Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

AMS Dating Mammoth Bones: Comparison with Conventional Dating

  • Yurij K Vasil'chuk (a1), Alla C Vasil'chuk (a1), Austin Long (a2), A J T Jull (a3) and D J Donahue (a3)...

Abstract

Fossilized Siberian mammoth remains are important indicators of environmental change in the Late Pleistocene. The NSF-Arizona AMS Laboratory radiocarbon results on amino acid separations compare well with mammoth bone collagen from the same specimens treated by HCl and dated by beta counting (the Russian Academy Geological Institute Radiocarbon Laboratory). Neither laboratory was aware of the other's dates for these comparisons. The results coincide very closely (a difference of 50–800 yr), and demonstrate that AMS dating provides a very good perspective for applications of past mammoth population studies.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      AMS Dating Mammoth Bones: Comparison with Conventional Dating
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      AMS Dating Mammoth Bones: Comparison with Conventional Dating
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      AMS Dating Mammoth Bones: Comparison with Conventional Dating
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Email: vasilch@orc.ru.

References

Hide All
Arslanov, KhA, Svezhentsev, YuS. 1993. An improved method for radiocarbon dating fossil bones. Radiocarbon 35(3):387–91.
Lister, AM. 1993. Mammoths in miniature. Nature 362(6418):288–9.
Long, A, Sher, A, Vartanyan, S. 1994. Holocene mammoths dates. Nature 369(6479):364.
Pfizenmayer, EW. 1926. Mammutleichen und Urwaldmenschen in Nordost Sibirien. Leipzig (341 s. + 118 abb. + 3k; in German).
Shilo, N, Lozkin, A, Titov, E, Yu, Shumilov. 1993. Kirgilyakhsky mammoth. Palaeogeographycal aspect. Moscow, Nauka: 214 p (in Russian).
VYe, Sokolov, editor. Yuribeisky mammoth. 1982. Moscow: Nauka. 160 p (in Russian).
Stuart, AJ. 1991. Mammalian extinctions in the Late Pleistocene of northern Eurasia and North America. Biological Reviews 66:453562.
Sulerzhitsky, LD. 1995. Features of radiocarbon chronology of the mammoths (Mammutus primigenius) of Siberia and North-Eastern Europe. In: Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg. Studies of Pleistocene and Recent Mammals 263:163–83 (in Russian).
Sulerzhitsky, LD. 1997. Features of radiocarbon chronology of the mammoths of Siberia and North-Eastern Europe, as basis for Human colonization. In: Velichko, A, Soffer, O, editors. Human colonization of Earth. The global hominids settling . Moscow: The Geography Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. p 184200 (in Russian).
Sulerzhitsky, LD, Romanenko, FA. 1997. Age and distribution of the “mammoth” fauna of the polar region of Asia (radiocarbon dating results). Earth Cryosphere 1(4):12–9 (in Russian).
Vasil'chuk, YuK. 1992. Oxygen isotope composition of ground ice (application to paleogeocryological reconstructions). Two volumes. Moscow: Theoretical Problems Department, Russian Academy of Sciences and Moscow University. Vol 1: 420 p, Vol 2: 264 p (in Russian).
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Punning, J-M, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1997. Radiocarbon ages of mammoths in Northern Eurasia: implications for population development and Late Quaternary environment. Radiocarbon 39(1):118.
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1995. Ice-wedge formation in Northern Asia during the Holocene. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 6(3):273–9.
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1997. Radiocarbon dating and oxygen isotope variations in Late Pleistocene syngenetic ice-wedges, Northern Siberia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 8(3):335–45.
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1998. 14C and 18O in Siberian syngenetic ice-wedge complexes. Radiocarbon 40(2):883–93.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed