accreditation and wider distribution on a commercial and part-time studies basis, much attention has been paid to the questions of learner support, assessment and quality assurance.

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 59 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd-Barret, o. and Scanlon, E. (eds.) (1991) Computers and Learning, Wokingham: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1984) Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, D. J (1982) Introduction to ‘The selection and Training of helpers’. In Cousin, W. (ed.). Report of the Workshops in the Role and Training of Helpers for Self-Access Learning Systems, Moray House (mimeo).Google Scholar
Dickinson, L. (1987) Self-Instruction in Language Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (1997) ‘Beyond the Technocentric – Developing and Evaluating Content-driven. Internetbased Language Courses’. In Borchardt, F., Johnson, E. and Rhodes, L. (eds.). Proceedings of the Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (1997) Annual Symposium “Content! Content! Content!”, Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Harasim, L. (ed.) (1990) On-line Education: Perspectives on a New Environment. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kohn, K. (1995) ‘Perspectives on Computer Assisted Language Learning’, ReCALL 7(2), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, J. (no date) A Consideration of a Self-Access Approach to the Learning of English, The British Council (mimeo).Google Scholar
Mason, R. and Kaye, A. (1989) Mindweave, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, C. (1994) ‘Integrating CALL into ‘strong’ research agendas’. Computers & Education 23 (1&2). 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oiler, J. jr. (1996) ‘Toward a Theory of Technologically Assisted Language Learning/Instruction’, CALICO Journal 13 (4). 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noijons, J. (1987) ‘Testing in Multimedia Language Courses: Function, Format and Flexibility’, presentation at CALICO 97. New York, West Point.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1992) Research Methods in Language Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. (1987) ‘Research on CALL’. In Flint, Smith W. (ed.), Modem Media in Foreign Language Education: Theory and Implementation, Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (1996) ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Development of Pedagogical Tasks in Computer Mediated Communication’, CALICO Journal 14 (1), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, A. (1995) ‘Issues in Distance Teaching in Languages’, ReCALL 7(1), 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996) ‘Comparing Face to Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom’, CAUCO Journal 13(2/3), 7–26.Google Scholar
White, L. (1987) ‘Markedness and Second Language Acquisition: the Question of Transfer’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition (9), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham-McClain, L. and Earnest-Youngs, B. (1997) ‘An Empirical Study of Computer-Assisted Language Learning in a Second-Semester French Course. An Empirical Study of TELL in Elementary College French’, presentation at CALICO 97, New York, West Point.Google Scholar
Zähner, C. (1995) ‘Second Language Acquisition and the computer: variation in second language acquisition’, ReCALL 7 (1), 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar