Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:01:03.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TESTING THE METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF RADIOCARBON CONTENT IN LIQUID FUELS IN THE GLIWICE RADIOCARBON AND MASS SPECTROMETRY LABORATORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2022

Jean Baptiste Baranyika Open the ORCID record for Jean Baptiste Baranyika [Opens in a new window] ,
Natalia Piotrowska Open the ORCID record for Natalia Piotrowska [Opens in a new window] ,
Marzena Kłusek Open the ORCID record for Marzena Kłusek [Opens in a new window] ,
Adam Michczyński  and
Jacek Pawlyta Open the ORCID record for Jacek Pawlyta [Opens in a new window]
Jean Baptiste Baranyika*
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Centre for Science and Education, Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Natalia Piotrowska
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Centre for Science and Education, Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Marzena Kłusek
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Centre for Science and Education, Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Adam Michczyński
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Centre for Science and Education, Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Jacek Pawlyta
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Centre for Science and Education, Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of General Geology and Geotourism, Krakow, Poland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jean.baptiste.baranyika@polsl.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Determining the biocomponents in liquid fuels using radiocarbon radioisotope (14C) dating requires sample preparation adaptations to the conditions of the Gliwice Radiocarbon and Mass Spectrometry Laboratory. Liquid scintillation counting (LSC), and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) were investigated using six samples, including one 14C-free fuel and modern hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO). For AMS, samples were prepared using tin capsules for liquids for EA combustion and graphitization in an AGE system. For LSC, liquid fuels were prepared by mixing with purified preheated sand and a benzene synthesis line. Benzene resublimation was also tested. IRMS measurements were also conducted for benzene to account for isotopic fractionation. Sample background measurements using both methods showed good performances by both AMS and LSC without resublimation. Comparable results were also obtained for HVO.

Keywords

AMScarbon isotopesliquid fuelsLSCradiocarbon
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 64 , Issue 6: 3rd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference Gliwice, Poland, July 5–9, 2021 , December 2022 , pp. 1447 - 1456
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 3rd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference, Gliwice, Poland, 5–9 July 2021

References

REFERENCES

CHNOS Elemental Analyzer manual. 2013. vario MICRO cube analyser. https://www.elementar.de/index.php?id=4531&L=1.Google Scholar
Culp, R, Cherkinsky, A, Ravi Prasad, GV. 2014. Comparison of radiocarbon techniques for the assessment of biobase content in fuels. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 93:106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.01.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijs, IJ, van der Windt, E, Kaihola, L, van der Borg, K. 2006. Quantitative determination by 14C analysis of the biological component in fuels. Radiocarbon 48(3):315–323. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200038777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, CG, Plymale, AE, Cooper, A, Kutnyakov, I, Swita, M, Lemmon, T, Olarte, MV, Wang, H. 2021. Determination of low-level biogenic gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel in blends using the direct liquid scintillation counting method for 14C content. Fuel 291(November 2020):120084. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, CG, Wright, CW, Morley, SM, Wright, BW. 2017. Analysis of fuel using the Direct LSC method determination of bio-originated fuel in the presence of quenching. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 122(January):215–221. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.01.040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goslar, T, Czernik, J, Goslar, E. 2004. Low-energy 14C AMS in Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poland. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 223–224:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajdas, I, Pearson, CL, Quarta, G, Kirsty, L, Spalding, HY, Yoneda, M. 2021. Radiocarbon dating. Encyclopedia of Earth Science Series 0123456789:689–702. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9694-0_3. http://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00058-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvatinčić, N, Barešić, J, Bronić, IK, Obelić, B. 2004. Measurement of low 14C activities in a liquid scintillation counter in the Zagreb Radiocarbon Laboratory. Radiocarbon 46(1):105–116. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200039412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaaslan, A, Gezen, M. 2022. The evaluation of renewable energy resources in Turkey by integer multi-objective selection problem with interval coefficient. Renewable Energy 182(2022):842–854. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajcar Bronić, I, Barešić, J, Horvatinčić, N, Sironić, A. 2017. Determination of biogenic component in liquid fuels by the 14C direct LSC method by using quenching properties of modern liquids for calibration. Radiation and Physics Chemistry 137:248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.01.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krištof, R. 2015. Quantification of biocomponents in fuels by 14C [dissertation]. Nova Gorcia, Slovenia: University of Nova Gorcia.Google Scholar
Krištof, R, Kožar Logar, J. 2013. Direct LSC method for measurements of biofuels in fuel. Talanta. 111:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.03.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krištof, R, Kožar Logar, J. 2017. Liquid scintillation spectrometry as a tool of biofuel quantification. Frontiers in Bioenergy and Biofuels. doi: 10.5772/65549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruccio, L, Quarta, G, Braione, E, Calcagnile, L. 2017. Measuring stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes by IRMS and 14C by AMS on samples with masses in the microgram range: Performances of the system installed at CEDAD-University of Salento. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 421:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Němec, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, H. 2010. Optimization of the graphitization process AT AGE-1. Radiocarbon 52(3):1380–1393. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200046464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, GA, Cline, AM, Thompson, GC. 2012. Use of radiocarbon analyses for determining levels of biodiesel in fuel blends—comparison with ASTM Method D7371 for FAME. Fuel 96:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazdur, A, Fogtman, M, Michczyński, A, Pawlyta, J. 2003. Precision of 14C dating in Gliwice radiocarbon laboratory. FIRI programme. Geochronometria 22(September 1999):27–40.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Michczyński, A, Pawlyta, J, Spahiu, P. 2000. Comparison of the radiocarbon dating methods used in the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory. Geochronometria 18:9–14.Google Scholar
Piotrowska, N. 2013. Status report of AMS sample preparation laboratory at GADAM Centre, Gliwice, Poland. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 294:176–181. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.05.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotrowska, N, Pazdur, A, Pawełczyk, S, Rakowski, AZ, Sensuła, B, Tudyka, K. 2020. Human Activity recorded in carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 in Gliwice urban area and surroundings (southern Poland) in the years 2011–2013. Radiocarbon 62(1):141–156. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2019.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, CM, Demello, JA, Carmichael, CA, Peacock, EE, Xu, L, Arey, JS. 2008. Determination of biodiesel blending percentages using natural abundance radiocarbon analysis: testing the accuracy of retail biodiesel blends. Environmental Science & Technology 42(7):2476–2482. doi: 10.1021/es071814j.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos Arévalo, FJ, Gómez Martínez, I, Agulló García, L, Reina Maldonado, MT, García León, M. 2015. 14C determination in different bio-based products. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 361:354–357. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2015.01.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudyka, K, Pawełczyk, F, Michczyński, A. 2021. Bias arising from 222Rn contamination in standardized methods for biobased content determination and a simple removal method. Measurement 167. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usman, M, Balsalobre-Lorente, D. 2022. Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Energy Policy 162(January):112780. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010. A revolutionary graphitisation system: Fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 268(7–8):931–934. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, T, Magill, CR, Herrle, JO. 2016. Carbon isotopes. In: Encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Part 2. p. 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar