Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:17:36.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mental Impairment and Evaluation Treatment Service: staff attitudes and staff–client interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Linda T. Walz  and
Laura H. Goldstein
Linda T. Walz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
Laura H. Goldstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Laura H. Goldstein, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This study describes and evaluates a new short-term residential service for adults with mild learning difficulties and challenging behaviour, the Mental Impairment Evaluation and Treatment Service. The study examines staff attitudes towards management practices, towards the potential achievement of individuals with learning difficulties, the staff's perceived involvement in decision making, and also the nature of their interaction with the clients, in two different settings on the Unit. The Unit's management practices were found to be client-orientated in nature and staff were more in agreement with client-orientated than institution-orientated management practices. Staff were generally optimistic about clients' potential and felt involved in decision making. Correlations between certain staff characteristics, attitudes and interactions are discussed. The study extends the range of services that have been evaluated in this way, and provides a description of the service in its early stages, which will provide an important comparison point for it when it is more permanently established.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 1992 , pp. 503 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C. I., Gillespie, C. R. & Hall, J. N. (1989). A comparison of practices, attitudes and interactions in two established units for people with a psychiatric disability. Psychological Medicine 19, 459–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, R. (1959). Institutional Neurosis. John Wright: Bristol.Google Scholar
Conning, A. M. (1986). Staff individual differences in designing treatments for chronic psychiatric patients. M.Phil, thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1977). Better Services for the Mentally Handicapped. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1985). Government response to the second report from the Social Services Committee 1984–1985 session, Community Care, Cmnd. 9674. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Garety, P. A. & Morris, I. (1984). A new unit for long-stay psychiatric patients: organization, attitudes and quality of care. Psychological Medicine 14, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, D. M. & Hartmann, D. P. (1975). Child Behaviour Analysis and Therapy. Pergamon: New York.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of the Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Doubleday: New York.Google Scholar
King, R. D. & Raynes, N. V. (1968). An operational measure of inmate management in residential institutions. Social Science and Medicine 3, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. D., Raynes, N. V. & Tizard, J. (1971). Patterns of Residential Care: Sociological Studies in Institutions for Handicapped Children. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Mansell, J., Felce, D., Jenkins, J. & De Kock, U. (1982). Increasing staff ratios in an activity room with severely mentally handicapped people. British Journal of Mental Subnormality 28, 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moores, B. & Grant, G. W. B. (1976). Nurse expectations for accomplishment of mentally retarded patients. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 80, 644–649.Google ScholarPubMed
Moores, B. & Grant, G. W. B. (1977 a). Optimists and pessmists: attitudes of nursing staff towards the development potential of mentally handicapped patients in their charge. International Journal of Nursing Studies 14, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moores, B. & Grant, G. W. B. (1977 b). Feelings of alienation among nursing staff in hospitals for the mentally handicapped. International Journal of Nursing Studies 14, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, G. & Clare, I. C. H. (1991). MIETS (Mental Impairment Evaluation and Treatment Service): II. Assessment, treatment and outcome for service users, and service effectiveness. Mental Handicap Research, 4, 180–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G., Holland, A., Fowler, P. & Reep, J. (1991). MIETS (Mental Impairment Evaluation and Treatment Service): a service option for people with mild learning disability and challenging behaviour or psychiatric problems. I. The philosophy, the service and the service users. Mental Handicap Research 4, 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynes, N. V., Pratt, M. W. & Roses, S. (1979). Organisational Structure and the Care of the Mentally Retarded. Croom Helm: London.Google Scholar
Reid, A. H. (1989). Psychiatry and mental handicap: a historical perspective. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 33, 363–368.Google ScholarPubMed
Repp, A. C., Felce, D. & De Kock, U. (1987). Observational studies of staff working with mentally retarded persons: a review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 8, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS (1985). SAS Users Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Shepherd, G. & Richardson, A. (1979). Organization and interaction in psychiatric day centres. Psychological Medicine 9, 573–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walz, L. T. (1988). A study to evaluate attitudes and behaviour of staff at a new assessment and treatment unit for adults with mild learning disabilities and disturbed behaviour (MIETS). M.Sc. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Wolfensberger, W. (1980). The definition of normalisation: update, problems, disagreements and misunderstandings. In Normalisation, Social Integration and Community Services (ed. Flynn, R. J. and Nitsch, K. E.), ch. 4, pp. 71–115. University Park Press: Baltimore.Google Scholar
Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social role valorisation: a proposed new term for the principle of normalisation. Mental Retardation 21, 234–239.Google Scholar
Wykes, T. (1982). A hostel ward for ‘new’ long-stay patients: an evaluation study of ‘a ward in a house’. Psychological Medicine, Monograph Supplement, 2, 59–97.Google Scholar