Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:18:35.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Apparent Ages of Marine Shells: Implications for Archaeological Dating in Hawai'i

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Tom Dye*
Affiliation:
State of Hawai'i, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawai'i 96809
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The conventional 14C ages of 8 marine shells of known age and 11 marine shells stratigraphically associated with dated wood charcoal show considerable variation from expected ages. One source of this variation is seashore geology; comparison of 6 AMS dates on 3 species of shallow-water, herbivorous gastropod shells from Pleistocene limestone and Holocene volcanic coasts shows that shells from Pleistocene limestone coasts can have apparent, or reservoir, 14C ages up to 620 yr greater than shells of the same species from volcanic coasts. The relatively great variation in apparent ages of Hawaiian marine shells poses problems for their use in dating archaeological sites. For best results, an archaeological marine shell should be sourced to a particular local environment, and the apparent age of shells in that environment determined by dating well-provenienced shells of known age.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Athens, J. S. 1985 Prehistoric Investigations at an Inland Site on the Leeward Slopes of Central Molokai. Honolulu, Privately published: 117 P.Google Scholar
Beggerly, P. E. P. (ms.) 1990 Kahana Valley, Hawai'i: A Geomorphic Artifact: A Study of the Interrelationships Among Geomorphic Structures, Natural Processes, and Ancient Hawaiian Technology, Land Use, and Settlement Patterns: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S. and Olson, E. A. 1961 Lamont radiocarbon measurements VIII. Radiocarbon 3: 176204.Google Scholar
Davis, B. D. (ms.) 1990 Human Settlement in Pristine Insular Environments: A Hawaiian Case Study from Barbers Point, Southwestern Oahu: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Emory, K. P. and Sinoto, Y. H. 1969 Age of sites in the South Point area, Ka'u, Hawaii. Pacific Anthropological Records 8. Honolulu, Department of Anthropology, Bernice P. Bishop Museum: 17 p.Google Scholar
Holcomb, R. T. 1987 Eruptive history and long-term behavior of Kilauea volcano. in Decker, R. W., Wright, T. L. and Stauffer, P. H., eds., Volcanism in Hawaii. Denver, Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey: 261350.Google Scholar
Kay, E. A. 1979 Hawaiian marine shells. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Special Publication 64(4). Honolulu, Bishop Museum Press: 653 P.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. P., Lipman, P. W., Petersen, L. D. and Warshauer, F. R. 1988 Generalized ages of surface lava flows of Mauna Loa Volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1908.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G. A. and Abbott, A. T. 1970 Volcanoes in the Sea: The Geology of Hawaii. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press: 441 P.Google Scholar
Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N. 1935 Geology and ground-water resources of the island of Oahu, Hawaii. Division of Hydrography Bulletin 1. Spreckelsville, Maui and Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii: 479 p.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Braziunas, T. F. 1993 Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. in Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 137189.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Pearson, G. W. and Braziunas, T. 1986 Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal BP. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 9801021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. E. 1987 Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. Orlando, Florida, Academic Press: 212 P.Google Scholar