Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:15:30.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absolute Radiocarbon Chronology in the Formative Pottery Production Center of Santa Lucía, Cochabamba, Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Olga U Gabelmann
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin, ZI Lateinamerika-Institut, Rüdesheimer Str. 54-56, 14197 Berlin, Germany
Adam Michczyński*
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Radiocarbon Laboratory, GADAM Centre of Excellence, Bolesława Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Anna Pazdur
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Radiocarbon Laboratory, GADAM Centre of Excellence, Bolesława Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Jacek Pawlyta
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Radiocarbon Laboratory, GADAM Centre of Excellence, Bolesława Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Corresponding author. Email: Adam.Michczynski@polsl.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Santa Lucía is a pottery production site dating to the Formative period (about 1600 BC to AD 200). It is located in the Cochabamba valleys of the eastern Bolivian Andes. The settlement consists of a residential area and a separate workshop area. A peripheral sector of ash mounds was used as refuse sites and burial grounds. The excavations yielded a total of 16 radiocarbon samples from all 3 sectors, which were dated at the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory (Gliwice, Poland). The results from the deepest trench in the workshop sector (Trench 5) provide information for the stratigraphic sequence and help to define spatial and socioeconomic changes at around 600–500 BC with the beginning of the Late Formative or Santa Lucía III phase. The 14C dates from Santa Lucía, therefore, contribute to a better definition of the existing regional Formative period phases and finally to a better understanding of the processes during the Formative period in the south-central Andes.

Type
Radiocarbon, Archaeology, and Landscape Change
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Brockington, DL, Pereira Herrera, D, Sanzetenea Rocha, R, Céspedes Paz, R, Perez, C. 1985. Informe Preliminar de las Excavaciones en Sierra Mokho y Chullpa Pata (Periodo Formativo). Cuadernos de Investigación, Serie Arqueología No. 5, Cochabamba.Google Scholar
Brockington, DL, Pereira Herrera, D, Sanzetenea Rocha, R, Céspedes Paz, R, Perez, C. 1987. Formative Period Archaeological Sequences in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Report to the National Geographic Society. Washington DC.Google Scholar
Brockington, DL, Pereira Herrera, D, Sanzetenea Rocha, R, Muñoz, M. 1995. Estudios Arqueológicos del Periodo Formativo en el Sur-Este de Cochabamba 1988–1989. Cuadernos de Investigación, Serie Arqueología No. 8, Cochabamba.Google Scholar
Gabelmann, OU. 2001. Choroqollo—producción de cerámica e intercambio de bienes durante el Período Formativo. Un ejemplo del Valle Santivańez, Cochabamba. Textos Antropológicos 13(1–2):197229.Google Scholar
Gabelmann, OU. 2008. Keramikproduktion in Santa Lucía. Ein Blick auf die “Peripherie” des Formativums im südzentralen Andenraum [PhD dissertation]. Berlin: Freie Universität.Google Scholar
Ibarra Grasso, DE. 1962. Die bolivianische Vorgeschichte. Saeculum 13(4):330–54.Google Scholar
Ibarra Grasso, DE, Querejazu Lewis, R. 1986. 30.000 años de Prehistoria en Bolivia. La Paz, Cochabamba.Google Scholar
Kaulicke, P. 1998. Perspectivas regionales del Período Formativo en el Perú: una introducción. In: Kaulicke, P, editor. Perspectivas Regionales del Período Formativo en el Perú. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, No. 2, Lima. p 913.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Higham, TFG, Reimer, PJ. 2004. SHCal04 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–11.0 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1087–92.Google Scholar
Pawlyta, J, Pazdur, A, Rakowski, A, Miller, B, Harkness, DD. 1998. Commissioning of Quantulus 1220™ liquid scintillation beta spectrometer for measuring 14C and 3H at natural abundance levels. Radiocarbon 40(1):201–9.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Pazdur, MF. 1986. Aparatura pomiarowa LaboratoriumC-14 w Gliwicach. Do wiadczenia konstrukcyjne i eksploatacyjne (The measuring equipment of the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory. Experience gathered in the construction and exploitation). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej, Seria Matematyka-Fizyka, Z. 46. Geochronometria 1:5569.Google Scholar
Pereira Herrera, D, Brockington, DL. editors. 2000. Investigaciones Arqueológicas en las Tierras Tropicales del Departamento de Cochabamba—Bolivia. Cuadernos de Investigaciön, Serie Arqueología No. 9, Cochabamba.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Rice, PM. 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 584 p.Google Scholar
Rydén, S. 1961. Complementary notes on Pre-Tiahuanaco site Chullpa Pampa in Cochabamba area and notes on one Tiahuanaco site in La Paz, Bolivia. Ethnos 26:4055.Google Scholar
Stanish, C. 2003. Ancient Titicaca. The Evolution of Complex Society in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press. 354 p.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Walter, H. 1966. Beiträge zur Archäologie Boliviens. Die Grabungen des Museums für Völkerkunde Berlin im Jahre 1958. Achäologische Studien in den Kordilleren Boliviens II. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Ziółkowski, MS, Pazdur, MF, Krzanowski, A, Michczyński, A, editors. 1994. ANDES. Radiocarbon database for Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. Warsaw, Gliwice: Andean Archaeological Mission of the Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw University; Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory of the Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University.Google Scholar