Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:57:14.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concentration ratios for chemical analogues of key nuclides for different vegetation types at the Olkiluoto site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

L. J. Aro
Affiliation:
Finnish Forest Research Institute, Parkano Research Unit, Kaironiementie 54, 39700 Parkano, Finland
A. T.K. Ikonen
Affiliation:
Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, 27160 Eurajoki, Finland
J. Helin
Affiliation:
Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, 27160 Eurajoki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Olkiluoto Island on the western coast of Finland has been selected as a repository site for spent nuclear fuel in Finland. This study aimed at identifying differences in concentration ratios (CR), and their distributions, for the elements analysed on soil and vegetation samples taken on the island (Al, B, Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Ni, P, S, Zn). Many of the elements can be considered to be chemically analogous to radionuclides that, potentially, can be released from the repository. Differences between the soil and vegetation in different tree age, tree species and site fertility classes typical of the forest ecosystems in Olkiluoto were investigated. Lognormal distributions were fitted to the different groupings of the CR data calculated on the basis of the results from 94 sampling plots. In most cases no significant differences were found between the different groupings for a specific element when the 95% confidence intervals were applied. According to the results based on real site data for CRs in forest ecosystems on Olkiluoto, it appears that the current CR-based approach to radionuclide modelling in forest ecosystems is problematic due to the large variation in parameter values and in their practical definition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Souza M.P., Lytle C.M., Mulholland M.M., Otte M.L. and Terry N. Plant Physiology 122 (2000) 1281–1288.
Tamminen P., Aro L. and Salemaa M. Posiva Working Report 78 (2007).
Miettinen N. and Haapanen R. Posiva Working Report 54 (2002).
Rautio P., Latvajärvi H., Jokela A. and Kangas-Korhonen P. Posiva Working Report 35 (2004).
Saramäki J. and Korhonen K.T. Posiva Working Report 39 (2005).
Avila R. SKB, Technical Report TR 06-08 (2006).
Ekström P.-A. and Broed R. Posiva Working Report 31 (2006).
Broed R. Posiva Working Report 108 (2007).
Broed R., Avila R., Bergström U., Hjerpe T. and Ikonen A.T.K. Posiva Working Report 109 (2007).
Kaunisto S., Aro L. and Rantavaara A. Environmental Pollution 117 (2002) 111–119.
Cajander A.K. Acta Forestalia Fennica 56(5) (1949) 1–71.