Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:28:06.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Limitations of Physics as a Chemical Reducing Agent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Paul A. Bogaard
Paul A. Bogaard*
Affiliation:
Mount Allison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theories of chemistry have come to depend inescapably upon the framework provided by atomic physics. This is a dependency which is anchored upon the ability within quantum theory — in particular since the wave mechanics of Schrödinger — to account for chemical bonding by the pairing of electrons, the stability of their resulting structures, and thereby to provide a basis from which to deal with chemical behavior generally. The optimism generated fifty years ago by the initial attempts to apply this framework1 has bolstered the supposition, within the sciences, that chemistry is exclusively an experimental science, it has no theory except what it borrows from atomic physics. It seems to have established, within philosophy, so secure an example of intertheoretic reduction that however often we hear it cited, it remains a case rarely, if ever, examined.

Type
Part IX. Reduction
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 344 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Cotton, F.A. and Wilkenson, G. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1972.Google Scholar
[2] Coulson, C.A. “Recent Developments in Valence Theory.” Pure and Applied Chemistry 24(1970): 257–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Coulson, C.A. Valence. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[4] DelRe, G. “Current Problems and Perspectives in the MO-LCAO Theory of Molecules.” Advances in Quantum Chemistry 8(1974): 95–136.Google Scholar
[5] Dirac, P. “Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems.” Proceedings of the Royal Society. A 123(1929): 714–733.Google Scholar
[6] Lennard-Jones, Sir John. “New Ideas in Chemistry.” Scientific Monthly 80(1955): 175–184.Google Scholar
[7] Nagel, E. “Issues in the Logic of Reductive Explanations.” In Mind, Science, and History. Edited by Keifer, H.E. and Munitz, M.K. Albany: SUNY Press, 1970. Pages 117–137.Google Scholar
[8] Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Bruce and World, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
[10] Platt, J.R. “The Chemical Bond and the Distribution of Electrons in Molecules.”Google Scholar
[11] Platt, J.R. “Properties of Large Molecules That go Beyond the Properties of Their Chemical Sub-Groups.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 1(1961): 342–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[12] Price, W.C., Chissick, S.S., and Ravensdale, T. (eds.). Wave Mechanics: The First Fifty Years. London: Butterworth, 1973.Google Scholar