Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:40:01.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Many Faces of Political Eve: Representations of Queensland Women Parliamentarians in the Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Julie Ustinoff
Get access

Extract

‘Forget Policy — I've Got Great Legs!’ That newspaper headline was one of the most interesting if not anomalous banners to appear during the 1998 federal election campaign. It was run in the Daily Telegraph as the header to an article about Pauline Hanson, who was busy campaigning for the Queensland seat of Blair in the state elections. As one might expect from the headline, the story dismissed any consideration of Hanson's political agenda in favour of blatant and highly sexualised comment about her very feminine physical attributes. Whilst this sort of media attention openly negated Hanson as a serious political force, it was indicative of the way the media had come to portray her since she arrived on the political scene two years earlier. Moreover, it was symptomatic of the media's widespread concern with portraying female politicians of all parties in accordance with worn-out assumptions and clichés, which rarely — if ever — were applied to their male counterparts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Queensland Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2: Special Issue: The Centenary of Women's Suffrage in Queensland , November 2005 , pp. 97 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Daily Telegraph (Sydney), 15 September 1998: 1, 4.Google Scholar

2 Courier-Mail (Brisbane), 4 March 1996: 3.Google Scholar

3 Courier-Mail, 4 March 1996: 3.Google Scholar

4 Pauline Hanson, maiden speech in federal Parliament, 10 September 1996.Google Scholar

5 Hanson, maiden speech.Google Scholar

6 Jenkins, Cathy, ‘The More Things Change: Women, Politics and the Press in Australia’, Ejournalist. 2(1) (2002): 2.Google Scholar

7 Jenkins’ study covers the period beginning with Edith Cowan in 1921 and ends with Joan Kimer in 1990, but also considers more recent coverage.Google Scholar

8 Jenkins, ‘The More Things Change’: 6.Google Scholar

9 Private lives were defined as those covering: spouse, children, relatives, physical appearance, dress, personality, age and background. Public lives were defined as those issues relating to: education, work or profession, community, politics and sport.Google Scholar

10 Jenkins, ‘The More Things Change’: 14.Google Scholar

11 Elizabeth van Acker, ‘Portrayals of Politicians and Women's Interests: Saviours, “Sinners” and “Stars”’, paper delivered at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 29 September–1 October 2003: 3.Google Scholar

12 van Acker, ‘Portrayals of Politicians and Women's Interests’: 2.Google Scholar

13 Norris, Pippa, ‘Women Leaders Worldwide: A Splash of Color in the Photo Op’, in Pippa Norris (ed.), Women, Media and Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997): 161.Google Scholar

14 Baird, Julia, Media Tarts: How The Australian Press Frames Female Politicians (Melbourne: Scribe Publications, 2004): 2.Google Scholar

15 Courier-Mail, 8 August 1980.Google Scholar

16 Leigh Young review of Waveney Browne, A Woman of Distinction (Brisbane: Boolarong Publications, 1981) in Courier-Mail, 19 September 1981.Google Scholar

17 See, for example: Courier Mail, 24 March 1980, 19 September 1981, 8 December 1982, funeral notice 1 September 1986, and 2 April 1987.Google Scholar

18 Baird, Media Tarts: 1.Google Scholar

19 Kernot, Cheryl, cited in Karen Ross, Women, Politics, Media (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2002): 103.Google Scholar

20 McGeough, Paul, ‘The Other Side of Saint Cheryl’, Sydney Morning Herald, 13 December 1997.Google Scholar

21 Baird, Media Tarts: 173.Google Scholar

22 See Breit, Rhonda, Harrison, John, Hirst, Martin, McLellan, Trina and Barlett, Desley, ‘Ethics in Journalism and Cheryl Kernot: A Colloquium’, Australian Studies in Journalism, 10–11 (2001–02): 33–57.Google Scholar

23 Baird, Media Tarts: 201.Google Scholar

24 Weekend Australian, 18–19 October 1997: 2.Google Scholar

25 Australian, 16 October 1997: 3.Google Scholar

26 Ramsey, cited in Baird, Media Tarts: 167.Google Scholar

27 Martin Hirst in Breit et al, p. 47.Google Scholar

28 Randall, Don, Adjournment debate in Parliament, 12 March 1998 cited in Hirst ‘the domestication of a ‘feral’ Cheryl in Breit et al, ‘Ethics in Journalism and Cheryl Kernot’: 44–45.Google Scholar

29 van, Acker, ‘Portrayals of Politicians and Women's Interests’: 11.Google Scholar

30 Cartoon cited in ‘Portrayals of Politicians and Women's Interests’: 11.Google Scholar

31 Neill, Rosemary, ‘Affair Exposes Double Standard’, Australian, 5 July 2002: 11.Google Scholar

32 Christine Wallace, cited in Baird, Media Tarts: 181.Google Scholar

33 Johnson, Bruce, ‘Two Paulines, Two Nations: An Australian Case Study in the Intersection of Popular Music and Politics’, Popular Music and Society, 23(1) (2003): 54.Google Scholar

34 Lumby, Catherine, Gotcha: Life in a Tabloid Word (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1999).Google Scholar

35 Rothwell, Nicolas, ‘Thirteen Ways Not to Think About Pauline Hanson’, in Abbott, Tony et al. . (eds), Two Nations (Melbourne: Bookman Press, 1998): 161–68.Google Scholar

36 Lake, Marilyn, ‘Pauline Hanson: Virago in Parliament, Viagra in the Bush’, in Abbott et al. ., Two Nations: 114.Google Scholar

37 Acker, van, ‘Media Portrayals of Politicians and Women's Interests’: 13.Google Scholar

38 Marilyn Lake cited in van Acker, ‘Media Portrayals of Politicians and Women's Interests’: 13.Google Scholar

39 Jenkins, ‘The More Things Change’: 20.Google Scholar

40 Clack, Peter, ‘Hanson Savaged, Cheated by Relentless Media Ridicule’, Australasian Business Intelligence, 20 January 2002.Google Scholar

41 Sunday Mail (Brisbane), 30 June 2002.Google Scholar