Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:11:11.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Energy Cosmic-Ray Muons from a Weak Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

J. A. Campbell
J. A. Campbell*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, Flinders University, S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A recent measurement of muon flux at energies greater than 1012 eV provides evidence for muon production by a process other than pion decay in cosmic-ray showers. Near this characteristic energy, the existing theory of weak interactions requires modification if it is not to violate a limitation (2) imposed by unitarity, which represents the conservation of probability. This work is an examination of modifications that are needed if the framework (4) of the theory is to be retained.

Type
Contributions
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 1968 , pp. 153 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bergeron, H. E., Keuffel, J. W., Larson, M. O., Martin, E. R. and Mason, G. W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 19, 1487 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 , E.g., Frazer, W. R., Elementary Particles, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1966, 139.Google Scholar
3 Panofsky, W. K. H., rapporteur’s paper, Heidelberg International Conference on Elementary Particles, 1967.Google Scholar
4 CERN Heavy Liquid Bubble Chamber Group, Proc. of the Internat. Conf. on Weak Interactions, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-7130, 257. Argonne, Illinois 1965.Google Scholar
5 Wataghin, V., Il Nuovo Cimento, 54A, 805 (1968).Google Scholar
6 Linsley, J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 146 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Linsley, J. and Scarsi, L., Phys. Rev. Lett., 9, 123 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Efimov, G. V., Commun. Math. Phys., 7, 138 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Cabibbo, N., Kokkedee, J., Horwitz, L. and Ne’eman, Y., Il Nuovo Cimento 45A, 275 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Andrews, D., Evans, A. C., Reid, R. J. O., Tennent, R. M., Watson, A. A. and Wilson, J. G., Nature, 219, 343 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar