Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T04:16:03.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dendrochronology and Radiocarbon Dating: The Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research Connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Steven W Leavitt  and
Bryant Bannister
Steven W Leavitt*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Bryant Bannister
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: sleavitt@ltrr.arizona.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The field of dendrochronology had a developmental “head start” of at least several decades relative to the inception of radiocarbon dating in the late 1940s, but that evolution was sufficiently advanced so that unique capabilities of tree-ring science could assure success of the 14C enterprise. The Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research (LTRR) at the University of Arizona played a central role in the cross-pollination of these disciplines by providing the first wood samples of exactly known age for the early testing and establishment of the “Curve of Knowns” by Willard Libby. From the 1950s into the early 1980s, LTRR continued to contribute dated wood samples (bristlecone pine and other wood species) to 14C research and development, including the discovery and characterization of de Vries/Suess “wiggles,” calibration of the 14C timescale, and a variety of tests to understand the natural variability of 14C and to refine sample treatment for maximum accuracy. The long and varied relationship of LTRR with 14C initiatives has continued with LTRR contributions to high-resolution studies through the 1990s and systematic efforts now underway that may eventually extend the bristlecone pine chronology back beyond its beginning 8836 yr ago as of 2009. This relationship has been mutualistic such that a half-century ago the visibility and stature of LTRR and dendrochronology were also elevated through their association with 14C-allied “hard sciences.”

Type
Calibration
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , 2009 , pp. 373 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, JR, Libby, WF. 1949. Age determinations by radiocarbon content: checks with samples of known age. Science 110(2869):678–80.Google Scholar
Arnold, JR, Libby, WF. 1951. Radiocarbon dates. Science 113(2927):111–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannister, B, Damon, PE. 1972. A dendrochronologically-derived primary standard for radiocarbon dating. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating. Wellington, New Zealand, October 1972. p H81–H89.Google Scholar
Brannon, HR, Daughtry, AC, Perry, D, Whitaker, WW, Williams, M. 1957. Radiocarbon evidence on the dilution of atmospheric and oceanic carbon by carbon from fossil fuels. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 38:643–50.Google Scholar
Cain, WF, Suess, HE. 1976. Carbon 14 in tree rings. Journal of Geophysical Research 81(21):3688–94.Google Scholar
Damon, PE. 1987. The history of the calibration of radiocarbon dates by dendrochronology. In: Aurenche, O, Evan, J, Hours, P, editors. Chronologies in the Near East. BAR International Series 379. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 61–104.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Peristykh, AN. 2000. Radiocarbon calibration and application to geophysics, solar physics, and astrophysics. Radiocarbon 42(1):137–50.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Sonett, CP. 1991. Solar and terrestrial components of the atmospheric 14C variation spectrum. In: Sonett, CP, Giampapa, MS, Matthews, MS, editors. The Sun in Time. Tucson, Arizona, USA: University of Arizona Press. p 360–88.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Long, A, Wallick, EI. 1973. On the magnitude of the 11-year radiocarbon cycle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 20(3):300–6.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Lerman, JC, Long, A. 1978. Temporal fluctuations of atmospheric 14C: causal factors and implications. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 6:457–94.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Lerman, JC, Long, A, Bannister, B, Klein, J, Linick, TW. 1980. Report on the workshop on the calibration of the radiocarbon dating time scale. Radiocarbon 22(3):947–9.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Eastoe, CJ, Hughes, MK, Kalin, RM, Long, A, Peristykh, AN. 1998. Secular variation in Δ14C during the Medieval Solar Maximum: a progress report. Radiocarbon 40(1):343–50.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Eastoe, CJ, Mikheeva, IB. 1999. The Maunder Minumum: an interlaboratory comparison of Δ14C from AD 1688 to AD 1710. Radiocarbon 41(1):47–50.Google Scholar
de Vries, H. 1958. Variation in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth. Proceedings of The Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen Series B 61:94–102.Google Scholar
de Vries, H. 1959. Measurement and use of natural radiocarbon. In: Abelson, PH, editor. Researches in Geochemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p 169–89.Google Scholar
Dorn, TF, Fairhall, AW, Schell, WR, Takashima, Y. 1962. Radiocarbon dating at the University of Washington. Radiocarbon 4:1–12.Google Scholar
Douglass, AE. 1927. Solar records in tree growth. Science 65(1679):220–1.Google Scholar
Douglass, AE. 1929. The secret of the Southwest solved by talkative tree rings. National Geographic Magazine 56(6):736–70.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW. 1968. Bristlecone pine: science and esthetics. A 7100–year tree-ring chronology aids scientists; old trees draw visitors to California mountains. Science 159(3817):839–46.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW. 1970a. Bristlecone pine chronology and calibration of the radiocarbon time scale. In: Smith, JHG, Worrall, J, editors. Tree-ring analysis with special reference to northwest America. The University of British Columbia Faculty of Forestry Bulletin 7:88–91.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW. 1970b. Dendrochronology of bristlecone pine, Pinus aristata: establishment of a 7484-year chronology in the White Mountains of eastern-central California, U.S.A. In: Olsson, IU, editor. Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. New York: John Wiley. p 237–59.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW, Graybill, DA. 1983. Dendrochronology of bristlecone pine: a progress report. Radiocarbon 25(2):287–8.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW, Huber, B, Suess, HE. 1966. Determination of the age of Swiss lake dwellings as an example of dendrochronologically-calibrated radiocarbon dating. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung, Teil A:1173–7.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW, Lawn, B, Michael, HN. 1985. Prospects for the extension of the bristlecone pine chronology: radiocarbon analysis of H-84-1. Meteoritics 20(2):415–21.Google Scholar
Friedrich, M, Remmele, S, Kromer, B, Hofmann, J, Spurk, M, Kaiser, KF, Orcel, C, Küppers, M. 2004. The 12,460-year Hohenheim oak and pine tree-ring chronology from Central Europe—a unique annual record for radiocarbon calibration and paleoenvironment reconstructions. Radiocarbon 46(3):1111–22.Google Scholar
Glock, WS, Agerter, S. 1963. Anomalous patterns in tree rings. Endeavor 22:9–13.Google Scholar
Hallman, C, Harlan, T, Arnott, H. 2006. Lost and found: the bristlecone pine collection. Tree-Ring Research 62(1):25–9.Google Scholar
Klein, J, Lerman, JC, Damon, PE, Ralph, EK. 1982. Calibration of radiocarbon dates: tables based on consensus data of the Workshop on Calibrating the Radiocarbon Time Scale. Radiocarbon 24(2):103–50.Google Scholar
LaMarche, VC Jr, Harlan, TP. 1973. Accuracy of tree ring dating of bristlecone pine for calibration of the radiocarbon time scale. Journal of Geophysical Research 78(36):8849–58.Google Scholar
Lerman, JC, Mook, WG, Vogel, JC. 1970. C14 in tree rings from different localities. In: Olsson, IU, editor. Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. New York: John Wiley. p 275–300.Google Scholar
Libby, WF. 1961. Radiocarbon dating. Science 133(3453):621–9.Google Scholar
Libby, WF. 1963. Accuracy of radiocarbon dates. Science 140(3564):278–80.Google Scholar
Libby, WF. 1967. History of radiocarbon dating. In: Radio-active Dating and Methods of Low-Level Counting. Vienna: IAEA STI/PUB/152. p 3–25.Google Scholar
Linick, TW, Suess, HE, Becker, B. 1985. La Jolla measurements of radiocarbon in south German oak tree-ring chronologies. Radiocarbon 27(1):20–32.Google Scholar
Linick, TW, Long, A, Damon, PE, Ferguson, CW. 1986. High-precision radiocarbon dating of bristlecone pine from 6554 to 5350 BC. Radiocarbon 28(2B):943–53.Google Scholar
Long, A, Arnold, DL, Damon, PE, Lerman, JC, Wilson, AT. 1979. Radial translocation of carbon in bristlecone pine. In: Berger, R, Suess, HE, editors. Radiocarbon Dating, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating, Los Angeles and La Jolla, 1976. Berkeley: University of California Press. p 532–7.Google Scholar
Marlowe, G. 1999. Year one: radiocarbon dating and American archaeology, 1947–48. American Antiquity 64(1):9–32.Google Scholar
McGraw, DJ. 2007. Edmund Schulman and the “Living Ruins.” Bishop, California, USA: Community Printing and Publishing. 161 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU. 1980. 14C in extractives from wood. Radiocarbon 22(2):515–24.Google Scholar
Polach, HA. 1979. Correlation of 14C activity of NBS oxalic acid with Arizona 1850 wood and ANU sucrose standards. In: Berger, R, Suess, HE, editors. Radiocarbon Dating, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating, Los Angeles and La Jolla, 1976. Berkeley: University of California Press. p 115–24.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Schulman, E. 1954. Longevity under adversity in conifers. Science 119(3901):396–9.Google Scholar
Schulman, E. 1956. Dendroclimatic Changes in Semiarid America. Tucson, Arizona, USA: University of Arizona Press. 142 p.Google Scholar
Schulman, E. 1958. Bristlecone pine, oldest known living thing. National Geographic Magazine 113(3):354–72.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1961. Variations in radiocarbon concentration and sunspot activity. Journal of Geophysical Research 66(1):273–6.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1965. Carbon-14 content of 18th- and 19th-century wood: variations correlated with sunspot activity. Science 149(3683):533–4.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF. 1993. Sun, ocean, climate and atmospheric 14CO2: an evaluation of causal and spectral relationships. The Holocene 3(4):289–305.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Quay, PD. 1980. Changes in atmospheric carbon-14 attributed to a variable sun. Science 207(4426):11–9.Google Scholar
Suess, HE. 1955. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122(3166):415–7.Google Scholar
Suess, HE. 1965. Secular variations of the cosmic-ray-produced carbon 14 in the atmosphere and their interpretations. Journal of Geophysical Research 70(23):5937–52.Google Scholar
Taylor, RE. 1987. Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. New York: Academic Press. 212 p.Google Scholar
Whitaker, WW, Valastro, S Jr, Williams, M. 1959. The climatic factor in the radiocarbon content of woods. Journal of Geophysical Research 64(8):1023–9.Google Scholar