Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:36:11.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is The Visual System As Smart As It Looks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Patricia Smith Churchland*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N.J. and University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba

Extract

Here is one way to portray the history of research on the visual system. It consists of a rivalry between those who discern the benchmarks of intelligence in visual perception, and those who seek to show how the appearance of intelligence can be stripped away to reveal the reality of essential stupidity. In the main the rivalry has been exciting and productive, as the two egg each other on to ever more extreme exertions; that is to exhibit demonstrations of ever more cunning ways in which stupid elements can be wired and assembled to yield smart looking results, and by reply, to exhibit demonstrations of ever more subtle and striking performances of the visual system which betoken intelligence and defy reduction by existing reductive hypotheses. The demonstrations of intelligence have typically come from behavioral experiments concerning, for example, illusory contours, and constancy in such things as size.perception and orientation perception.

Type
Part XI. Inference in Perception
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I gratefully acknowledge support for this research by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, grant no. 410-81-0182.

References

Cornsweet, T.N. (1970). Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Richard. (1970). The Intelligent Eye. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Marr, David. (1976). “Early Processing of Visual Information.” Philosophical Transactions of the Roval Society of London 275: 483-519.Google Scholar
Marr, David and Poggio, T. (1976). “Cooperative Computation of Stereo Disparity.” Science 194; 283-287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, David (1979). “Representing and Computing Visual Information.” In Artificial Intelligence: An MIT Perspective. Volume 1. Edited by Winston, P.H. and Brown, R.H.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Pages 15-80.Google Scholar
Marr, David and Poggio, T. (1979). “A Computational Theory of Human Stereo Vision.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 204: 301-328.Google Scholar
Marr, David and Hildreth, E. (1980). “Theory of Edge Detection.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 207: 187-217.Google Scholar
Marr, David (1982). Vision. San Francisco: H.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Ratliff, F. and Hartline, H.K. (1959). “The Response of Limulus Optic Nerve Fibres to Patterns of Illumination on the Receptor Mosaic.” Journal of General Physiology 42: 1211-1255.Google Scholar
Rock, Irvin. (1975). An Introduction to Perception. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Rock, Irvin. (1977). “In Defense of Unconscious Inference.” In Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception. Edited by William Epstein. New York: Wiley. Pages 321-373.Google Scholar
Rock, Irvin and Anson, Richard. (1979). “Illusory Contours as the Solution to a Problem.” Perception 8: 665-681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubens, Alan B. (1979). “Agnosia.” In Clinical Neuropsychology. Edited by Heilman, Kenneth M. and Valenstein, Edward. New York: Oxford University Press. Pages 233-267.Google Scholar
Ullman, Shimon. (1976). “Filling-in the Gaps: The Shape of Subjective Contours and a Model for Their Generation.” Biological Cybernetics 25: 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Shimon. (1979). The Interpretation of Visual Motion. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar