Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:22:07.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HEAVENLY AND EARTHLY ELEMENTS IN MANILIUS' ASTRONOMICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2014

Dunstan Lowe
Dunstan Lowe*
Affiliation:
University of Kentd.m.lowe@kent.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

Mud and stars make a strange mixture, yet here in brief is Manilius' universe, in which the rarefied heavens regulate the coarse earth. As shown by the recent spate of critical attention to the Astronomica, his various intellectual resources—astronomical calculation, mythology, astrological lore and Stoic physics—, while not forming a unified dogma, are less muddled than previously thought. He switches between these different discourses (or as it were, idioms) in pursuit of his own cherished goal: an optimistic eulogy to a fatalistic cosmos in which the study of the heavens holds supreme interest and value. Manilius' discipline is the most specialised and mathematical, as well as the most novel, of all Roman didactic poets. He therefore takes a decidedly concrete approach to the inevitable balancing act between technical content and poetic form, as is immediately obvious in his self-portrait as a priest-poet uates tending the twin altar-fires of poem and subject (carminis et rerum, 1.22). The proposal of this paper will be that the division between poetic and technical corresponds far more profoundly with Manilius' dualistic universe (mundus), in which the realm of the hierophantic astronomer and natural philosopher is the sky (caelum) and that of the mythological poet is the earth (terra). Likewise, the constellations are both cosmic stars (stellae) and mythic signs (signa). Because the cosmos is a dynamic system, terrestrial inconstancy—violence, mortality and mess of all kinds—interferes with the absolute constancy of the celestial clockwork. The paradigm for such interference is catasterism, the translation of something mortal into stars. It turns the constellations into duck-rabbits: from one perspective they are eternal parts in the machinery of fate; from the other, vestiges of mortal beings or objects, which are often of dubious and even monstrous provenance. In this article I propose that Manilius' fundamental view is that the stars represent order and the earth chaos, a conviction partly expressed through Stoic doctrine and partly through poetic tropes. He frequently uses the imagery of the four elements to divide the superior realm of air and fire from the inferior realm of water and earth. Significant themes contributing towards this include Gigantomachy, cosmic vapours, the planets, and the figure of the Whale (Cetus) in the Andromeda story near the close of the poem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , June 2014 , pp. 45 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abry, J.-H. (2006), ‘ Sed caelo noscenda canam… (Astr. 2, 142): Poésie et astrologie dans les Astronomiques de Manilius’, in Cusset, C. (ed.), Musa docta: Recherches sur la poésie scientifique dans l'Antiquité (Saint-Étienne), 293-334.Google Scholar
Abry, J.-H. (2007), ‘Manilius and Aratus: Two Stoic Poets on Stars’, LICS 6.1, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/, accessed 16 June 2012.Google Scholar
Abry, J.-H. (2008), ‘Les vers 5, 710-745 sont-ils l'épilogue des Astronomiques?’, in Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C. (eds.), Commencer et finir: débuts et fins dans les littératures grecque, latine et néolatine (Paris), 653-68.Google Scholar
Abry, J.-H. (2011a), ‘Cosmos and Imperium: Politicized Digressions in Manilius' Astronomica’, in Green and Volk (2011), 222-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abry, J.-H. (2011b), ‘La place des Astronomiques de Manilius dans la poésie astrologique de l'antiquité’, in Boehm, I. (ed.), La poésie astrologique dans l'antiquité (Lyons), 95-114.Google Scholar
Bajoni, M.G. (2004), ‘Gli Astronomica di Manilio come rappresentazione politica dello spazio celeste’, Latomus 63, 98-107.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1987), ‘Dating Manilius' Astronomica ’, Maia 39, 101-03.Google Scholar
Barton, T.S. (1994), Ancient Astrology (London).Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (2007), ‘Situating Nature's Wonders in Pliny's Natural History ’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), Vita Vigilia Est: Papers in Honour of Barbara Levick (London), 19-40.Google Scholar
Beretta, M., and Citti, F. (eds.) (2008), Lucrezio, la natura e la scienza (Florence).Google Scholar
Caldini Montanari, R. (1989), ‘Manilio tra scienza e filosofia: la dottrina delle comete’, Prometheus 15, 1-30.Google Scholar
Coleman, K.M. (1983), ‘Manilius' Monster’, Hermes 111, 226-32.Google Scholar
Cuny-Le Callet, B. (2005), Rome et ses monstres Tome 1: Naissance d'un concept philosophique et rhétorique (Grenoble).Google Scholar
Di Pasquale, G. (2008), ‘Il concetto di machina mundi in Lucrezio’, in Beretta and Citti (2008), 35-50.Google Scholar
Dicks, D.R. (1970), Early Greek Astronomy to Aristotle (London).Google Scholar
Domenicucci, P. (1993), ‘Il tema del catasterismo negli Astronomica di Manilio’, in Liuzzi (1993), 211-29.Google Scholar
Evans, J. (1998), The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (2011), ‘More Sentiment Than Science: Roman Stargazing Before and After Manilius’, in Green and Volk (2011), 13-31.Google Scholar
Gale, M.R. (2011), ‘Digressions, Intertextuality, and Ideology in Didactic Poetry: The Case of Manilius’, in Green and Volk (2011), 205-21.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2000), Ovid, Aratus and Augustus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Goold, G.P. (ed. and tr.) (1977), Manilius: Astronomica (Cambridge MA/London).Google Scholar
Green, S.J. (2011), ‘Arduum ad astra: The Poetics and Politics of Horoscopic Failure in Manilius' Astronomica’, in Green and Volk (2011), 120-38.Google Scholar
Green, S.J. and Volk, K. (eds.) (2011), Forgotten Stars: Manilius and his Intellectual Background (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. (2007), ‘Probing the Entrails of the Universe: Astrology as Bodily Knowledge in Manilius' Astronomica ’, In König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire (Cambridge), 229-40.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (2011), ‘Manilius' Conflicted Stoicism’, in Green and Volk (2011), 32-44.Google Scholar
Hardie, P.R. (1995), ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos’, CQ 45, 204-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P.R. (2008), ‘Lucretian Multiple Explanations and their Reception in Latin Didactic and Epic’, in Beretta and Citti (2008), 69-96.Google Scholar
Hardie, P.R. (2009), Lucretian Receptions: History, The Sublime, Knowledge (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2007), The Medieval World of Isidore of Seville: Truth from Words (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2011), ‘Watch This Space (Getting Round 1.215-46)’, in Green and Volk (2011), 59-84.Google Scholar
Hill, D.E. (ed. and tr.) (1985), Ovid: Metamorphoses I-IV (Warminster).Google Scholar
Holmes, N. (1998), ‘Lucan 7.425: Planets or Stars?’, Mnemosyne 51, 446-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housman, A.E. (1903), M. Manilius: Astronomicon Liber Primus (London).Google Scholar
Housman, A.E. (1913), ‘Manilius, Augustus, Tiberius, Capricornius and Libra’, CQ 7, 109-14.Google Scholar
Housman, A.E. (1916), M. Manilius: Astronomicon Liber Tertius (London).Google Scholar
Housman, A.E. (1920), M. Manilius: Astronomicon Liber Quartus (London).Google Scholar
Hübner, W. (1984), ‘Manilius als Astrologe und Dichter’, ANRW II.32, 126-320.Google Scholar
Hübner, W. (2003), ‘L'Astrométéorologie dans l'antiquité classique’, in Cusset, C. (ed.), La météorologie dans l'antiquité: entre science et croyance (Saint-Etienne), 75-86.Google Scholar
Hübner, W. (2006), ‘ Vir gregis: imitations structurelles de Virgile dans les Astronomica de Manilius’, Pallas 72, 137-48.Google Scholar
Hübner, W. (ed., tr. and comm.) (2010), Manilius: Astronomica Buch V (2 vols.: Berlin).Google Scholar
Hübner, W. (2011), ‘Tropes and Figures: Manilian Style as a Reflection of Astrological Tradition’, in Green and Volk (2011), 141-64.Google Scholar
Hunter, R.L. (1995), ‘Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in Aratus' Phaenomena ’, Arachnion 2, 1-34.Google Scholar
Jastrow, J. (1899), ‘The Mind's Eye’, Popular Science Monthly 54, 299-312.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2003), ‘The Stoics and the Astronomical Sciences’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics (Cambridge), 328-44.Google Scholar
Jones, F. (1984), ‘A Note on Manilius 5.604’, AClass 27, 139.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. (2011), ‘Sums in Verse or a Mathematical Aesthetic?’, in Green and Volk (2011), 165-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1990), ‘ Numquam futtilibus excanduit ignibus aether (Man. Astr. 1.876): comete, pesti e guerre civili’, SIFC 8, 231-49.Google Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1991), ‘Manilio e la gerarchia delle stelle (Astr. V 734-745)’, Prometheus 17, 247-58.Google Scholar
Langbridge, F. (1896), A Cluster of Quiet Thoughts (London).Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. (1979), ‘Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution’, Hermes 107, 344-70.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2011), ‘Myth and Explanation in Manilius’, in Green and Volk (2011), 45-56.Google Scholar
