Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria: age and sex moderation of criterion functioning

  • S. H. Aggen (a1), M. C. Neale (a1) (a2), E. Røysamb (a3) (a4), T. Reichborn-Kjennerud (a3) (a5) (a6) and K. S. Kendler (a1) (a2)...

Abstract

Background

Despite its importance as a paradigmatic personality disorder, little is known about the measurement invariance of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder (BPD) criteria; that is, whether the criteria assess the disorder equivalently across different groups.

Method

BPD criteria were evaluated at interview in 2794 young adult Norwegian twins. Analyses, based on item-response modeling, were conducted to test for differential age and sex moderation of the individual BPD criteria characteristics given factor-level covariate effects.

Results

Confirmatory factor analytic results supported a unidimensional structure for the nine BPD criteria. Compared to males, females had a higher BPD factor mean, larger factor variance and there was a significant age by sex interaction on the factor mean. Strong differential sex and age by sex interaction effects were found for the ‘impulsivity’ criterion factor loading and threshold. Impulsivity related to the BPD factor poorly in young females but improved significantly in older females. Males reported more impulsivity compared to females and this difference increased with age. The ‘affective instability’ threshold was also moderated, with males reporting less than expected.

Conclusions

The results suggest the DSM-IV BPD ‘impulsivity’ and ‘affective instability’ criteria function differentially with respect to age and sex, with impulsivity being especially problematic. If verified, these findings have important implications for the interpretation of prior research with these criteria. These non-invariant age and sex effects may be identifying criteria-level expression features relevant to BPD nosology and etiology. Criterion functioning assessed using modern psychometric methods should be considered in the development of DSM-V.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: S. H. Aggen, Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry, PO Box 980126, Richmond, VA23298-0126, USA. (Email: saggen@vcu.edu)

References

Hide All
Akaike, H (1981). Likelihood of a model and information criteria. Journal of Econometrics 16, 314.
Akaike, H (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52, 317332.
APA (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.
Balsis, S, Gleason, ME, Woods, CM, Oltmanns, TF (2007). An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups. Psychology and Aging 22, 171185.
Bentler, PM (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107, 238246.
Bentler, PM, Bonett, DG (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88, 588606.
Blais, MA, Hilsenroth, MJ, Castlebury, FD (1997). Content validity of the DSM-IV borderline and narcissistic personality disorder criteria sets. Comprehensive Psychiatry 38, 3137.
Bock, RD, Aitkin, M (1981). Marginal maximum-likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 46, 443459.
Bock, RD, Gibbons, R, Muraki, E (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement 12, 261280.
Borsboom, D (2006). When does measurement invariance matter? Medical Care 44, S176S181.
Borsboom, D, Mellenbergh, GJ, van Heerden, J (2002). Different kinds of DIF: a distinction between absolute and relative forms of measurement invariance and bias. Applied Psychological Measurement 26, 433450.
Feske, U, Kirisci, L, Tarter, RE, Pilkonis, PA (2007). An application of item response theory to the DSM-III-R criteria for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders 21, 418433.
Flanagan, EH, Blashfield, RK (2003). Gender bias in the diagnosis of personality disorders: the roles of base rates and social stereotypes. Journal of Personality Disorders 17, 431446.
Flora, DB, Curran, PJ (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods 9, 466491.
Fossati, A, Beauchaine, TP, Grazioli, F, Borroni, S, Carretta, I, De Vecchi, C, Cortinovis, F, Danelli, E, Maffei, C (2006). Confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-IV Cluster C personality disorder criteria. Journal of Personality Disorders 20, 186203.
Grilo, CM, McGlashan, TH, Morey, LC, Gunderson, JG, Skodol, AE, Shea, MT, Sanislow, CA, Zanarini, MC, Bender, D, Oldham, JM, Dyck, I, Stout, RL (2001). Internal consistency, intercriterion overlap and diagnostic efficiency of criteria sets for DSM-IV schizotypal, borderline, avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 104, 264272.
Harris, JR, Magnus, P, Tambs, K (2002). The Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel: a description of the sample and program of research. Twin Research 5, 415423.
Haslam, N (2003). Categorical versus dimensional models of mental disorder: the taxometric evidence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 37, 696704.
Holland, PW, Wainer, H (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Jane, JS, Oltmanns, TF, South, SC, Turkheimer, E (2007). Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 116, 166175.
Johansen, M, Karterud, S, Pedersen, G, Gude, T, Falkum, E (2004). An investigation of the prototype validity of the borderline DSM-IV construct. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 109, 289298.
Lindsay, KA, Sankis, LM, Widiger, TA (2000). Gender bias in self-report personality disorder inventories. Journal of Personality Disorders 14, 218232.
Masters, GN (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47, 149174.
McDonald, RP (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 34, 100117.
Meredith, W (1993). Measurement invariance, factor-analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58, 525543.
Muthen, BO, Muthen, LK (2004). Mplus User's Guide, 3rd edn. Muthen & Muthen: Los Angeles, CA.
Neale, MC, Aggen, SH, Maes, HH, Kubarych, TS, Schmitt, JE (2006). Methodological issues in the assessment of substance use phenotypes. Addictive Behaviors 31, 10101034.
Neale, MC, Boker, SM, Xie, G, Maes, HH (2004). Mx: Statistical Modeling, 6th edn. Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University: Box 980126, Richmond, VA 23298.
Paris, J (2007). The nature of borderline personality disorder: multiple dimensions, multiple symptoms, but one category. Journal of Personality Disorders 21, 457473.
Pfohl, B, Blum, N, Zimmerman, M (1995). Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV). Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa: Iowa City.
Rothschild, L, Cleland, C, Haslam, N, Zimmerman, M (2003). A taxometric study of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 112, 657666.
Sanislow, CA, Grilo, CM, McGlashan, TH (2000). Factor analysis of the DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder criteria in psychiatric inpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry 157, 16291633.
Sanislow, CA, Grilo, CM, Morey, LC, Bender, DS, Skodol, AE, Gunderson, JG, Shea, MT, Stout, RL, Zanarini, MC, McGlashan, TH (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 159, 284290.
Skodol, AE, Gunderson, JG, Pfohl, B, Widiger, TA, Livesley, WJ, Siever, LJ (2002). The borderline diagnosis I: Psychopathology comorbidity, and personality structure. Biological Psychiatry 51, 936950.
Stevenson, J, Meares, R, Comerford, A (2003). Diminished impulsivity in older patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 160, 165166.
Taylor, J, Reeves, M (2007). Structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63, 805816.
Thissen, D (1991). Multilog Users' Guide: Multiple Categorical Item Analysis and Test Scoring using Item Response Theory. Scientific Software, Inc.: Chicago, IL.
Torgersen, S, Kringlen, E, Cramer, V (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry 58, 590596.
Trull, TJ, Widiger, TA, Guthrie, P (1990). Categorical versus dimensional status of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 99, 4048.
Tucker, LR, Lewis, C (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38, 110.
Widiger, TA (1998). Invited essay: sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 12, 95118.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria: age and sex moderation of criterion functioning

  • S. H. Aggen (a1), M. C. Neale (a1) (a2), E. Røysamb (a3) (a4), T. Reichborn-Kjennerud (a3) (a5) (a6) and K. S. Kendler (a1) (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.