Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Planning sensor locations for the detection of radioactive plumes for Norway and the Balkans*

  • J. Barescut, D. Lariviere, T. Stocki, K.B. Helle (a1), L. Urso (a2), P. Astrup (a3), T. Mikkelsen (a3), J.C. Kaiser (a2), E. Pebesma (a1), C. Rojas-Palma (a4), E. Holo (a5), J.E. Dyve (a5) and W. Raskob (a6)...

Abstract

Locations of gamma dose rate sensors have often been chosen by administrative or geometrical criteria. Nowadays computational capacity allows for a more realistic basis. We use simulations of potential radioactive plumes based on weather data of one year to investigate the threats to regions without own nuclear power plants and to find good numbers and locations of sensors to detect such plumes. We optimise sensor locations by minimising a cost function that can take into account numbers of undetected plumes, their dose to the region in general, or on the population. Besides we assess the effect of administrative constraints, be it that sensors have to cover administrative units, or that optimisation is done for sub-regions separately. Finally we evaluate the robustness of the approach if less or other plumes are used. The main findings are that sensors at boundaries are often best, but also typical paths of plumes may be important, and that administrative constraints may necessitate much more sensors. The small numbers of sensors actually deployed in these regions seem sufficient. However, the latter may be an artefact of the low number of plumes we considered. Altogether, combined with other considerations, this approach can contribute to better decisions about gamma dose rate sensor locations.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
[1][1]Melles S.J., Heuvelink G.B.M., Twenhöfel C.J.W., van Dijk A., Hiemstra P.H., Baume O., Stöhlker U. “Optimizing the spatial pattern of networks for monitoring radioactive releases”, Computers & Geosciences 37 (2011) 280-288.
[2][2]Helle K.B., Pebesma E. “Conservative updating of sampling designs”. Accuracy 2010, Leicester, UK, N.J. Tate, P.F. Fisher. pp. 181-184.
[3][3]Mikkelsen T., Thykier-Nielsen S., Hoe S., “Medium-range puff growth”, Developments in Environmental Science 6 (2007) 243-252.
[4][4]Mikkelsen T., Larsen S., Thykier-Nielsen S., “Description of the Risø puff diffusion model”, Nuclear Technology 67 (1984) 56-65.
[5][5]WRF. http://www.wrf-model.org/index.php [2011.05.01]
[6][6]Kalnay E., Kanamitsu M., Kistler R., Collins W., Deaven D., Gandin L., Iredell M., Saha S., White G., Woollen J., Zhu Y., Chelliah M., Ebisuzaki W., Higgins W., Janowiak J., Mo K., Ropelewski C., Wang J., Leetmaa A., Reynolds R., Jenne R., Joseph D. “The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project”, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 77 (3) (1996) 437-471.
[7][7]NOAA. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/ [2011.05.01]
[8][8]R Development Core Team (2011). “R: a language and environment for statistical computing”, http://www.R-project.org/[2011.05.01]
[9][9]Statistisk Sentralbyrå (2010). “Kart over tettsteder 2009”, http://www.ssb.no/beftett/ [2011.05.01]

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed