Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T03:22:39.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic self-assessment by P.Q.R.S.T.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

David J. Mulhall
David J. Mulhall*
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Psychiatry, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr D. J. Mulhall, Academic Department of Psychiatry, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London W1P 8AA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This paper presents a Personal Questionnaire which is sufficiently simple for use in most clinical settings. Following a brief description of Personal Questionnaires, their origin and background are discussed and some subsequent developments delineated. The method involves the use of a general set of adjectives which can be used to qualify the symptoms experienced by any given patient. Successive measurements of the symptoms can be made so that changes in their subjective intensity can be monitored. The internal consistency of ratings of each symptom on each occasion is used as a measure of reliability. As with all previous Personal Questionnaires the symptoms which are measured are unique to the individual, but unlike other methods the format of this Questionnaire is predetermined, which ensures its simplicity and ease of use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , February 1977 , pp. 591 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cronbach, L. J. (1950). Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement 10, 3–31.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. & Glesser, G. C. (1957). Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ingham, J. G. (1965). A method for observing symptoms and attitudes. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, F. M. & Le Gassicke, J. (1965). A single-patient, self-controlled and self-recorded trial of Wy 3498. British Journal of Psychiatry 3, 149–154.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological Review 63, 81–97.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. P. N. (1966). On a certain type of partial higher-ordered metric scaling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 19, 77–86.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. P. N. (1967). Analysis and design of certain scaling experiments. Nature 215, 897–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J. P. N. (1970 a). A new type of personal questionnaire technique. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 9, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J. P. N. (1970 b). A further type of personal questionnaire technique. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 9, 338–346.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. P. N. (in press). Generalised personal questionnaire techniques. In Intrapersonal Space (ed. Slater, P.). Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. B. (1961). A method of measuring psychological changes specific to the individual psychiatric patient. British Journal of Medical Psychology 34, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In Handbook of Experimental Psychology (ed. Stevens, S. S.), pp. 1–49. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar