Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T10:44:38.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Radio-Wave Technique in X-Ray Astronomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

P. J. Edwards
P. J. Edwards*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is evident that the limited duration of a single rocket or balloon flight is a severe handicap to the study of variable X-ray sources like Cen XR-2, the early history of which can only be conjectured from the few available rocket observations. The whole question of the variability of X-ray sources remains in doubt because of the difficulty of relating infrequent high-altitude flux measurements of short duration made with a variety of instruments. There are obvious advantages in a method of monitoring celestial X-ray fluxes from the ground for prolonged periods of time. Such a method has recently been found and, although presently restricted to strong sources like Sco XR-1 and Cen XR-2, is capable of considerable refinement.

Type
Contributions
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 1 , Issue 6 , September 1969 , pp. 290 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harries, J., McCracken, K. G., Francey, R. J. and Fenton, A. G., Nature, 215, 38 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Edwards, P. J., Burtt, G. J. and Knox, F., Nature (in press, 1969).Google Scholar
3 Nicolet, M. and Aikin, A. C., 3. Geophys. Res., 65, 1469 (1960).Google Scholar
4 Deeks, D. G., Proc. Roy. Soc, London, 291, 413 (1966).Google Scholar
5 Seward, F., Chodil, G., Mark, H., Swift, C. and Toor, A., Ap. J., 150, 845 (1967).Google Scholar
6 Chodil, G., Mark, H., Rodrigues, R., Seward, F. O. and Swift, C. D., Ap. J., 150, 57 (1967).Google Scholar
7 Webber, W. R., J. Geophys. Res., 67, 5091 (1962).Google Scholar
8 Galejis, J., J. Geophys. Res., 73, 339 (1968).Google Scholar
9 Winter, T. C. and Chubb, T. A., J. Geophys. Res., 72, 4405 (1967).Google Scholar
10 Chodil, G., Mark, H., Rodrigues, R. and Swift, C. D., Ap. J. Letters, 152, 1, L45 (1968).Google Scholar
11 Edwards, P. J., Nature, 217, 43 (1968).Google Scholar
12 Edwards, P. J. and Harries, J., Proc. ASA, 1, 109 (1968).Google Scholar