Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-dwt4q Total loading time: 0.174 Render date: 2021-06-18T02:53:25.606Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }
EnglishFrançais
Radiocarbon Radiocarbon

Article contents

AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Giant Rock Scallop (Hinnites Multirugosus) Artifacts from San Miguel Island, California, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Todd J Braje ,
Torben C Rick  and
Jon M Erlandson
Todd J Braje
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521, USA
Torben C Rick
Affiliation:
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Department of Anthropology, Washington DC 20013-7012, USA
Jon M Erlandson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1218, USA. Also: Museum of Natural and Cultural History, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1224, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:
tjb50@humboldt.edu
Save pdf (5 mb)
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For at least 100,000 yr, marine shell beads have been important ornamental and symbolic artifacts intimately associated with the behavior of anatomically modern humans. In California, giant rock scallop (Hinnites multirugosus) beads were once thought to have been used only for the last 1000 yr, where they were considered to be markers of high social status among the Chumash Indians of the Santa Barbara Channel region. Direct accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating of 1 giant rock scallop ornament and 2 beads from San Miguel Island extends the use of this shell for personal adornment to at least 8000 cal BP. Our study emphasizes the importance of direct AMS 14C dating of artifacts to enhance cultural chronologies and clarify the antiquity of various technologies and associated behaviors. Our results also caution archaeologists when equating artifact rarity with sociopolitical complexity.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , 2008 , pp. 223 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arnold, JE. 1991. Transformation of a regional economy: sociopolitical evolution and the production of valuables in southern California. Antiquity 65(249):953–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, JE. 1992. Complex hunter-gatherer-fishers of prehistoric California: chiefs, specialists, and maritime adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57(1):60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, JE. 2000. The origins of hierarchy and the nature of hierarchical structures in prehistoric California. In: Diehl, MW, editor. Hierarchies in Action: Cui Bono? Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigation, Southern Illinois University. p 221–40.Google Scholar
Arnold, JE, editor. 2001. The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. 317 p.Google Scholar
Arnold, JE, Graesch, AP. 2001. The evolution of specialized shellworking among the Island Chumash. In: Arnold, JE, editor. The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. p 71–112.Google Scholar
Bouzouggar, A, Barton, N, Vanhaeren, M, d'Errico, F, Collcutt, S, Higham, T, Hodge, E, Parfitt, S, Rhodes, E, Schwenninger, J-L, Stringer, C, Turner, E, Ward, S, Moutmir, A, Stambouli, A. 2007. 82,000-year-old shell beads from north Africa and implications for the origins of modern human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(24):9964–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennyhoff, JA, Hughes, RE. 1987. Shell Bead and Ornament Exchange Networks Between California and the Western Great Basin. Anthropological Papers Volume 64, Part 2. New York: American Museum of Natural History. 95 p.Google Scholar
Braje, TJ. 2007. Archaeology, human impacts, and historical ecology on San Miguel Island, California [PhD dissertation]. Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Braje, TJ, Erlandson, JM, Rick, TC. 2004. An 8700 CALYBP shell midden from the south coast of San Miguel Island, California. Current Research in the Pleistocene 21:24–5.Google Scholar
Culleton, BJ, Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Erlandson, JM, Southon, JR. 2006. Intrashell radiocarbon variability in marine mollusks. Radiocarbon 48(3):387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Errico, F, Henshilwood, C, Vanhaeren, M, van Niekerk, K. 2005. Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution 48(1):3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erlandson, JM. 1994. Early Hunter-Gatherers of the California Coast. New York: Plenum Press. 364 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Guthrie, DA, Morris, DP, Tveskov, T, West, GJ, Walker, PL. 1996. An archaeological and paleontological chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261), San Miguel Island, California. Radiocarbon 38(2):355–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Braje, TJ, Rick, TC, Peterson, J. 2005a. Beads, bifaces, and boats: an early maritime adaptation on the south coast of San Miguel Island, California. American Anthropologist 107(4):677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Macko, ME, Koerper, HC, Southon, J. 2005b. The antiquity of Olivella shell beads at CAORA-64: AMS radiocarbon dated between 9420 and 7780 cal BP. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(3): 393–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, RT, Jones, TL, Schroth, A. 2005. Ancient longdistance trade in western North America: new AMS radiocarbon dates from southern California. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(3):423–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, RO. 1975. The beads of Humaliwo. The Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 2(1): 110–9.Google Scholar
Gibson, RO. 1992. An introduction to the study of aboriginal beads from California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 28(3):1–45.Google Scholar
Gifford, EW. 1947. Californian shell artifacts. University of California Anthropological Records 9(1):1–114.Google Scholar
Harrington, JP. 1928. Exploration of the Burton mound at Santa Barbara, California. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1926–1927 44:23–168.Google Scholar
Henshilwood, C, d'Errico, F, Vanhaeren, M, van Niekerk, K, Jacobs, Z. 2004. Middle Stone Age beads from South Africa. Science 304(5669):404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, WH. 1883. Art in shell of the ancient Americans. In: Powell, JW, editor. Second Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. p 185–305.Google Scholar
Ingram, BL, Southon, JR. 1996. Reservoir ages in eastern Pacific coastal and estuarine waters. Radiocarbon 38(3):573–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junger, A, Johnson, DL. 1980. Was there a Quaternary land bridge to the Northern Channel Islands? In: Power, DM, editor. The California Islands Symposium: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 33–9.Google Scholar
Kennett, DJ. 2005. The Island Chumash: Behavioral Ecology of a Maritime Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. 320 p.Google Scholar
Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Erlandson, JM, Walker, P. 1997. Evidence for temporal fluctuations in marine radiocarbon reservoir ages in the Santa Barbara Channel, southern California. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(11):1051–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CD. 1990. The Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used for Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before A.D. 1804. New York: Garland Publishing. 296 p.Google Scholar
Morse, K. 1993. Shell beads from Mandu Mandu Creek Rock-shelter, Cape Range Peninsula, western Australia, dated before 30,000 B.P. Antiquity 67(257):877–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, PC. 1968. Prehistory of Santa Rosa Island. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. 253 p.Google Scholar
Rick, TC. 2007. The Archaeology and Historical Ecology of Late Holocene San Miguel Island. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA. 180 p.Google Scholar
Rick, TC, Vellanoweth, RL, Erlandson, JM, Kennett, DJ. 2002. On the antiquity of the single-piece shell fishhook: AMS radiocarbon evidence from the southern California coast. Journal of Archaeological Science 29(9):933–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rick, TC, Erlandson, JM, Vellanoweth, RL, Braje, TJ. 2005. From Pleistocene mariners to complex hunter-gatherers: the archaeology of the California Channel Islands. Journal of World Prehistory 19(3):169–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenherr, A, Feldmath, CR, Emerson, M. 1999. Natural History of the Islands of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW. 2000. CALIB 4.3 radiocarbon calibration program. [WWW program and documentation]. Seattle: University of Washington and Belfast: Queen's University Belfast. URL: http://www.calib.org.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW. 2005. CALIB 5 manual [WWW document]. URL: http://calib.qub.ac.uk/calib/manual/.Google Scholar
Trigger, BG. 2006. A History of Archaeological Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. 500 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhaeren, M, d'Errico, F, Stringer, C, James, SL, Todd, JA, Mienis, HK. 2006. Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science 312(5781):1785–8.Google Scholar
Vellanoweth, RL. 2001. AMS radiocarbon dating and shell bead chronologies: Middle Holocene exchange and interaction in western North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 28(9):941–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have Access
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Giant Rock Scallop (Hinnites Multirugosus) Artifacts from San Miguel Island, California, USA
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Giant Rock Scallop (Hinnites Multirugosus) Artifacts from San Miguel Island, California, USA
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Giant Rock Scallop (Hinnites Multirugosus) Artifacts from San Miguel Island, California, USA
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *