Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:30:13.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Early Holocene/Late Pleistocene Archaeological Site on the Oregon Coast? Comments on Hall Et Al. (2005)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Madonna L Moss ,
Thomas J Connolly ,
Jon M Erlandson  and
Guy L Tasa
Madonna L Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1218, USA
Thomas J Connolly
Affiliation:
Research Division, University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
Jon M Erlandson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1218, USA Research Division, University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
Guy L Tasa
Affiliation:
Research Division, University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the journal Radiocarbon, Hall et al. (2005:383) claim that 35-CS-9, located in Bandon Ocean Wayside State Park on the southern Oregon coast, is one of the few Oregon coast sites “that includes sediments and artifacts dating to the early Holocene and possibly to the late Pleistocene.” Their claim for an early Holocene or late Pleistocene human occupation rests on a single radiocarbon date of 11,000 ± 140 BP (12,710–12,680 cal BP) taken from charcoal found at least 20 cm below the nearest artifact. Although Hall et al. compile various kinds of geoarchaeological evidence to support this claim, their case is not convincing. While we applaud aspects of their analyses, the inferences they have drawn are not substantiated by the evidence they present. We agree that 35-CS-9 is a significant site but believe claims for the antiquity of its human use have been exaggerated.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , 2006 , pp. 237 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Collins, LR. 1953. Archaeological survey of the Oregon coast from June 1951–December 1952 [unpublished manuscript on file at the Oregon State Museum of Anthropology]. Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM. 1984. A case study in faunalturbation: delineating the effects of the burrowing pocket gopher on the distribution of archaeological materials. American Antiquity 49:785–90.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Rockwell, T. 1987. Radiocarbon reversals and stratigraphic discontinuities: natural formation processes in coastal California archaeological sites. In: Nash, D, Petraglia, M, editors. Natural Formation Processes and the Archaeological Record. British Archaeological Reports 352:51–73.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Moss, ML. 1993. An evaluation, survey, and dating program for Oregon coast archaeological sites on state lands of the central Oregon coast [report submitted to the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, Salem].Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Kennett, DL, Ingram, BL, Guthrie, DA, Morris, DP, Tveskov, M, West, GJ, Walker, P. 1996. An archaeological and paleontological chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261), San Miguel Island, California. Radiocarbon 38(2):355–73.Google Scholar
Gifford-Gonzalez, DP, Damrosch, DB, Damrosch, DR, Pryor, J, Thunen, RL. 1985. The third dimension in site structure: an experiment in trampling and vertical dispersal. American Antiquity 50(4):803–18.Google Scholar
Hall, R, Davis, LG, Willis, S, Fillmore, M. 2005. Radiocarbon, soil, and artifact chronologies for an early southern Oregon coastal site. Radiocarbon 47(3):383–94.Google Scholar
Johnson, DL. 1989. Subsurface stone lines, stone zones, artifact-manuport layers and biomantles produced by bioturbation via pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae). American Antiquity 54:370–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, JH. 2002. Evaluating natural site formation processes in eolian dune sands: a case study from the Krmpotich Folsom Site, Killpecker Dunes, Wyoming. Journal of Archaeological Science 29:1199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor, R. 1986. An evaluation of archaeological sites on state park lands along the Oregon coast. Eugene: Heritage Research Associates Report 44.Google Scholar
Minor, R. 1995. A reassessment of early “Pre-Littoral” radiocarbon dates from the southern Northwest Coast. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 17(2):267–73.Google Scholar
Moss, ML, Erlandson, JM. 1998. Early Holocene adaptations on the southern Northwest coast. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 20(1):13–25.Google Scholar
Ross, R. 1976. Archaeological survey of state park lands along the Oregon coast [report on file]. Salem: Oregon State Parks and Recreation.Google Scholar
Schiffer, MB. 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: the case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:13–30.Google Scholar
Tasa, GL, Knowles, JA, Peterson, J. 2004. Archaeological resource evaluation of Areas 1 and 4, Oregon State Parks, 2003/2004 Surveys, OSMA Report 2004–7. Eugene: University of Oregon State Museum of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Villa, P. 1982. Conjoinable pieces and site formation processes. American Antiquity 47:276–90.Google Scholar