Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:28:00.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The IRSN’s earliest assessments of the Fukushima accident's consequences for the terrestrial environmentin Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 2011 the IRSN conducted several assessments of atmospheric radioactive releases due to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident (March 11, 2011) and of their impact on Japan’s terrestrial environment. They were based on the IRSN’s emergency management tools and on the abundant information and technical data gradually published in Japan. According to these assessments, the main release phase lasted from March 12 to 25, 2011 and impacted Japanese land in two events, the first on 15 and 16 March, in which the main radioactive deposits were formed, and the second from March 20 to 23, which was less significant. The highest amounts of radioactive deposits were found in an area extending upwards of several tens of kilometers northwest of the plant. Lower amounts were discontinuously scattered in an area extending up to over 250 km away. Initially composed mainly of short-lived radionuclides, the deposits’ activity sharply decreased in the subsequent weeks. Since the summer of 2011, cesium-134 and cesium-137 have become the residual deposits’ main components. According to IRSN estimates, in the absence of protection, the doses due to exposure to the radioactive plume during the atmospheric release phase may have been potentially higher for people who remained in coastal areas up to several tens of kilometers north and south of the damaged plant. Thereafter, people living up to 50 km northwest of the plant, outside the 20-km emergency evacuation zone, were potentially most vulnerable to residual radioactive deposits over time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2013

References

REFERENCES

ASN (2012) Éléments de doctrine pour la gestion post-accidentelle d’un accident nucléaire – Version finale du 5 octobre 2012. Comité Directeur pour la gestion de la phase post-accidentelle d’un accident nucléaire (CODIRPA) (http://www.asn.fr/index.php/Bas-de-page/Sujet-Connexes/Gestion-post-accidentelle/Comite-directeur-gestion-de-phase-post-accidentelle/Elements-de-doctrine-pour-la-gestion-post-accidentelle-d-un-accident-nucleaire-5-octobre-2012 ).
Corbin D., Denis J. (2012) Évaluations des rejets atmosphériques associés à l’accident de Fukushima. Rapport IRSN/PSN-RES/SAG/2012-00347 (available upon request at http://www.irsn.fr/ EN/ Contact/ Pages/Question.aspx).
Gonze M.A., Simon-Cornu C., Métivier J.M., Garcia-Sanchez L., Mourlon C., Parache V. (2012) Landscape-level Model Predictions of 131I, 134Cs and 137Cs transfer through terrestrial systems in the 80-km Fukushima-Daiichi area using the Symbiose Platform. IRPA, May 2012, Glasgow (available on website irpa13glascow.com or http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Larecherche/publications-documentation/Publications_documentation/BDD_publi/DEI/Documents/IRPA13-IRSN-poster-M-A-Gonze-P12-23.pdf).
IAEA (2006) Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and to their remediation: twenty years off experiment. Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group ‘Environment’, International Atomic Energy Agency.
IRSN (2011) Première évaluation de la radioactivité rejetée par la centrale de Fukushima Dai-ichi jusqu’au 22 mars 2011. Note d’information IRSN.fr, 22 mars 2011 (irsn.fr or available upon request at http://www.irsn.fr/EN/Contact/Pages/Question.aspx)
Korsakissok I., Didier D., Mathieu A., Quélo D., Groell J., Quentric E., Tombette M., Benoit J.P., Saunier O. (2012) Evaluation of the atmospheric releases of the Fukushima accident and their consequences. Rapport IRSN/PRP-CRI/SESUC/2012-35 (available upon request at http://www.irsn.fr/EN/Contact/Pages/Question.aspx).
Mathieu A., Korsakissok I., Quélo D., Groëll J., Tombette M., Didier D., Quentric E., Saunier O., Benoît J.-P., Isnard O. (2011) Atmospheric Dispersion and Deposition of Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident, Elements 8 (3).
Métivier J.M, Baccou J., Gonze M.A., Durenne A. (2012) Combining kriging with non-systematic error and lognormal kriging for contamination mapping around Fukushima Daiichi. GeoEnv, September 2012, Valencia (Spain).
MEXT (2011a) Results of the Nuclide Analysis of Plutonium and Strontium by MEXT. MEXT Report, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Sciences and Technology – Japan, September 30, 2011 (http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/en/contents/5000/4167/24/1750_093014.pdf).
MEXT (2011b) Results of the Fourth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT. MEXT Report, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Sciences and Technology – Japan, December 16, 2011 (http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/en/contents/4000/3179/24/1270_1216.pdf).
NISA (2011) Regarding the Evaluation of the Conditions on Reactor Cores of Unit 1, 2 and 3 related to the Accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station, TEPCO, Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency.
Quélo, D.,Krysta, M.,Bocquet, M.,Isnard, O.,Minier, Y.,Sportisse, B. (2007) Validation of the Polyphemus platform on the ETEX, Chernobyl and Algeciras cases, Atmos. Environ. 41, 53005315.Google Scholar
Saunier O., Mathieu A., Didier D., Tombette M., Quélo D., Winiarek V., Bocquet M. (2012) Using gamma dose rate monitoring with inverse modeling techniques to estimate the atmospheric release of a nuclear power plant accident: application to the Fukushima case. Proc. Int. International Meeting on Severe Accident Assessment and Management: Lessons Learned from Fukushima Dai-ichi, San Diego, California, November 11–15, 2012, American Nuclear Society (2012).
Soulhac L. and Didier D. (2008) Projet pX, note de principe pX 1.0. Note technique IRSN/DEI/SESUC/08-39 (available upon request at http://www.irsn.fr/EN/Contact/Pages/ Question.aspx).