Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:16:42.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Galileo and the Philosophy of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Maurice A. Finocchiaro
Maurice A. Finocchiaro*
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Galileo occupies a unique position in the philosophy of science. He has a significant place both in the history of the philosophy of science and in the history of science, that is, both in the theory of scientific practice and in the practice of which philosophy of science is the theory. Moreover, virtually every philosopher of science has felt or feels the need to come to grips with Galileo, in the sense that he either derives his theories from his analysis of Galileo, or he tests the theories he has otherwise formulated by applying them to the case of Galileo. Finally, it has turned out to be possible for philosophers of science of almost any persuasion to use Galileo for their purposes, in the sense of finding evidence from Galileo to support their theories. It is this last fact to which I wish to call attention.

Type
Part IV. History and Philosophy of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1976 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1976 , 1976 , pp. 130 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clavelin, M. The Natural Philosophy of Galileo. Translated by Pomerans, A.J.. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Drake, S. “Galileo's Experimental Confirmation of Horizontal Inertia: Unpublished Manuscripts.” Isis 64(1973): 291-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P.K. “Machamer on Galileo.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 5(1975): 297-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finocchiaro, M.A. “Galileo as a Logician.” Physis 16(1974): 129-148.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M.A. “Philosophizing About Galileo.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26(1975): 255-264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, G. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Translated by Drake, S.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1953 and 1967.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. Opere, vol. vii. Edited by Favaro, A.. Florence: Barbera, 1890-1909 and later editions.Google Scholar
MacLachlan, J. “The Test of an ‘Imaginary’ Experiment of Galileo's.” Isis 64(1973): 374-379.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M.S. “Galileo's Thought.” Science 187(1975): 944-945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C.B. Review of Shapere's Galileo. Renaissance Quarterly 28(1975): 362-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settle, T.B. “An Experiment in the History of Science.” Science 133(1961): 19-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. Galileo: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Shea, W. Galileo's Intellectual Revolution. New York: Science History Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Stein, H. “Maurice Clavelin on Galileo's Natural Philosophy.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25(1974): 375-397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W.A. “Galileo and Aquinas: Demonstration Ex Suppositione and the Methodology of the Two New Sciences.” Paper presented at the 1974 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W.A. “Galileo and the Doctores Parisienses: Nominalism and the Rise, of Modern Science.” Paper presented at the 1975 New York meeting of the Society for the Study of the History of Philosophy.Google Scholar