Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:40:15.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A distinction between the initiation and the continuation of response preparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

AARON B. ILAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA
JEFF MILLER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Previous findings suggest that motoric response preparation cannot be initiated in parallel with memory scanning. In the present study, response preparation was initiated with the aid of a precue to examine whether such preparation can be maintained or continued while memory scanning is active. In Experiment 1, each trial began with a colored square indicating which hand might be needed to respond. A probe letter's memory set membership determined whether the primed response should be made or withheld. Lateralized readiness potentials were initiated by the square precue and continued to increase after letter presentation, suggesting that once response preparation had been initiated it was continued in parallel with memory scanning. Experiment 2 suggested that the difficulty of the concurrent memory search had little effect on the continuation of response preparation. The results support the view that motoric response preparation consists of at least two qualitatively distinct phases—initiation and continuation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)