Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:43:35.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deuterium in the Galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

R. D. Brown
R. D. Brown*
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Monash University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There have been a number of attempts made in the last decade or two to observe deuterium in parts of the universe other than here in Earth. It is of interest merely to detect deuterium elsewhere just as it is to detect the occurrence of any nuclide. However in the case of deuterium there is a special interest because in big-bang cosmologies the great majority of deuterium in the universe is considered to have been formed in the initial fireball (Wagoner, 1973). Any observation of the present abundance of deuterium thus might give information about the very early stages of the creation of the universe. Detailed studies of nucleosynthesis during the early expansion of hot big-bang universes have however indicated a particular feature of deuterium production. (Fig. 1) The mass fraction produced X(D) is a very sensitive function of the size of the universe, as measured say by the present baryon density ϱb. Other nuclides that are mainly produced in the early expansion, such as 4He, have mass fractions less dependent on ϱb. Thus if we adopt the big-bang model for our universe we can determine ϱb from observations of X(D). Apart from any intrinsic interest in the present density of the’universe, there is considerable interest in whether the value is great enough for the present expansion to halt and go over to a collapse — or so small that the expansion of the universe will go on forever.

Type
Invited Papers
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , September 1977 , pp. 100 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, R. D., Godfrey, P. D., Storey, J. W. V., and Clark, F. O.,Nature, 262, 672 (1973).Google Scholar
Cesarsky, D. A., Moffett, A. T., and Pasachoff, J. M., Astrophys J. (Letters) 180, L1 (1973).Google Scholar
Fehsenfeld, F. C, Lindinger, W., Schmeltekopf, A. L., Albritton, D.L., and Ferguson, E. E., J. Chem. Phys., 62, 2001 (1975).Google Scholar
Fourikis, N., Takagi, K., and Saito, S. Astrophys. J. (Letters), 212, L33 (1977).Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. D., Brown, R. D., Gunn, H. I., Blackman, G. L., and Storey, J. W. V., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc, 180, 83p (1977).Google Scholar
Hollis, J. M., Snyder, L. E., Lovas, F. J., and Buhl, D., Astrophys. J. (Letters), 209, L83 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasachoff, J. M., and Cesarsky, D. A., Astrophys. J., 193, 65 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzias, A. A., Wannier, P. G., Wilson, R. W., and Linke, R. A., Astrophys. J. 211, 108 (1977).Google Scholar
Reeves, H., Amer. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 12, 437 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, J. B., and York, D. G., Astrophys. J. (Letters), 186, L95 (1973).Google Scholar
Solomon, P. M., and Woolf, N. J., Astrophys. J. (Letters), 180, L89 (1973).Google Scholar
Watson, W. D., Astrophys. J. (Letters), 181, L129 (1973).Google Scholar
Wagoner, R. V., Astrophys. J., 179, 343 (1973).Google Scholar
Weinreb, S., Nature, 195, 367 (1962).Google Scholar
Wilson, R. W., Penzias, A. A., Jefferts, K. B., and Solomon, D. M.,Astrophys. J. (Letters), 179, L107 (1973).Google Scholar
York, D. G. and Rogerson, J. B. Astrophys. J., 203, 378 (1976).Google Scholar