Liuzzi, D. (ed.) (1993), Manilio fra poesia e scienza (Galatina).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1966), Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1970), Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle (London).Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D. (tr. and comm.) (1987), The Hellenistic Philosophers Vol. 1 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lowe, D. (2004), ‘Monsters in the Roman Sky’, in Yoder, P.L. and Kreuter, P.M. (eds.), Monsters and the Monstrous: Myths and Metaphors of Enduring Evil (Oxford), 143-54.Google Scholar
Luck, G. (1984), ‘A Stoic Cosmogony in Manilius (1.149-172)’, in Lucchesi, E. and Saffrey, H.D. (eds.), Mémorial André-Jean Festugiére: antiquité païenne et chrétienne (Geneva), 27-32.Google Scholar
Lühr, F.F. (1973), ‘Kometen und Pest: Exegetisches zu Manilius 1.874-895’, WS 86, 113-25.Google Scholar
MacGregor, A. (2005), ‘Was Manilius Really a Stoic?’, ICS 30, 41-65.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. (2011), ‘On Two Stoic Paradoxes in Manilius’, in Green and Volk (2011), 85-103.Google Scholar
Maranini, A. (1994), Filologia fantastica: Manilio e suoi ‘Astronomica’ (Bologna).Google Scholar
Martin, C. (1985), ‘A Reconsideration of Ovid's Fasti ’, ICS 10, 261-74.Google Scholar
Montanari, R.C. (1993), ‘Le constellazione in Manilio, ovvero l'imperfezione perfetta’, in Liuzzi (1993), 55-78.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. (1994), ‘Narrative Techniques in Manilius, Astronomica 5.538-618’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VII (Brussels), 416-29.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2008), Perseus (New York).Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2012), ‘Pseudepígrafos de la astrología griega’, in Martínez, Javier (ed.), Mundus vult decipi: estudios interdisciplinares sobre falsificación textual y literaria (Madrid), 269-82.Google Scholar
Poochigian, A. (ed., tr. and comm.) (2010), Aratus: Phaenomena (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. (2007), ‘Lucretius and the Sublime’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.R. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (Cambridge), 167-84.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. (1994), Marriage to Death: The Conflation of Wedding and Funeral Rituals in Greek Tragedy (Princeton).Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T.G. (1989), Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Salemme, C. (2000), Introduzione agli “Astronomica” di Manilio (Naples).Google Scholar
Salles, R. (2005), ‘ Ekpyrosis and the Goodness of God in Cleanthes’, Phronesis 50, 56-78.Google Scholar
Schwarz, W. (1972), ‘ Praecordia mundi: zur Grundlegung der Bedeutung des Zodiak bei Manilius’, Hermes 100, 601-14.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1984), ‘Senecan Baroque: The Death of Hippolytus in Seneca, Ovid, and Euripides’, TAPA 114, 311-25.Google Scholar
Taub, L. (2012), ‘Physiological Analogies and Metaphors in Explanations of the Earth and the Cosmos’, in Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C. (eds.), Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe (Leiden), 41-63.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. (2010), ‘ Fallentia Sidera: The Failure of Astronomical Escapism in Lucan’, AJP 131, 635-61.Google Scholar
Uden, J. (2011), ‘A Song from the Universal Chorus: The Perseus and Andromeda Epyllion’, in Green and Volk (2011), 235-52.Google Scholar
Van Der Horst, P.W. (ed., tr. and comm.) (1984), Chaeremon, Egyptian Priest and Stoic Philosopher (Leiden).Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2001), ‘Pious and Impious Approaches to Cosmology in Manilius’, MD 47, 85-117.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002), The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius (Oxford).Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2003), ‘Manilius' Solitary Chariot-ride (Astronomica 2.138-40)’, CQ 53, 628-33.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2009), Manilius and his Intellectual Background (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2011), ‘Manilian Self-Contradiction’, in Green and Volk (2011), 104-19.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2012), ‘Letters in the Sky: Reading the Signs in Aratus’ Phaenomena ’, AJP 133, 209-40.Google Scholar
von Blanckenhagen, P.H. (1987), ‘Easy Monsters’, in Farkas, A.E., Harper, P.O. and Harrison, E.B. (eds.), Monsters and Demons in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds: Papers Presented in Honor of Edith Porada (Mainz on Rhine), 85-94.Google Scholar
Voss, B.R. (1972), ‘Die Andromeda-Episode des Manilius’, Hermes 100, 413-34.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.M. (1986), ‘The Prologue to Manilius I’, PLLS 5, 283-98.Google Scholar
Wright, M.R. (1995), Cosmology in Antiquity (London).Google Scholar