Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:11:48.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The contribution of childbearing to the sex difference in first admission rates for affective psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Richard A. Gater*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry at the University Hospital of South Manchester and Manchester Royal Infirmary, Department of Medical Statistics, University Hospital of South Manchester
Christine Dean
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry at the University Hospital of South Manchester and Manchester Royal Infirmary, Department of Medical Statistics, University Hospital of South Manchester
Julie Morris
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry at the University Hospital of South Manchester and Manchester Royal Infirmary, Department of Medical Statistics, University Hospital of South Manchester
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr R. A. Gater, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M20 8LR.

Synopsis

This epidemiological study examines the contribution of childbearing to the sex difference in first admission rates for affective psychosis. The effects of sex, age, marital status and parity on first admission rates are examined in 114 patients admitted from a defined catchment area. The rate of first admission in females is almost twice that in males. Using logistic regression analysis one significant factor accounting for this sex difference emerges: female parity. The effect of parity is evident up to the age of 54, and it entirely accounts for the sex difference in relative risk. Non-parous females have a lower relative risk of admission than males. An apparent effect of marital status is only significant in females, and is accounted for by parity and age.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, M. (1979). A simultaneous test procedure for contingency table models. Applied Statistics 28, 233242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. J. & Nelder, J. A. (1978). The GLIM system, Release 3. Numerical Algorithms Group: Oxford.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. H. & Weissman, M. M. (1981) Epidemiology of affective disorders: a reexamination and future directions. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 10391045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. (1982). Estimating fertility from household composition data in the census: the ‘own-child’ approach. Population Trends 29, 1519.Google Scholar
Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1978). Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women. Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1984). Inpatient Statistics from the Mental Health Enquiry for England. Statistical and Research Report Series, no. 27. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
Eagles, J. M. & Whalley, L. J. (1985). Ageing and affective disorder: the age at first admission of affective disorders in Scotland, 1969–1978. British Journal of Psychiatry 147, 180187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everitt, B. S. (1977). The Analysis of Contingency Tables. Chapman and Hall: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gater, R A. (1987). The contribution of childbearing and its sequelae to the sex difference in first admission rates for affective psychosis. M.Sc thesis: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Grad de Alarcon, J., Sainsbury, P. & Costain, W. R. (1975). Incidence of referred mental illness in Chichester and Salisbury. Psychological Medicine 5, 3254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R. & Clare, A. W. (1985). Women and mental illness. British Medical Journal 291, 15211522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendell, R. E., Chalmers, J. C. & Platz, C. (1987). Epidemiology of puerperal psychoses. British Journal of Psychiatry 150, 662673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ødegård, O. (1953). New data on marriage and mental disease, the incidence of psychoses in the widowed and divorced. Journal of Mental Science 99, 778785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, A. M., Barry, D. J. & Babigaian, H. M. (1972). Epidemiological considerations of psychotic depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 27, 193197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, N. C. (1974). The relationship between marital status and the risk of psychiatric referral. British Journal of Psychiatry 124, 191202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, C. (1968). The Epidemiology of Depression. John Hopkins Press: Baltimore.Google ScholarPubMed
Spicer, C C., Hare, E. H. & Slater, E. (1973). Neurotic and psychotic forms of depressive illness: evidence from age-incidence in a national sample. British Journal of Psychiatry 123, 535541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria. Rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry 35, 773782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M. M. & Klerman, G. L. (1977). Sex differences and the epidemiology of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 34, 98111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M. M. & Klerman, G. L. (1985). Gender and depression. Trends in Neurosciences 8, 416420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1967). Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death, 8th revision. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1977). Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death, 9th revision. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar