Skip to main content Accessibility help

Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: a help as well as a hindrance?

  • M. VYTHILINGAM (a1), K. S. BLAIR (a1), D. McCAFFREY (a1), M. SCARAMOZZA (a1), M. JONES (a1), M. NAKIC (a1), K. MONDILLO (a1), K. HADD (a1), O. BONNE (a2), D. G. V. MITCHELL (a3), D. S. PINE (a1), D. S. CHARNEY (a4) and R. J. R. BLAIR (a1)...



From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in ‘top-down’ regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD.


Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance.


Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT.


These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.


Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Dr James Blair, Mood and Anxiety Program, National Institute of Mental Health, 15K North Drive, MSC 2670, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. (Email:


Hide All
Armony, J. L., Corbo, V., Clement, M. H. & Brunet, A. (2005). Amygdala response in patients with acute PTSD to masked and unmasked emotional facial expressions. American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 19611963.
Atkinson, R. C. & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In Attention and Performance IV (ed. Kornblum, S.), pp. 583612. Academic Press: New York.
Balota, D. A. & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 340357.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and non-anxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin 133, 124.
Binder, J. R., McKiernan, K. A., Parsons, M. E., Westbury, C. F., Possing, E. T., Kaufman, J. N. & Buchanan, L. (2003). Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15, 372393.
Blair, K. S., Smith, B. W., Mitchell, D. G. V., Morton, J., Vythilingam, M., Pessoa, L., Fridberg, D., Zametkin, A., Sturman, D., Nelson, E. E., Drevets, W. C., Pine, D. S., Martin, A. & Blair, R. J. R. (2007). Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion. Neuroimage 35, 430440.
Blair, R. J. R., Mitchell, D. G. V. & Blair, K. S. (2005). The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain. Blackwell: Oxford.
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S. & Keane, T. M. (1995). The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. Journal of Trauma and Stress 8, 7590.
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Kiaumnizer, G. & Charney, D. S. (1990). A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD: the CAPS-1. The Behavior Therapist 13, 187188.
Bryant, R. A. & Harvey, A. G. (1995). Processing threatening information in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 104, 537541.
Buckley, T. C., Blanchard, E. B. & Neill, W. T. (2000). Information processing and PTSD: a review of the empirical literature. Clinical Psychology Review 20, 10411065.
Cassiday, K. L., McNally, R. & Zeitlin, S. (1992). Cognitive processing of trauma cues in rape victims with post-traumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research 16, 283295.
Coles, M. E. & Heimberg, R. G. (2002). Memory biases in the anxiety disorders: current status. Clinical Psychology Review 22, 587627.
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 193222.
Dubner, A. E. & Motta, R. W. (1999). Sexually and physically abused foster care children and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67, 367373.
Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The Cognitive Perspective. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Eysenck, M. W. & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: the processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion 6, 409434.
First, M., Spitzer, R., Gibbon, M. & Williams, J. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.
Foa, E. B., Feske, U., Murdock, T. B., Kozak, M. J. & McCarthy, P. R. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 100, 156162.
Freeman, J. B. & Beck, J. G. (2000). Cognitive interference for trauma cues in sexually abused adolescent girls with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 29, 245256.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 256281.
Graves, R., Landis, T. & Goodglass, H. (1981). Laterality and sex differences for visual recognition of emotional and non-emotional words. Neuropsychologia 19, 95102.
Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, C., Vo, M. L., Conrad, M. & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 28, 10221032.
Lang, P. J. & Greenwald, M. K. (1988). The International Affective Picture System Standardization Procedure and Initial Group Results for Affective Judgements. Technical reports 1A and 1B. Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida: Gainesville.
Lorenz, A. R. & Newman, J. P. (2002). Deficient response modulation and emotion processing in low-anxious Caucasian psychopathic offenders: results from a lexical decision task. Emotion 2, 91104.
Martin, M., Williams, R. M. & Clark, D. M. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information? Behavioral Research and Therapy 29, 147160.
McNally, R. J. (2006). Cognitive abnormalities in post-traumatic stress disorder. Trends in Cognitive Science 10, 271277.
McNally, R. J., Kaspi, S. P., Riemann, B. C. & Zeitlin, S. B. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 99, 398402.
Mitchell, D. G., Richell, R. A., Leonard, A. & Blair, R. J. (2006). Emotion at the expense of cognition: psychopathic individuals outperform controls on an operant response task. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115, 559566.
Morton, J. (1968). A retest of the response-bias explanation of the word frequency effect. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 21, 2122.
Nakic, M., Smith, B. W., Busis, S., Vythilingam, M. & Blair, R. J. (2006). The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: the role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex. Neuroimage 31, 17521761.
Pansky, A. & Algom, D. (2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28, 259274.
Paunovic, N., Lundh, L.-G. & Ost, L.-G. (2002). Attentional and memory bias for emotional information in crime victims with acute posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Anxiety Disorders 16, 675692.
Pessoa, L. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli. Progress in Brain Research 144, 171182.
Plaut, D. C. & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review 107, 786823.
Rauch, S. L., Shin, L. M. & Wright, C. I. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of amygdala function in anxiety disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 985, 389410.
Rauch, S. L., Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Macklin, M. L., Lasko, N. B., Orr, S. P. & Pitman, R. K. (2000). Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional MRI study. Biological Psychiatry 47, 769776.
Rush, A. J., Giles, D. E., Schlesser, M. A., Fulton, C. L., Weissenburger, J. & Burns, C. (1986). The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): preliminary findings. Psychiatry research 18, 6587.
Shear, M. K., Vander Bilt, J., Rucci, P., Endicott, J., Lydiard, B., Otto, N. W., Pollack, M. H., Chandler, L., Williams, J., Ali, A. & Frank, D. M. (2001). Reliability and validity of a Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A). Depression and Anxiety 13, 166178.
Strauss, E. (1983). Perception of emotional words. Neuropsychologia 21, 99103.
Toglia, M. P. & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of Semantic Word Norms. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Duhoux, S., Dolan, R. J. & Driver, J. (2005). Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and ‘implicit’ visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 12451260.
Williams, J. M., Mathews, A. & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin 120, 324.
Williamson, S., Harpur, T. J. & Hare, R. D. (1991). Abnormal processing of affective words by psychopaths. Psychophysiology 28, 260273.

Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: a help as well as a hindrance?

  • M. VYTHILINGAM (a1), K. S. BLAIR (a1), D. McCAFFREY (a1), M. SCARAMOZZA (a1), M. JONES (a1), M. NAKIC (a1), K. MONDILLO (a1), K. HADD (a1), O. BONNE (a2), D. G. V. MITCHELL (a3), D. S. PINE (a1), D. S. CHARNEY (a4) and R. J. R. BLAIR (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed