Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:38:09.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calibration of Mangerud'S Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Adam Walanus  and
Dorota Nalepka
Adam Walanus*
Affiliation:
Department of Geoinformatics, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.
Dorota Nalepka
Affiliation:
W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland.
*
Corresponding author. Email: walanus@geol.agh.edu.pl.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The “calibration” of arbitrarily defined (in some sense, “conventional”) ages, given in conventional radiocarbon years BP, is now becoming necessary because the term “radiocarbon age” is used less often in archaeological and Quaternary practice. The standard calibration procedure is inappropriate here because Mangerud's boundaries are not measurement results. Thus, another approach to the problem is proposed in order to model the natural situation of many, uniformly distributed, dated samples, which should be similarly divided by the original and “calibrated” boundary. However, the result depends on the value of the typical measurement error and is not unequivocal.

Type
Calibration
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , 2010 , pp. 1639 - 1644
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Anderson, DE, Goudie, AS, Parker, AG. 2007. Global Environments through the Quaternary Exploring Environmental Change. New York: Oxford University Press. 359 p.Google Scholar
Berglund, BE, Gaillard, M-J, Björkman, L, Persson, T. 2008. Long-term changes in floristic diversity in southern Sweden: palynological richness, vegetation dynamics and land-use. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 17(5):573–83.Google Scholar
Buck, CE, Higham, TFG, Lowe, DJ. 2003. Bayesian tools for tephrochronology. The Holocene 13(5):639–47.Google Scholar
Haynes, V Jr. 2008. Younger Dryas “black mats” and the Rancholabrean termination in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(18):6520–5Google Scholar
Mangerud, J, Andersen, ST, Berglund, BE, Donner, J. 1974. Quaternary stratigraphy of Norden, a proposal for terminology and classification. Boreas 3(3):109–26.Google Scholar
Niinemets, E, Hang, T. 2009. Ostracod assemblages indicating a low water level episode of Lake Peipsi at the beginning of the Holocene. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences 58(2)133–47.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybníček, K, Rybníčková, E. 2008. Upper Holocene dry land vegetation in the Moravian-Slovakian boreland (Czech and Slovak Republics). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 17:701–11.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Bryant, C, O'Donnell, D. 2007. A report on Phase 1 of the 5th International Radiocarbon Intercomparison. Radiocarbon 49(2):409–26.Google Scholar
Sørensen, R. 2008. Late Weichselian deglaciation in the Oslofjord area, south Norway. Boreas 8(2):241–6.Google Scholar
Walanus, A. 2009. Systematic bias of radiocarbon method. Radiocarbon 51(2):433–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M, Johnsen, S, Rasmussen, SO, Popp, T, Steffensen, J-P, Gibbard, P, Hoek, W, Lowe, J, Andrews, J, Björck, S, Cwynar, LC, Hughen, K, Kershaw, P, Kromer, B, Litt, T, Lowe, DJ, Nakagawa, T, Newnham, R, Schwander, J. 2009. Formal definition and dating of the GSSP (Global Stratotype Section and Point) for the base of the Holocene using the Greenland NGRIP ice core, and selected auxiliary records. Journal of Quaternary Science 24(1):3–17.Google Scholar
Wanner, H, Beer, J, Bütikofer, J, Crowley, TJ, Cubasch, U, Flückiger, J, Goosse, H, Grosjean, M, Joos, F, Kaplan, JO, Küttel, M, Müller, SA, Prentice, IC, Solomina, O, Stocker, TF, Tarasov, P, Wagner, M, Widmannm, M. 2008. Mid- to Late Holocene climate change: an overview. Quaternary Science Reviews 27(19–20):1791–828.Google Scholar
Webb, SD, editor. 2006. First Floridians and Last Mastodons: The Page-Ladson Site in the Aucilla River. Topics in Geobiology 26. Dordrecht: Springer. 588 p.Google Scholar